Originally posted by The Old LefHook
View Post
I list the potential wildcards: Johnson being a hardworking man from the olden days is likely very strong and tough, just my person observation. No phones no media just raw humans being as tough as possible. He’s schooled in old bareknuckle tactics. They don’t look sexy because these guys didn’t grow up seeing themselves on tv in HD, they just did what worked best in real life. This could be better or worse in the sense of less distraction but potentially missing knowledge.
the cons: Mike may have fought many cans but he fought in an era with more rules and a better system to rank fighters. Johnson seemed to be fighting in an era of “I’m the sheriff in this town” type match making. Where weight and size meant little outside of who the man was. My guess is Tysons best competition was better than Johnsons best competition (Spinks, Holmes, Holyfield, Lewis)
ill further my previous points that Johnson held the baddest man on the planet title as well, so he’s a bad man, he’s not Bruce Seldon.
now that they are restoring the really old footage, its extremely interesting to watch the worlds best at the turn if the century. Very classic stances and awkward “dated” moves you don’t see anymore, and some older versions of new st****. Some fundamentals have stayed the same. But in the awkwardness of the old style is the confidence and relaxation of great champions that makes me think these fights might have been tougher than expected.
Comment