Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pernell Whitaker, best in the past 30 years?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by QueensburyRules View Post
    - -Manny the Filipino "Dwarf gonna serve me sushi," TUEs words, has the most PPVs and nobody even close.

    TUE needed A 23 yr old Canelo, a Manny needing shoulder surgery, and McG making to make his fake record that most agree stinks like his fans do.
    lmao your deluded casual

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
      Do you not know grammar or punctuation? That would also explain your inability to comprehend simple sentences.

      Mayweather is 5'8", 72" reach. Whitaker was 5'6", 69" reach. Whitaker never cut the extra weight, which Floyd did. Floyd was much more conscious of adding divisional belts, while Whitaker won two of the original 8.

      Robinson weighed in comfortably as a Middleweight before he even won the Ww crown. What's so hard about that to digest. Just watch the footage, he's bigger than almost everyone he ever shares the ring with.
      But where that magical finishing ability go when he fought Maxim?

      Greb fought a particular style to exploit a particular advantage - in no way was that to sit-down on his punches and slog it out with much bigger men. It's well documented that he fought regularly and usually spotted his opponents a great deal of size. This is not news. Ignorance is not a defense.

      I'll take Gibbons, Loughran, Tunney, Smith, Brennan, Walker, over the likes of Bobo Olson and Rocky Graziano any day.
      You are a dumbazz!! You cant just look at a guy and tell how big he is their is things called bone density. You clamed Greb could fight at 147 lmao he never weighed less then 158 I bet. SRR never fought comfortably at middle before winning 147 title you dumbsh it he only weighed 153-4 WHEN HE WAS AT MIDDLE!!!! You keep changing your dumb comments and you still cant get it right. BTW May also won titles at 2 of the 8 smdh. Don't bother responding your whole posts are wrong and I don't have enough time to keep correcting you. Go do some research your making a fool out of yourself.

      Comment


      • #73
        naw, we can't just over ranking boxers because they died

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by john l View Post
          lmao your deluded casual
          - -That would make you a denuded casualty.

          Thanks for the honest update.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by john l View Post
            You are a dumbazz!! You cant just look at a guy and tell how big he is their is things called bone density. You clamed Greb could fight at 147 lmao he never weighed less then 158 I bet. SRR never fought comfortably at middle before winning 147 title you dumbsh it he only weighed 153-4 WHEN HE WAS AT MIDDLE!!!! You keep changing your dumb comments and you still cant get it right. BTW May also won titles at 2 of the 8 smdh. Don't bother responding your whole posts are wrong and I don't have enough time to keep correcting you. Go do some research your making a fool out of yourself.
            You're a walking advertisement for Planned Parenthood.

            Ask your nurse to loosen upyour helmet. You're having a harder time than usual to think straight.


            Obviously, your not an athlete, and have never competed in combat sports of any sort. Your litany of braindead comments expose that. But to clue you in, anyone who is still making 160 comfortably at 32 years old, could be brought down to 147 pounds. Maybe towards the end of his career, that wasn;t a reality. But Greb was a natural Middleweight through out his 20's. Making 147 wouldn't be a problem, as long as he had proper guidance.

            No coach I know would let a kid who walks around just north of 160 compete above 152 in High School - at the most, 145 would be even better. In college, I'd want the kid at 149.

            It's true, heighth and reach don't tell the full story. No way was Tommy Hearns bigger than Dwight Qawi, or Robinson bigger than MArciano, or Hopkins bigger than Tua. But it's also clear that there's a relationship between height and reach and body mass: no way Duran belonged in the ring w/ Hears, Tito w/ Hopkins, or Armstrong w/ Robinson. (It's also true that weight cutting begins to have diminishing effects, and can backfire on a fighter). Looking at Greb and Robinson, it's evident Robinson was the bigger man. It's also evident he feasted on smaller opponents, while Greb gave up considerable size.

            None of that is disputed. These are facts you can verify with your own eyes. Trying to dispute them is lunacy. You might as well and turn the tide, or force the sun not to shine. Ignorance is not a defense. ******ity is not a defense. Just because you don't get it, doesn't mean everyone else is equally ******.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by Rusty Tromboni View Post
              You're a walking advertisement for Planned Parenthood.

              Ask your nurse to loosen upyour helmet. You're having a harder time than usual to think straight.


              Obviously, your not an athlete, and have never competed in combat sports of any sort. Your litany of braindead comments expose that. But to clue you in, anyone who is still making 160 comfortably at 32 years old, could be brought down to 147 pounds. Maybe towards the end of his career, that wasn;t a reality. But Greb was a natural Middleweight through out his 20's. Making 147 wouldn't be a problem, as long as he had proper guidance.

              No coach I know would let a kid who walks around just north of 160 compete above 152 in High School - at the most, 145 would be even better. In college, I'd want the kid at 149.

              It's true, heighth and reach don't tell the full story. No way was Tommy Hearns bigger than Dwight Qawi, or Robinson bigger than MArciano, or Hopkins bigger than Tua. But it's also clear that there's a relationship between height and reach and body mass: no way Duran belonged in the ring w/ Hears, Tito w/ Hopkins, or Armstrong w/ Robinson. (It's also true that weight cutting begins to have diminishing effects, and can backfire on a fighter). Looking at Greb and Robinson, it's evident Robinson was the bigger man. It's also evident he feasted on smaller opponents, while Greb gave up considerable size.

              None of that is disputed. These are facts you can verify with your own eyes. Trying to dispute them is lunacy. You might as well and turn the tide, or force the sun not to shine. Ignorance is not a defense. ******ity is not a defense. Just because you don't get it, doesn't mean everyone else is equally ******.
              "looking at Greb and Robinson its clear Robinson is bigger" that's your quote. Now where did you see Greb fight????? These are the things your trying to prove to me, 1st Robinson picked on smaller guys his whole career. 2nd Greb was a big puncher and a natural 147pder. I will point this out to you ONE last time. 1st Robinson fought his WHOLE middleweight career at around 153-5 and started out at 135. 2nd Greb was a great fighter, but was no big puncher and was a big 160pder that NEVER weighed less then 157-8 at his lowest and most of time felt better fighting over 160 and would have to cut off a limp to make 147.Last time I will respond to your dumbazz go bug someone else.BTW where do you get that Greb(who was known to kill himself making 160) "walked around just north of 160" all you idiots do the same thing you try to squeeze in sh it that you just made up.

              Comment

              Working...
              X
              TOP