Steadfast opinions and Interests

[Zaroku]

My dad and I argue to this day about an Arguello/Sanchez matchup. My dad maintains that Arguellos power would have told the story and I say Sanchezs hand and foot speed would have lead him to a decision win. Sure would have liked to see who was right.

I have wondered the very same thing. Often!


On another topic!
I remember betting against the hawk, twice and losing money both times!
******* could have been the difference in the fight. The hawk got hit with some bombs, and didn't go to sleep! Was it the Peruvian Flake *******?? Or a great chin?

[sonnyboyx2]

What's to explain. Sanchez won a lopsided victory. The judge who turned in the card with him losing by 1 point never judged another professional fight before or after this fight. Nuff said.

Let me guess, your pea brain puts Sanchez in the same company as Hagler and Lewis.

Your not far wrong there. I don't rate Sanchez as highly as you obviously do, However he was certainly a very good fighter, as was Hagler & Lewis. But the difference between me and you is that i don't "Talk shyte" like you do. I don't have a narrow minded approach to boxing. I read how some claim Lewis to be second only to Muhammad Ali. I read how some claim Hagler to be second to or even better than Sugar Ray Robinson. Which is laughable.. You even doubted Sam Langford would Knock Out Hagler in 4rds.. Well as a ******** man, i would be very surprised if Hagler lasted 4rds. Langford would KO him very quickly. it's a complete mismatch.... But i have been reading some of your comments, which are so bazzaar and wide of the mark, only you and your daddy(who you keep referring about) could coin such foolish comments... You even put forward Tyson Fury as "FOTY 2015" ... You must make such comments for shock value or a joke...:blow:

[just the facts]

Your not far wrong there. I don't rate Sanchez as highly as you obviously do, However he was certainly a very good fighter, as was Hagler & Lewis. But the difference between me and you is that i don't "Talk shyte" like you do. I don't have a narrow minded approach to boxing. I read how some claim Lewis to be second only to Muhammad Ali. I read how some claim Hagler to be second to or even better than Sugar Ray Robinson. Which is laughable.. You even doubted Sam Langford would Knock Out Hagler in 4rds.. Well as a ******** man, i would be very surprised if Hagler lasted 4rds. Langford would KO him very quickly. it's a complete mismatch.... But i have been reading some of your comments, which are so bazzaar and wide of the mark, only you and your daddy(who you keep referring about) could coin such foolish comments... You even put forward Tyson Fury as "FOTY 2015" ... You must make such comments for shock value or a joke...:blow:

Sorry Skippy, I quit reading after you claimed you don't have a narrow mind. Almost all of your posts suggest otherwise

[billeau2]

What's to explain. Sanchez won a lopsided victory. The judge who turned in the card with him losing by 1 point never judged another professional fight before or after this fight. Nuff said.

Let me guess, your pea brain puts Sanchez in the same company as Hagler and Lewis.

oh shizzle!

[Elroy1]

You are being called on all your bs and its a lovely thing to see the heights you will go as you try to squirm out.

Yet once again, you continue to put forth these fanciful occasions where I am levelled but somehow I never actually see it happen.

Itis well known that when I am proven wrong on a subject, I am quick to concede and even offer the proper respect in return for being educated.

The reason you haven't been privy to that yet, is because you have never succeeded in bringing anything to the table that stands up to credible analysis.. It's all spin and abuse, nothing more!

If you took your head out of your ass and listened for once, you might actually learn something Bill!

[sonnyboyx2]

Sorry Skippy, I quit reading after you claimed you don't have a narrow mind. Almost all of your posts suggest otherwise

run along up the stairs, your Daddy is waiting for you boy

[billeau2]

Yet once again, you continue to put forth these fanciful occasions where I am levelled but somehow I never actually see it happen.

Itis well known that when I am proven wrong on a subject, I am quick to concede and even offer the proper respect in return for being educated.

The reason you haven't been privy to that yet, is because you have never succeeded in bringing anything to the table that stands up to credible analysis.. It's all spin and abuse, nothing more!

If you took your head out of your ass and listened for once, you might actually learn something Bill!

Stay out of history section junior, this section is for adults... I don't actually have to prove you wrng because you contradict yourself. :blow:

You don't see it happen because you are an idiot, heres a clue...just because you don't see it does not mean it didn't happen.

Credible analysis? Dude you don't even do uncredible analysis! About the best you can try to do is put words in my mouth and that failed miserably.

[billeau2]

run along up the stairs, your Daddy is waiting for you boy

Wow troll#2 very witty reparte, such originality!

[Elroy1]

Stay out of history section junior, this section is for adults... I don't actually have to prove you wrng because you contradict yourself. :blow:

Haw haw, have a listen to it!!

The realist movement is a seamless non-contradicting theory because it is basically reactionary, reactionary to PROOF. It is difficult to be proven wrong when one follows the path of truth so closely.

Yours is an elitist attitude if I have EVER heard one!

You enjoy your circle jerk mate, whenever you feel like debating boxing with the REAL experts JUNIOR.. you give old Elroy a call there huh mate

[Elroy1]

Wow troll#2 very witty reparte, such originality!

Sonny's sharp and witty reply contained more common sense and said more actual facts than a 200 word paragraph of yours ever could!

You not only mince words, you waste them!