Debatable decisions, you feel were one-sided victories

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tony Trick-Pony
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Feb 2014
    • 16950
    • 1,408
    • 3,121
    • 139,355

    #21
    The first Duran-Camacho fight. Definitely 8-4 for Duran easy. The judges just had it in for him for whatever reason.

    Comment

    • Anthony342
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 11801
      • 1,461
      • 355
      • 102,713

      #22
      I'm surprised Duran didn't say "You no macho" afterwards or "I'm more macho than you".

      Comment

      • soul_survivor
        LOL @ Ali-Holmes
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 18949
        • 623
        • 473
        • 65,236

        #23
        Originally posted by Scott9945
        I don't think Bradley deserved the win. But he did deserve a less biased call by cheerleader Lampley and the HBO crew.
        Really? In what way? He barely won more than 2 or 3 rounds. A panel of 5 judges scored it by wide margins for Pacquiao. Bradley got taken to school in that fight.

        Comment

        • ironalex
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jul 2006
          • 797
          • 25
          • 0
          • 11,336

          #24
          Originally posted by sonnyboyx2
          Debatable decisions in history, which you feel was one-sided victories.

          Holmes vs Spinks (1) ~ clear cut victory for Spinks 10-5rds
          Leonard vs Hagler ~ clear cut victory for Leonard 8-4rds
          Lewis vs Mercer ~ clear cut victory for Lewis 6-4rds
          Fenech vs Nelson (1) ~ 6-6rds a draw
          Hearns vs Leonard (2) ~ clear cut victory for Hearns 8-4rds
          Whitaker vs Chavez ~ clear cut victory for Whitaker 9-3rds

          others ????
          Very surprised you had the hagler Leonard fight not close, could have gone either way.

          I think one of the worst I have seen was robin reid vs sven ottke

          Comment

          • Joeyzagz
            Soir
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 6253
            • 569
            • 567
            • 16,120

            #25
            Originally posted by sonnyboyx2
            your wrong, i often give credit to Lewis. i made a post a few months back, saying IMO Lewis right-hand was one of the best in history. i have never said anything about Lewis which i don't believe to be true... ATG Top 20 Heavyweights..i rate Lewis around 13-15..anyone who rates Lewis Top 5 knows **** all about boxing.
            13-15?? You are full of Dog****.

            I bet you have 3-5 guys on your list who never fought a black guy.

            Another 6 who never beat anyone over 230 lbs.

            Probably 10-12 who never faced an Eastern EuropeAn who dominate the division today..

            Lennox beat everyone he ever faced. Beat the best heavyweights America, UK, and Eastern Europe had to offer. He is the Alpha and the Omega of the division. 6'5, 240+ Beast of a man and last undisputed HW champion 15 years and counting

            Comment

            • Tony Trick-Pony
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2014
              • 16950
              • 1,408
              • 3,121
              • 139,355

              #26
              Originally posted by Anthony342
              I'm surprised Duran didn't say "You no macho" afterwards or "I'm more macho than you".
              Haha. I hear you. The announcers were certain of a Duran victory and then the decision was announced...crickets. Disgraceful.

              Comment

              • Scott9945
                Gonna be more su****ious
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2007
                • 22032
                • 741
                • 1,371
                • 30,075

                #27
                Originally posted by soul_survivor
                Really? In what way? He barely won more than 2 or 3 rounds. A panel of 5 judges scored it by wide margins for Pacquiao. Bradley got taken to school in that fight.
                Lampley's blow by blow was simply inaccurate. He gave Pacquiao credit for missing and didn't acknowledge anything Bradley accomplished. That's nothing new from HBO. His call of the Margarito-Cotto fights was even more biased.

                I'm not saying that Bradley deserved that decision. He didn't. Just that the broadcasters made it sound more lopsided than it really was.

                Comment

                Working...
                TOP