Name boxers who were stripped of their title belts by corrupt alphabet organizations
Collapse
-
-
This doesn't seem to be so clear cut.
It seems to boils down to whether Chacon signed a contract with Don King that gave him a one fight option prior to his shot at the title against Limon.
If he did, King had stipulated the purse for that next contest at $210,000.
Chacon who made $450,000 against Boza-Edwards obviously wasn't going to accept that kind of money for Camacho.
Sulaiman gave Chacon roughly three week notice to reach an agreement for the fight or be stripped.
When he stripped the title Sulaiman claimed Chacon had been offered $450,000 and a percentage of the gate. (?)
Either way Chacon minus his title went on to face Mancini next and got a career high $575,000.Comment
-
Was referring to it from a legal point of view, not moral.Comment
-
I love the argument that the Klitschkos often raise(d) when it suited them to the effect that "the sanctioned challenger had to be fought." Yeah....because fighters were never stripped of a title temporarily to give the fans the best fight...never would happen! Sarcasm alert.Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Well The Ring used to be THE title to have right? Now that they have this TBRB doing objective rankings, why don't they start awarding title belts at some point and stick to their strict criteria, like Ring used to do? Then fans would know who the best truly is and tell the corrupt alphabet organizations to take a flying leap.Comment
-
Comment
Comment