How would Foreman fair vs Bowe and Lennox

[QueensburyRules]

not to mention Bowe knew Holyfield personally and quite well, they probably sparred together. This would have helped him a lot under the lights. We don’t know how he does if hes facing down another great that doesn’t like him.

But by out rank do you mean resume? Because head to head I couldnt put joshua, klitschko (wlad), fury and most of all Wilder ahead of him. Those guys are all packing glass and have never faced someone of bowes calibre.

Foreman is of a different class though. On their best nights Foreman obliterates them all

- - Head to head wagers like that in Valhalla gonna git U kicked out son.

Big Dummy and his Scummy Mgr Rock Newman would duck all them fighters who would not only easily outbox Big Dummy, but deep six him in Siberia...yer welcome...

[The Old LefHook]

Foreman at his not-best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGukyccqoWk

[QueensburyRules]

Foreman at his not-best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGukyccqoWk

- - Made Ali duck their rematch on video as well as keeping Ali in the bleachers where Ali belonged by then being restrained by DKing..

[tokon]

" . . facts not thoughts . . ."

These fights with foreman never happened so these are not facts, they're just your thoughts on what might have happened. Give yourself a shake but thanks for the discussion. Over and out

[mrbig1]

I read some say Ali was overrated. I'm glad I'm high.

[StarshipTrooper]

" . . facts not thoughts . . ."

These fights with foreman never happened so these are not facts, they're just your thoughts on what might have happened. Give yourself a shake but thanks for the discussion. Over and out

Then why are you here? Boxing history obviously isn't for you. You can slither back under the rock that covers the cesspool known as NSB from which you came..... Girl Bye.gif

[tokon]

Then why are you here? Boxing history obviously isn't for you. You can slither back under the rock that covers the cesspool known as NSB from which you came..... Girl Bye.gif

There's no problem.exchanging or discussing our thoughts but let's not say they're "facts". And thanks for your own, as usual, insightful thoughts too hahahaha

[Willie Pep 229]

History is the study of what happened - the Fantasy Fights forum is for those who wish to discuss what hey think would have happened.

Discussing who you think would have beaten whom is not history it's fantasy.

IMO Tokon is correct, you don't base an ATG argument on what you think the guy could have done, you base your argument on what he did.

This one poster who keeps insisting that what he sees on film somehow denotes a 'fact' - is the guy who should relocate.

[StarshipTrooper]

History is the study of what happened - the Fantasy Fights forum is for those who wish to discuss what hey think would have happened.

Discussing who you think would have beaten whom is not history it's fantasy.

IMO Tokon is correct, you don't base an ATG argument on what you think the guy could have done, you base your argument on what he did.

This one poster who keeps insisting that what he sees on film somehow denotes a 'fact' - is the guy who should relocate.

Speculative matchups have always been a part of the History Section for as long as I remember, all the way back to 2007. I see no need to change the forum culture to suit a handful of jackazzes.

[StarshipTrooper]

There's no problem.exchanging or discussing our thoughts but let's not say they're "facts". And thanks for your own, as usual, insightful thoughts too hahahaha

When I want your opinion I'll provide you with one. Until then, know your ******** role ,,!,,