Funny, 8 out of 10 we agreed on, albeit on a few, for different reasons.
On our differences:
RE Schmeling: I must concede that The Second World War was kinda important, LOL, so certainly those fights changed the world by creating, challenging, and destroying 'held beliefs,' important held beliefs. But I think WWII was gonna happen anyway, even if the fights didn't occur.
Of course I am not sure what you OP criteria originally was, you only stated that it was 'similar' -- anyway, I don't see Max as a (fight game) game changer.
RE Burns: Interesting point and it has clout. Burns no doubt gets big points for taking the 'mixed match' despite a intensely racial world, and it should have been a game changer, but I feel Jack Johnson blew the opportunity (I argue this in a post above) and sent the game, in regards to Black fighters, tumbling backwards. Johnson's championship, when it was done, looked to be only an anomaly; it looked like the white supremacists had won; Burns' sacrifice was for naught and the entire issue still had to be confronted!
On our differences:
RE Schmeling: I must concede that The Second World War was kinda important, LOL, so certainly those fights changed the world by creating, challenging, and destroying 'held beliefs,' important held beliefs. But I think WWII was gonna happen anyway, even if the fights didn't occur.
Of course I am not sure what you OP criteria originally was, you only stated that it was 'similar' -- anyway, I don't see Max as a (fight game) game changer.
RE Burns: Interesting point and it has clout. Burns no doubt gets big points for taking the 'mixed match' despite a intensely racial world, and it should have been a game changer, but I feel Jack Johnson blew the opportunity (I argue this in a post above) and sent the game, in regards to Black fighters, tumbling backwards. Johnson's championship, when it was done, looked to be only an anomaly; it looked like the white supremacists had won; Burns' sacrifice was for naught and the entire issue still had to be confronted!
Comment