Bernard Hopkins vs Floyd Mayweather

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jas
    Voice of Reason
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 22498
    • 932
    • 907
    • 1,059,614

    #51
    Hopkins is the better inside fighter

    Mayweather is good inside as displayed in the Hatton fight

    Comment

    • IronDanHamza
      BoxingScene Icon
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2009
      • 48375
      • 4,778
      • 266
      • 104,043

      #52
      Originally posted by likeamulekick
      you can discredit a lot of mayweathers opponents too but just the fact that hes not fought the number 1 welter, puts him down loads in greatness. If he fought pacquio then yeh I would put him ahead of Hopkins
      Mayweather has fought the #1 ranked Welterweight twice. Pacquaio would be the third were they to fight.

      Mayweather has beaten the #1 ranked fighter at the weight being fought in 9 times in his career.

      That's unprecedented for the modern era and something that hasn't happened often in general.

      Comment

      • likeamulekick
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Aug 2011
        • 589
        • 21
        • 0
        • 6,990

        #53
        Originally posted by IronDanHamza
        Mayweather has fought the #1 ranked Welterweight twice. Pacquaio would be the third were they to fight.

        Mayweather has beaten the #1 ranked fighter at the weight being fought in 9 times in his career.

        That's unprecedented for the modern era and something that hasn't happened often in general.
        ducking a mega fight of this magnitude for over 5 years by the champion is also unprecedented. Can you name me any serious greats from the past that could be called chicken and mocked on tv and STILL not pushed for this fight??? No that's exactly why he doesn't belong with the greats. No doubt hes had a great career but you cant rank him with the Alis and the ray Robinsons because of this. Are you telling me that him not fighting pacquio doesn't change anything???
        Last edited by likeamulekick; 11-28-2014, 07:45 PM.

        Comment

        • IronDanHamza
          BoxingScene Icon
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2009
          • 48375
          • 4,778
          • 266
          • 104,043

          #54
          Originally posted by likeamulekick
          ducking a mega fight of this magnitude for over 5 years by the champion is also unprecedented. Can you name me any serious greats from the past that could be called chicken and mocked on tv and STILL not pushed for this fight??? No that's exactly why he doesn't belong with the greats. No doubt hes had a great career but you cant rank him with the Alis and the ray Robinsons because of this. Are you telling me that him not fighting pacquio doesn't change anything???
          Well Pacquaio didn't want the fight either for many years. But that's a completely different and long winded topic.

          And Floyd with or without Pacquaio isn't near Robinson or Ali's level.

          But, he is unquestionably an ATG.

          Comment

          • soul_survivor
            LOL @ Ali-Holmes
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jun 2013
            • 18949
            • 623
            • 473
            • 65,236

            #55
            How can anyone rank Mayweather higher? Bernard was undisputed champion and the number one guy at 175lb on 2 or 3 separate occasions. He always sought out and fought the best and almost always won. He was often let down when facing younger, more athletic foes but he always rebounded and that win over a prime Tito is better than anything on Mayweather's resume.

            Comment

            • jas
              Voice of Reason
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jul 2005
              • 22498
              • 932
              • 907
              • 1,059,614

              #56
              Originally posted by soul_survivor
              How can anyone rank Mayweather higher? Bernard was undisputed champion and the number one guy at 175lb on 2 or 3 separate occasions. He always sought out and fought the best and almost always won. He was often let down when facing younger, more athletic foes but he always rebounded and that win over a prime Tito is better than anything on Mayweather's resume.
              great point about hopkins having the best win

              tito was a beast

              Comment

              • IronDanHamza
                BoxingScene Icon
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2009
                • 48375
                • 4,778
                • 266
                • 104,043

                #57
                Originally posted by soul_survivor
                How can anyone rank Mayweather higher? Bernard was undisputed champion and the number one guy at 175lb on 2 or 3 separate occasions. He always sought out and fought the best and almost always won. He was often let down when facing younger, more athletic foes but he always rebounded and that win over a prime Tito is better than anything on Mayweather's resume.
                There's no question that Trinidad is the best win between them.

                But you could also say Ruben Carter's win over Emile Griffith is better than any win on Hopkins or Floyd's resume combined. But both are vastly greater than Carter.

                Either way, it's close. Both had great careers and both did unprecedented things. It's splitting hairs at this point.

                Comment

                • soul_survivor
                  LOL @ Ali-Holmes
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jun 2013
                  • 18949
                  • 623
                  • 473
                  • 65,236

                  #58
                  Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                  There's no question that Trinidad is the best win between them.

                  But you could also say Ruben Carter's win over Emile Griffith is better than any win on Hopkins or Floyd's resume combined. But both are vastly greater than Carter.

                  Either way, it's close. Both had great careers and both did unprecedented things. It's splitting hairs at this point.
                  I'm not saying Hops over Tito is THE ONLY factor, there's so much light between Hopkins and Floyd it's not even up for debate.

                  Comment

                  • Sugar Adam Ali
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2013
                    • 27630
                    • 970
                    • 1,174
                    • 82,827

                    #59
                    Floyd the better fighter....

                    Resumes about the same..

                    Hopkins has better and bigger wins


                    Still gotta go with floyd.... Floyd has been p4p longer than hopkins... hopkins didn't get p4p till the MW tourney, floyd had already been p4p for 3 years....
                    Plus floyd wouldn't lose his debut, draw with mercado, and look to get out of a fight vs allen

                    I rate floyd higher

                    Comment

                    • IronDanHamza
                      BoxingScene Icon
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Oct 2009
                      • 48375
                      • 4,778
                      • 266
                      • 104,043

                      #60
                      Originally posted by soul_survivor
                      I'm not saying Hops over Tito is THE ONLY factor, there's so much light between Hopkins and Floyd it's not even up for debate.
                      I didn't say you did. Just higignting why that logic isn't always sound.

                      And clearly it is debatable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP