Debatable decisions, you feel were one-sided victories

[sonnyboyx2]

Debatable decisions in history, which you feel was one-sided victories.

Holmes vs Spinks (1) ~ clear cut victory for Spinks 10-5rds
Leonard vs Hagler ~ clear cut victory for Leonard 8-4rds
Lewis vs Mercer ~ clear cut victory for Lewis 6-4rds
Fenech vs Nelson (1) ~ 6-6rds a draw
Hearns vs Leonard (2) ~ clear cut victory for Hearns 8-4rds
Whitaker vs Chavez ~ clear cut victory for Whitaker 9-3rds

others ????

[IronDanHamza]

Willie Pastrano-Harold Johnson.

One sided victory for Johnson, Pastrano got the decision.

[IronDanHamza]

Very suprised you had Lewis-Mercer a clear cut win for Lewis.

I had Mercer in that fight.

[soul_survivor]

Debatable decisions in history, which you feel was one-sided victories.

Holmes vs Spinks (1) ~ clear cut victory for Spinks 10-5rds
Leonard vs Hagler ~ clear cut victory for Leonard 8-4rds
Lewis vs Mercer ~ clear cut victory for Lewis 6-4rds
Fenech vs Nelson (1) ~ 6-6rds a draw
Hearns vs Leonard (2) ~ clear cut victory for Hearns 8-4rds
Whitaker vs Chavez ~ clear cut victory for Whitaker 9-3rds

others ????

Agreed with Leonard v Hagler, Sugar Ray made Hagler pay all night long.

But, having said that, what do you mean by debatable decisions? Decisions by the judges or what people believe to be debatable decisions in general, cos Whitaker v Chavez isn't really debatable except for 3 people sitting ringside lol

[billeau2]

Very suprised you had Lewis-Mercer a clear cut win for Lewis.

I had Mercer in that fight.

I did also...Every champ gets at least one "gift" and i think that was Lewis' "gift." It was one of those "you have to take the belt from the champ" type decisions. Its interesting what Lewis said about that fight. It reveals how he thinks about fighting. he claimed that he had not trained properly for the type of opponent Mercer was and that he had problems changing his strategy in the fight.

Lewis has a real chess player mentality! haha.

[billeau2]

Debatable decisions in history, which you feel was one-sided victories.

Holmes vs Spinks (1) ~ clear cut victory for Spinks 10-5rds
Leonard vs Hagler ~ clear cut victory for Leonard 8-4rds
Lewis vs Mercer ~ clear cut victory for Lewis 6-4rds
Fenech vs Nelson (1) ~ 6-6rds a draw
Hearns vs Leonard (2) ~ clear cut victory for Hearns 8-4rds
Whitaker vs Chavez ~ clear cut victory for Whitaker 9-3rds

others ????

First Hopkins Taylor fight. I believe he won the second but not at the margins he did the first.

[IronDanHamza]

Ali vs Doug Jones, Morales vs Espadas I, Johnson vs Froch, Johnson vs Dawson I, Campillo vs Cloud, Ottke vs Larsen, Freitas vs Casamayor, Collazo vs Hatton, Sturm vs De la Hoya, Sturm vs Griffin I, Lara vs Martirosyan, Lewis vs Holyfield I, Chagaev vs Valuev, Briggs vs Adamek I&II, Richardson vs Moon, Wilson vs Mercer ... man there was plenty.
I thought guys in bold won those fights very clearly.

Agree with most.

The only head scratcher there to me is Johnson-Froch.

I don't see how you could argue that Froch didn't win that fight.

[sonnyboyx2]

I did also...Every champ gets at least one "gift" and i think that was Lewis' "gift." It was one of those "you have to take the belt from the champ" type decisions. Its interesting what Lewis said about that fight. It reveals how he thinks about fighting. he claimed that he had not trained properly for the type of opponent Mercer was and that he had problems changing his strategy in the fight.

Lewis has a real chess player mentality! haha.

i wasn't focused
the referee counted to fast
it was a lucky punch
i never trained correctly

Lewis was full of them excuses, refusing to give credit to an opponent.

[billeau2]

i wasn't focused
the referee counted to fast
it was a lucky punch
i never trained correctly

Lewis was full of them excuses, refusing to give credit to an opponent.

We all know Lewis never did anything credible...by the serendipidy of the universe his luck knowing no bounds, he managed to always catch the right moment, fraud that he is.

Your a hypocrite. you want Lewis to give credit to an opponent but you will never give credit to lewis. Now be a good lad and tell me how "I give credit to Lewis I been following him since ____I know more about Lewis than________," yada yada rinse and repeat.

[sonnyboyx2]

We all know Lewis never did anything credible...by the serendipidy of the universe his luck knowing no bounds, he managed to always catch the right moment, fraud that he is.

Your a hypocrite. you want Lewis to give credit to an opponent but you will never give credit to lewis. Now be a good lad and tell me how "I give credit to Lewis I been following him since ____I know more about Lewis than________," yada yada rinse and repeat.

your wrong, i often give credit to Lewis. i made a post a few months back, saying IMO Lewis right-hand was one of the best in history. i have never said anything about Lewis which i don't believe to be true... ATG Top 20 Heavyweights..i rate Lewis around 13-15..anyone who rates Lewis Top 5 knows **** all about boxing.