Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greater Fighter Lomachenko or Robinson

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by BattlingNelson View Post
    Fwiw I’m slightly impotent
    THat would explain the choice of Battling Nelson for a handle, no doubt.

    In your opinion who would he have run away from faster, Robinson or Lomachenko? Does he do as great a job dodging them as he did McFarland?

    Comment


    • #52
      Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
      THat would explain the choice of Battling Nelson for a handle, no doubt.

      In your opinion who would he have run away from faster, Robinson or Lomachenko? Does he do as great a job dodging them as he did McFarland?
      Tell us who Lomachenko's best win is.


      He better not be undersized, Mr. SRR is a weight bully

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by travestyny View Post
        Tell us who Lomachenko's best win is.


        He better not be undersized, Mr. SRR is a weight bully
        Do you really just sit at your computer awaiting my arrival?

        My post was no sooner uploaded than you posted your own reply.

        That's a little weird. But hey, you're really fookin weird. Soo yeah, makes sense.

        I've heard of the Creepy Uncle, but until I met you, I had no idea that the Creepy Auntie was a thing, too.

        Rigo is the best opponent Loma face on paper, Campbell is the best out-right. But I'd say Linares and Pedrozo were just as strong a test as either. The former for his punch, and that being Loma's first fight at 135; the latter for proving a stylistic foil and Loma's most resilient foe.

        In any of those 4 fights you'll find more skill and composure from Lomachenko than you will from Ray's entire catalogue.

        Not to mention he's fighting men bigger than himself. That's extraordinarily remarkable considering we haven't seen a natural Featherweight successfully campaign at Lightweight since Tony Canzoneri. Whereas most of the great Welterweights went on to be better Middleweights, or at least had comparable success there.

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
          Do you really just sit at your computer awaiting my arrival?

          My post was no sooner uploaded than you posted your own reply.

          That's a little weird. But hey, you're really fookin weird. Soo yeah, makes sense.

          I've heard of the Creepy Uncle, but until I met you, I had no idea that the Creepy Auntie was a thing, too.

          Rigo is the best opponent Loma face on paper, Campbell is the best out-right. But I'd say Linares and Pedrozo were just as strong a test as either. The former for his punch, and that being Loma's first fight at 135; the latter for proving a stylistic foil and Loma's most resilient foe.

          In any of those 4 fights you'll find more skill and composure from Lomachenko than you will from Ray's entire catalogue.

          Not to mention he's fighting men bigger than himself. That's extraordinarily remarkable considering we haven't seen a natural Featherweight successfully campaign at Lightweight since Tony Canzoneri. Whereas most of the great Welterweights went on to be better Middleweights, or at least had comparable success there.

          LMAOOOO. Ohhhh, Rigondeaux, huh? Going with an undersized 37 year old, huh?

          Now, do tell me, will Rigondeax be ranked higher than Henry Armstrong????? What do ya think?

          And which do you expect to make it to the hall of fame, do tell?

          Do you expect any one of them to be ranked higher than Jake LaMotta? Let me know, dumbo

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
            Yeah, I am the idiot.

            Here I am the only one providing evidence to support my case and the dude who devoted his entire profile to William Hung on Roids is telling me that I am the one who belongs in the Hall of Shame.
            There you go again. Not making any sense. As usual. And who is William Hung?? I told you i dont follow those gay p()rn stars like you do. I wouldn't know who he is. Sorry...

            So back to you evidence that supports your case? I sure didn't see how you had any evidence what so ever. It seemed a bit delusional. Then i had to noticed...YOU are the only one to think this. You may need to create some alts and act like you have friends that are just as far out in left field as you are and pretend they agree with you.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by travestyny View Post
              LMAOOOO. Ohhhh, Rigondeaux, huh? Going with an undersized 37 year old, huh?

              Now, do tell me, will Rigondeax be ranked higher than Henry Armstrong????? What do ya think?

              And which do you expect to make it to the hall of fame, do tell?

              Do you expect any one of them to be ranked higher than Jake LaMotta? Let me know, dumbo
              Man, do yourself a favor and put idiots like this on ignore already.

              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by Anthony342 View Post
                Man, do yourself a favor and put idiots like this on ignore already.
                My bad. I will apologize for cluttering the board responding to this idiot.


                I'll leave it be. I apologize to you and the rest of the history section for engaging this idiot.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                  My bad. I will apologize for cluttering the board responding to this idiot.


                  I'll leave it be. I apologize to you and the rest of the history section for engaging this idiot.
                  Dude, no need to apologize. I love it when idiots get owned and proven wrong. I'm just trying to help because this can be bad for your mental health in the long run.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                    My bad. I will apologize for cluttering the board responding to this idiot.


                    I'll leave it be. I apologize to you and the rest of the history section for engaging this idiot.
                    I also wish I was as good at researching this stuff as you are.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by travestyny View Post
                      My bad. I will apologize for cluttering the board responding to this idiot.


                      I'll leave it be. I apologize to you and the rest of the history section for engaging this idiot.
                      *** this chump. Hes racist troll. And hes gay. Plus an idiot. He has a lot going for him. And in him also it appears.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP