Ali vs Wilt

[Elroy1]

This is coming from someone who calls Sugar Ray Robinson a bum?

Someone who said Earnie Shavers would have the same punching power as Chris Byrd if he fought now?

Someone who said he would be able to beat prime Jack Dempsey in a boxing match?

Sorry, when I read your posts I see a guy with clown hair, a clown nose, and clown shoes. So try to spread your propaganda somewhere else, Bozo. You have zero credibility with me.

MY Propaganda?

I'm stunned. I've got to go and lie down!

I'm here the bust myths, B.U.S.T. them, not propogate them.

I don't know if I'd be able to beat Jack Dempsey for real but he doesn't LOOK like much to me on film. I am certain there is atleast a couple good bouncers in every club in Adelaide SA that could have wasted him!

Earnie Shavers was so abysmally skilled that he could barely land on any post 1990 HW's. Combined with the actual stats of Shavers, that his KO ratio against the avergae sized opponents 1980's+ was only 50%, this places him in the effective range of Chris Byrd.

I can concede that the power of Shavers would have been more than Byrd with disragard to delivery skills, of course. But as soon as you factor those important elements in, he's busted.

Shavers was a bum-buster and cruiser cruncher mainly, with hardly any wins against any relevant and decent opponents! Basically useless Ali (for which he was robbed) and Chinny Norton.

Ray Robinson? I already clarified, Robinson to have the greatest "numerical" record and to have been great in his era. I made it very clear that he would be considered a bum only if he fought TODAY!

These are facts, they are not my opinions! They are simply where the path of truth leads for those who have the courage and the fortitude to follow it without swaying or being swayed.

[Scott9945]

single th

MY Propaganda?

I'm stunned. I've got to go and lie down!

I'm here the bust myths, B.U.S.T. them, not propogate them.

I don't know if I'd be able to beat Jack Dempsey for real but he doesn't LOOK like much to me on film. I am certain there is atleast a couple good bouncers in every club in Adelaide SA that could have wasted him!

Earnie Shavers was so abysmally skilled that he could barely land on any post 1990 HW's. Combined with the actual stats of Shavers, that his KO ratio against the avergae sized opponents 1980's+ was only 50%, this places him in the effective range of Chris Byrd.

I can concede that the power of Shavers would have been more than Byrd with disragard to delivery skills, of course. But as soon as you factor those important elements in, he's busted.

Shavers was a bum-buster and cruiser cruncher mainly, with hardly any wins against any relevant and decent opponents! Basically useless Ali (for which he was robbed) and Chinny Norton.

Ray Robinson? I already clarified, Robinson to have the greatest "numerical" record and to have been great in his era. I made it very clear that he would be considered a bum only if he fought TODAY!

These are facts, they are not my opinions! They are simply where the path of truth leads for those who have the courage and the fortitude to follow it without swaying or being swayed.

Are you mentally challenged? Every single thing you wrote is your opinion, not a fact. Stop telling that lie.

[Elroy1]

single th

Are you mentally challenged? Every single thing you wrote is your opinion, not a fact. Stop telling that lie.

No it is not an opinion when the entire theory set produced comes from first principles and rigorously evidenced postulations.

I would call that pretty much an established facts.

The religious nonsense otherwise posted by guys like yourself, I would call "nut baggery".

[Scott9945]

No it is not an opinion when the entire theory set produced comes from first principles and rigorously evidenced postulations.

I would call that pretty much an established facts.

The religious nonsense otherwise posted by guys like yourself, I would call "nut baggery".

Okay, I understand. Your mental challenge is that you're hopelessly delusional.

[Suckmedry]

Are you mentally challenged? Every single thing you wrote is your opinion, not a fact. Stop telling that lie.

HAHAHA do we really need to ask that question ?

Look at the frequency this dude posts about the same fcuking crap day in day out, rabidly arguing the same ****** points with the same inane logic. He's far from a healthy and sane individual.

[HughJass]

Yea because we all know how super strong those 60's fighters were correct? Even Fury would dominate that era,thats how weak it was.

lets see who the top guys were...

Aged Folley at 6'0 200 pounds slow footed and basic...no movement at all really.

Aged /injured and debilitated Cleveland Williams .


6'1 190 pound Karl milenburger another slow footing,slow punching,glass jaw who cut easy....


These were the top guys of alis prime........ ^^^^^



yea sure a 7'1 270 pound athletic guy doesn't fare well......

Nice comic hero avi.....How old are you? 4 lol

[Ray Corso]

As I've said for months now these kids are here for their own entertainment!
Nothing they comment on has any validity its all about getting a rise and starting to stir the pot! Why their tolerated by mods is beyond me, nothing they say belongs on a boxing forum. The Sugar Ray comments alone should get them banned for BSing!

FACT! Why should we have to babysit these b****?

Ray

[juggernaut666]

Nice comic hero avi.....How old are you? 4 lol

Im your teacher and rays schooler daily on here !

[billeau2]

No it is not an opinion when the entire theory set produced comes from first principles and rigorously evidenced postulations.

I would call that pretty much an established facts.

The religious nonsense otherwise posted by guys like yourself, I would call "nut baggery".

The reason you cannot be argued with is precisely because in addition to having an agenda that prevents any clear thoughts on issues, you steadfast refuse to understand the difference between a fact and an opinion. There is nothing wrong with an opinion...though some of the things you postulate are ridiculous...but that is not a necessary condition of an opinion...but one must know the difference between an opinion and a fact, you do not.

So you name call, clogg up the section and do the equivalent of yell so loud that after a while no one really wants to compete with your boorishness. Thats what you gain through your postings here and nothng else.

[billeau2]

HAHAHA do we really need to ask that question ?

Look at the frequency this dude posts about the same fcuking crap day in day out, rabidly arguing the same ****** points with the same inane logic. He's far from a healthy and sane individual.

Good to see you again bro!