Lewis vs Bowe 93 i found this article

[sonnyboyx2]

hmm

As soon as you asked who Foreman Knocked out that was better than Tyson's opponent's you minimized Foreman's victory oved Frazier. Frazier is clearly better than anybody Tyson ever knocked out. But I wouldn't put it past you to make a case for Trevor Berbick because that's how you operate.

What makes this funny is you claim Marvis Frazier was a great win. But Joe Frazier wasn't a better one?


You questioned whether Frazier in 73 and 76 was in better condition than that version of Holmes which is just ******.


All of this is in the "Tyson hits harder than Foreman and Shavers thread." But you already knew that. I don't have to show you anything. It's in there for you and everyone else to read.

By the way Sonnyboy, the only thing systematically destroyed in the forum has been you and your lame ass attempts to make up lies and use them as if they were facts.

This is what you are talking about is it

"""Are you claiming Joe Frazier (1973 & 76) was in better condition than the Larry Holmes who Mike Tyson knocked out?

Ken Norton lost every time he fought a puncher, Gerry Cooney nearly killed him in less than 60 seconds.

Holmes & Spinks both KOd by Tyson along with 7 other former champions.


Tyson Knocked Out 9 World Champions
Foreman knocked Out 6 World Champions
Shavers Knocked Out 2 World Champions

You never answered the above question i put to you
reason you never answered was "you knew i was correct" so now on a different thread you are trying to make out i have rubbished Joe Frazier. you are one very very sad old man. It is easy for all to see what your game is on this forum, You are a TROLL of the very worst kind. you are not here to talk boxing, you are trolling on a daily basis..

Let me address the above question i put to you, which you refused to address knowing what i was going to hit you back with!

You are claiming that Joe Frazier when at the tail-end of his career and over 20lbs overweight, his record was 3-4-1 with two of those losses to Foreman. Was better than Larry Holmes was when losing to Mike Tyson and who went on to compile a record afterwards of 21-3 (10 KOs) including 3 world title fights.. This is proof of your Trolling..

You have deliberately set-out to deceive, you have deliberately set-out to try to "Blacken my name" You have deliberately set-out to ridicule me and make out, i was insinuating different to what i had put into print".. You are Trolling this site and it is detrimental to the Forum and all it.s users. i have exposed you for exactly what you are. which is a TROLL... an internet TROLL who operates on this Forum along with two others.

It is time the moderators took you to task. Because it is now clear what you are up too.

[Suckmedry]

This thread has some pretty brilliant parts. Sonnyboys accusations getting more and more ludicrous

[joseph5620]

This is what you are talking about is it

"""Are you claiming Joe Frazier (1973 & 76) was in better condition than the Larry Holmes who Mike Tyson knocked out?

Ken Norton lost every time he fought a puncher, Gerry Cooney nearly killed him in less than 60 seconds.

Holmes & Spinks both KOd by Tyson along with 7 other former champions.


Tyson Knocked Out 9 World Champions
Foreman knocked Out 6 World Champions
Shavers Knocked Out 2 World Champions

You never answered the above question i put to you
reason you never answered was "you knew i was correct" so now on a different thread you are trying to make out i have rubbished Joe Frazier. you are one very very sad old man. It is easy for all to see what your game is on this forum, You are a TROLL of the very worst kind. you are not here to talk boxing, you are trolling on a daily basis..

Let me address the above question i put to you, which you refused to address knowing what i was going to hit you back with!

You are claiming that Joe Frazier when at the tail-end of his career and over 20lbs overweight, his record was 3-4-1 with two of those losses to Foreman. Was better than Larry Holmes was when losing to Mike Tyson and who went on to compile a record afterwards of 21-3 (10 KOs) including 3 world title fights.. This is proof of your Trolling..

You have deliberately set-out to deceive, you have deliberately set-out to try to "Blacken my name" You have deliberately set-out to ridicule me and make out, i was insinuating different to what i had put into print".. You are Trolling this site and it is detrimental to the Forum and all it.s users. i have exposed you for exactly what you are. which is a TROLL... an internet TROLL who operates on this Forum along with two others.

It is time the moderators took you to task. Because it is now clear what you are up too.

"I've set out to blacken you name?" "What I'm up to?" " I'm a "sad old man?" LOL I'm in my thirties but whatever. I think you're getting senile Sonny.

Yes, Frazier in 73 ( who is what I'm mosty referring too)was a far better fighter than the Holmes who fought Tyson. He was the favored undisputed heavyweight champion. What was Holmes?

A past it former champion, coming off two losses, had not fought in two years. He was also expected to lose by pretty much everybody. It's a ridiculous argument and an example of you minimizing Foreman's win. So don't deny it.

Unless Frazier was fighting at 194 pounds in his prime he wasn't 20 pounds overweight. You just can't tell the truth.

Maybe if Foreman had knocked out Marvis Frazier instead you would have been impressed. That's a great win, right?

Anyway, you're starting to bore me. Unless you come up with some new material don't expect another response.

[joseph5620]

This thread has some pretty brilliant parts. Sonnyboys accusations getting more and more ludicrous

I think he's lost his mind

[Suckmedry]

I think he's lost his mind

you and Scott need to stop tarnishing the careers of ATGs in a bid to glorify the career of Lewis.

[sonnyboyx2]

"I've set out to blacken you name?" "What I'm up to?" " I'm a "sad old man?" LOL I'm in my thirties but whatever. I think you're getting senile Sonny.

Yes, Frazier in 73 ( who is what I'm mosty referring too)was a far better fighter than the Holmes who fought Tyson. He was the favored undisputed heavyweight champion. What was Holmes?

A past it former champion, coming off two losses, had not fought in two years. He was also expected to lose by pretty much everybody. It's a ridiculous argument and an example of you minimizing Foreman's win. So don't deny it.

Unless Frazier was fighting at 194 pounds in his prime he wasn't 20 pounds overweight. You just can't tell the truth.

Maybe if Foreman had knocked out Marvis Frazier instead you would have been impressed. That's a great win, right?

Anyway, you're starting to bore me. Unless you come up with some new material don't expect another response.

So you are claiming Frazier in 73 in Kingston Jamaica was "Prime" even after a World Tour with his Blues Band and weighing 214lbs he was Prime in your opinion..he then went 3-3-1 and was blind in one eye. were Holmes went 23-3 get out of here you troll..

You keep harping on about Marvis Frazier v Mike Tyson being ****e. But that is because you Hate Mike Tyson.. your whole agenda on this forum is based on rubbishing his career and achievements in an attempt to improve your idol Lennox Lewis standing..

[billeau2]

So you are claiming Frazier in 73 in Kingston Jamaica was "Prime" even after a World Tour with his Blues Band and weighing 214lbs he was Prime in your opinion..he then went 3-3-1 and was blind in one eye. were Holmes went 23-3 get out of here you troll..

You keep harping on about Marvis Frazier v Mike Tyson being ****e. But that is because you Hate Mike Tyson.. your whole agenda on this forum is based on rubbishing his career and achievements in an attempt to improve your idol Lennox Lewis standing..

Stick to one handle lefty!! Anyone who disagrees with your idiocy has an agenda right?

[sonnyboyx2]

Stick to one handle lefty!! Anyone who disagrees with your idiocy has an agenda right?

You are the agenda guy... loser!... or should i have called you JAB

[Scott9945]

This thread has some pretty brilliant parts. Sonnyboys accusations getting more and more ludicrous

I believe the clinical term for it is delusional paranoia.

[sonnyboyx2]

This thread has some pretty brilliant parts. Sonnyboys accusations getting more and more ludicrous

One only has to look and read this one page of The History section, To see that i am correct... Joseph & Scott have an agenda which is here for all to see on this page..They had JAB the ex moderator as their side-kick once over, so got away with it. Let's see if Bat & Bear are willing to let them TROLL, Trash & Ridicule like this page shows them to be doing.

There objective is to turn Boxing Scene History Section into The Lennox Lewis Fan Club.. To just keep claiming their hero to be the second or third greatest heavyweight in history (laughable) Anyone who comes on the history section, who does not agree. Will be labelled as a fool etc..They make claim after claim on all Heavyweight topics, Lewis would do this, Lewis would do that etc. This is why the Traffic on this once great site, is at a crawl. Posters have said to themselves F. That... they have seen right through their agenda and abandoned ship.. I have not towed their party line, and have only been posting for a matter of day's. Yet here they are ganging up, trying to ridicule me and get me out of here, because it ruins their agenda. ffs.. Yet never in over 5yrs have they been able to claim what i say about Lewis to be wrong. Every time they claim Lewis could do this or that, they are proved wrong.. They are Trolls of the worst kind...Get rid of em Bat & Bear and the traffic will once again come to this site... i'm outa here !