Originally posted by oldgringo
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Rocky Marciano would of..........
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by smasherSTEP 9: Get out of bed at 1:48 AM. Insult SMASHER as a boxrec hunter, check his profile (realize he is much older than me and has likely seen many more fights than I have) then acknowledge he has been around a long time but stick to my original insult of him being a boxrec hunter.
STEP 10: Show a genuine interest in SMASHER'S views by reading all of his previous threads even though I claim he is a misguided boxec hunter then misquote him.
STEP 11: Insult SMASHER again by implying that he's not smart even though I have no knowledge of his formal education, IQ, or type of employment.
STEP 12: Misquote SMASHER once again then ask him direct questions hoping he will answer me so I can talk with him again when I'm feeling lonely in the middle of the night.
STEP 13: Invent fictitious characters and give them names like 'Joe' who will add credibilty to my biased arguments.
Comment
-
Originally posted by butterfly1964they get old sometimes.
the only thing thats dead to me is threads like Ali v Marciano
those threads are dead....forever
Comment
-
Got that right, nobody's ever going to agree so they do get old but sometimes i enjoy talking about him
the only thing thats dead to me is threads like Ali v Marciano
those threads are dead....forever
Comment
-
Originally posted by RockyMarcianofan00you still haven't explained yourself to suzieq so he's gunna keep posting and your going to keep dodging with these steps
Comment
-
I have posted enough on this topic. If smasher would like to debate any of my posts i already made, then go ahead.
my point is walcott and moore were at/or near there best when they fought rocky, and charles was past his prime but was still a great fighter who fought one of the best fights of his career vs rockLast edited by SuzieQ49; 03-07-2006, 05:45 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by smasherI've explained myself repeatedly. The problem with SuzieQ49 is that when he gets shot down he changes the topic. It went from Tiger Lowry probably beating Liston and Frazier losing to Lastarza to suddenly Charles and Walcott were at or near their prime when they fought Marciano. If he wants to debate a topic, then stay on it and justify the analytical statements. That way we can go back and forth, no problem. Debating with a teenager who was spoon fed and brainwashed his boxing opinions by his Daddy who conveniently changes topics when he gets painted into a corner is a wate of my time really. Like Yogi says, let's get onto something else, this is the same old ****...
Frazier could beat LaStarza though, just like Rocky did in the rematch
Comment
-
liston lost to marty marshall, so what makes u think he can go 49-0 against rockys competion under the same circumstances rocku went through entering his fights?
liston lost early in his career to a journeyman, so he very well could do the same if he was fighting marcianos competition under the same circumstances marciano went through entering the fights. if marty marshall beat a green liston, then so could tiger ted lowry
smasher i will not debate you if you keep up with the unwanted personel attacks, i dont see why you need to bring my dad into this or try to belittle me?
does doing that make you feel better?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SuzieQ49liston lost to marty marshall, so what makes u think he can go 49-0 against rockys competion under the same circumstances rocku went through entering his fights?
liston lost early in his career to a journeyman, so he very well could do the same if he was fighting marcianos competition under the same circumstances marciano went through entering the fights. if marty marshall beat a green liston, then so could tiger ted lowry
smasher i will not debate you if you keep up with the unwanted personel attacks, i dont see why you need to bring my dad into this or try to belittle me?
does doing that make you feel better?
Comment
Comment