Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Pernell Whitaker, best in the past 30 years?
Collapse
-
Pea proved himself further and more convincingly than Mayweather did. He didn't wait 6, 7, 8, 9 years to fight Chavez, the way Mayweather stalled Pacquiao. Instead he fought big challenges as soon as he could. That is a HUGE difference, kiddies. Not thrilling to watch, but he is a greater fighter than Mayweather, and would give complete fits to anyone in his weight range from any period whatsoever.
Comment
-
For the hundredth time, Floyd signed for the fight when both were prime. It was Pacquiao who stalled because of stricter drug testing.
Anyway...Pernell Whitaker certainly qualifies for being the best boxer of the past 30 years.
It's between him, Roy Jones, or Floyd in my opinion.
Comment
-
Tsk! Tsk! No defenders of stallers allowed. The timeline of the rest of Lil' Floyd's record points up what an atrocious staller he really was. It wasn't just Pacman he waited on to slow down, he did it with all dangerous fighters, or avoided them altogether, by buggery. Everyone he fought that was supposed to be any good was fought on the tail end of their goodness. Very purposeful of him, but does not make him a great fighter. Beating prime greats is what does that. This is precisely why Leonard is regarded so much more highly than Lil' Floyd--he defeated a monster prime Hearns. Some other greats he got to were not quite prime, but not so with Hearns. Tommy was in his dead prime when he and Ray met. There is no such fight on MW's pathetic resume. Both Mosley and Judah were fought much later than they could and should have been.
Lil' Floyd hoodwinked a lot of halfwits. He was the black Calzaghe whose matchmaker scoured the rest homes of three continents.Last edited by The Old LefHook; 07-20-2019, 12:23 AM.
Comment
-
Who else did Floyd stall? This I have to hear.
And why is a topic about Pernell Whitaker turning into yet another Floyd Mayweather theead?
Comment
-
You can't argue that Mayweather's record compares to Whitaker's. Or that he was as good a pure-boxer.
You can argue that Mayweather had a longer career and was more proefssional. But I am not really sure what that amounts to.*
It's Whitaker's fault and no one else's that he wasn't in prime form for DLH and Trinidad, but at least he fought them. Can you imagine Floyd fighting those guys at that point in their careers!?!?!?
If Whitaker had taken the Floyd approach, he'd probably instead be fighting dudes half his size at 126, rather than entering the ring with a beast like Tito.
*Mayweather was also a more complete fighter. While we may fixate on juxtaposing Mayweather's boring defensive style w/ Pete's artistic take, once upon a time Mayweather was a Boxer-Puncher. In the same vein and Robinson and Hearns who could be really butch when bullying smaller men, but then butt-pucker against guys their own size, Mayweather at 130 pounds had the finishing ability that Pernell Whitaker and his 50 Million punches per fight could never match. But again, Mayweather wasn't fighting anyone especially impressive, and the Castillo fights showed how confident Floyd was in his offense, once faced with men his size/calibre.
So Floyd was technically a more complete fighter, but I am not sure what that matters.
Comment
-
Originally posted by john l View PostI think he beats Pac not easy but REAL clear. Have no idea who wins between Pea and May that's my dream fight as they are the two best to turn pro in last 40 years.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View PostI honestly think he beats Floyd, he is the one guy that is just as elusive as Floyd, but he was a straight up dog that would “fight” you.. plus the southpaw
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostFor the hundredth time, Floyd signed for the fight when both were prime. It was Pacquiao who stalled because of stricter drug testing.
Anyway...Pernell Whitaker certainly qualifies for being the best boxer of the past 30 years.
It's between him, Roy Jones, or Floyd in my opinion.
Comment
-
Originally posted by john l View PostOscar hates Floyd and you know it and of course at this time not too many are going to say anything negative about the GREAT Pea(and rightfully so)and Fenech never fought either and would not call him an expert on tech boxing(still great). Both COULD beat ANYONE at their best weight(30-35) in they're prime and even though im pretty good picking fights I have NO IDEA who would win.
Fenech got to know Pea well in the Olympics and was scheduled to fight him professionally but for the fight falling out for the usual reasons.
Interview was tributes to Pea. You gotta prob with that?
Comment
Comment