Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lewis vs Bowe 93 i found this article

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
    Your the only person i have ever came across that does not rate Tysons win over Marvis Frazier as a great win... Every boxing publication in the world had it on their front page. Boxing News the weekly boxing magazine here in the U.K. had headlines of, "The 30 Second Warning".. it was the fight which propelled Mike Tyson into the minds of fight fans worldwide. Every boxing fan was excited as well as shocked at the ferocity of the fight. Fans was asking, "When can we next see this guy Mike Tyson"...But in your book it was a "none event" Nothing Special eh... just another boxing show to watch on tv with nothing new to talk about!... Go away you ****** foolish freak, you and your two honcho's are solely responsible for systematically destroying this forum over the last 4yrs and when confronted with the truth, you both try to squirm out of it like the snakes you both are.. it is my opinion that your knowledge of this sport is very limited, as is your two bum chums` which is why you refer to those with knowledge of the sport, as phonies and liars, in an attempt to improve your own low standing. now f o.



    It's really funny how you consider Tyson's win over Frazier great when you tried to minimize Foreman's KO's over Joe Frazier.


    Marvis Frazier was a small heavyweight who is in no way, shape or form a great win. You had the nerve to include Marvis wins over an ancient Joe Bugner and James Broad as wins over top heavyweights.

    It's a knockout that looks good on You Tube. As usual you're embellishing because it suits your agenda.
    Last edited by joseph5620; 01-22-2015, 04:35 PM.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
      Your the only person i have ever came across that does not rate Tysons win over Marvis Frazier as a great win...
      Tyson vs. Marvis Frazier was called a mis-match going into it.

      Joe Frazier took a lot of heat from pretty much everybody for making that one, popular opinion was he wanted the fight himself as Tyson was being compared to him and he wanted to prove who was better.

      Unable to get into the ring himself he put it on Marvis.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
        Your the only person i have ever came across that does not rate Tysons win over Marvis Frazier as a great win...

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
          It's really funny how you consider Tyson's win over Frazier great when you tried to minimize Foreman's KO's over Joe Frazier.


          Marvis Frazier was a small heavyweight who is in no way, shape or form a great win. You had the nerve to include Marvis wins over an ancient Joe Bugner and James Broad as wins over top heavyweights.

          It's a knockout that looks good on You Tube. As usual you're embellishing because it suits your agenda.
          Were you aware that you and me were responsible for "systematically destroying this forum"? Now I'm feeling a little guilty about all of that.

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
            Were you aware that you and me were responsible for "systematically destroying this forum"? Now I'm feeling a little guilty about all of that.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
              you guys should be ashamed of yourselves! Now go celebrate Tyson's win over marvis Frazier and repeat after me: " Lennox Lewis is a coward for ducking Herbie Hyde."

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
                Yes it is clear for everyone and including the moderators on this site what i have said is true... Joseph, Scott & JAB (billeau2) are responsible for the destruction of this history forum.... lets just take note of how every times one of them posts an objective comment towards another members post, the other two post immediately after (Gang up).. it is plain to see.

                This Forum has been like a ghost-town for the last few years, solely down to these tree clowns and their hatred of fighters. Their agenda is to rubbish every fighter past & present. in order to glorify their hero Lennox Lewis. If it means they have to lie, rubbish and ridicule every poster who posts on this forum, then their "Gang up approach" is their weapon of choice, regardless of the consequences to the forum.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                  It's really funny how you consider Tyson's win over Frazier great when you tried to minimize Foreman's KO's over Joe Frazier.


                  Marvis Frazier was a small heavyweight who is in no way, shape or form a great win. You had the nerve to include Marvis wins over an ancient Joe Bugner and James Broad as wins over top heavyweights.

                  It's a knockout that looks good on You Tube. As usual you're embellishing because it suits your agenda.
                  show me were i have minimized Foreman's win over Frazier

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    hmm
                    Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
                    show me were i have minimized Foreman's win over Frazier
                    As soon as you asked who Foreman Knocked out that was better than Tyson's opponent's you minimized Foreman's victory oved Frazier. Frazier is clearly better than anybody Tyson ever knocked out. But I wouldn't put it past you to make a case for Trevor Berbick because that's how you operate.

                    What makes this funny is you claim Marvis Frazier was a great win. But Joe Frazier wasn't a better one?


                    You questioned whether Frazier in 73 and 76 was in better condition than that version of Holmes which is just ******.


                    All of this is in the "Tyson hits harder than Foreman and Shavers thread." But you already knew that. I don't have to show you anything. It's in there for you and everyone else to read.

                    By the way Sonnyboy, the only thing systematically destroyed in the forum has been you and your lame ass attempts to make up lies and use them as if they were facts.
                    Last edited by joseph5620; 01-23-2015, 04:02 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                      hmm

                      As soon as you asked who Foreman Knocked out that was better than Tyson's opponent's you minimized Foreman's victory oved Frazier. Frazier is clearly better than anybody Tyson ever knocked out. But I wouldn't put it past you to make a case for Trevor Berbick because that's how you operate.

                      What makes this funny is you claim Marvis Frazier was a great win. But Joe Frazier wasn't a better one?


                      You questioned whether Frazier in 73 and 76 was in better condition than that version of Holmes which is just ******.


                      All of this is in the "Tyson hits harder than Foreman and Shavers thread." But you already knew that. I don't have to show you anything. It's in there for you and everyone else to read.

                      By the way Sonnyboy, the only thing systematically destroyed in the forum has been you and your lame ass attempts to make up lies and use them as if they were facts.
                      Show it.. put it up here were i rubbished Foremans win over Frazier... otherwise it proves you to be lying...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP