Is Gerald Mcclellan the best MW of teh Roy Jones Jr Era?

[billeau2]

I can get laid once in a while too, in unfavorable circumstances and metal health.

It makes them simlar, so simlar enough to make my point exactly the same, and just as valid, speed and points still matter more in the amateurs when compared to the pros. ******?

Too easy.....

"******?" yes! very ******! So please abandon at all costs. Using mom's basement and your left hand is more than merely "unfavorable." I guess pros don't have to win rounds and get points do they? Lets not even address the inanity of saying speed is more important in one form of fighting where speed is a main component... Oh the inanity of it all...Little Alex you are giving me a headache your ignorance is running rampant! like the shatstain you were, perculating, bubbling out of mom onto the curb and taking form.

You are regressing little Alex, keep it up and you will be little more than a brown puddle sans the unlucky ***** that found ya... Elroy would be proud of ya. Try to keep up little Alex... Try to keep up...

[robertzimmerman]

Gerald Mcclellan IS NOT McCullum , Mc Callum is a fighter everyone beat including James Toney and RJJ

Mike was a better fighter than Gerald.

Although he was still a great fighter when he fought Toney in the early 90's, he was faded. And he was obviously even more faded when Roy and Toney beat him at LHW. He was 40 then.

[robertzimmerman]

Its perfectly fair Roy Jones Jr said himself HE WOULD NOT EVER FIGHT HIM AT PRO EVER!!!

Thats not only a duck its a very honest and obvious duck

I'm sure Roy would have fought him after Benn if it'd been feasible.

[IronDanHamza]

Considering Toney beat both McCallum and Nunn, wouldn't you have to give him the nod?

Toney got a gift against Reggie Johnson so Johnson should be above Toney in that case.

Although Dave Tiberi beat him even easier.

[The Old LefHook]

Alex just wants to know the best middleweight. That is a reasonable question. Of course, however, it has to be 1oo% opinion. Very few ATGs at any weight meet close enough to their primes to make the ultimate evaluation. Leonard and Hearns did--Leonard was slightly better; Hoya and Trinidad did--Hoya was slightly better; Toney and Jones did--Jones was much superior. There could be a couple of more Brits in the mix. There are many places where the issue was not settled, which is too often the case with boxing since that time.

McClellan, though dangerous for anyone, had serious flaws and is, I believe, somewhat overrated, simply because he died young and was only knocked from his pedastel once and died of headbutts. There would have been others, since he had serious chinese in his armor. His advantages were constant aggression (which served as a defense) and the high ground, which he usually held and possessed the right tools and style for exploiting with his big punch. He had a mediocre inside game and no real defense other than aggression and height. I can see just about anyone mentioned knocking him off in their primes, not that they would beat him every time but they would fight on even or better terms in a series. He might have the number of some, but I believe others would find his number. I was surprised Jackson could not do it the second time around, but I guess he was the past thing and McClellan was the coming thing, the way it always goes in boxing.

[Canelo and GGG]

Gerald was one of the best,i wont say any thing knew if i say that he was a Tyson of MWS ,vicious puncher who could go only forward,it was his biggest Feat but also flew.there was many good mws,Diffrent styles in this era,like Toney hated by IronDan (but he was good,he lost to Johnson but many best boxers have loses ),you have brits,Roy jones etc,to hard to say who was the best.