Who would you rank higher p4p, Gene Tunney or Barney Ross? The IBRO ranks Tunney 20th with Ross "just missing the cut". With all due respect to the esteemed members of that organization, I'm not sure I agree. Like Tunney, Ross fought most of the best at and around his weight. Unlike Tunney he never drew the color line. What is your perspective on why one should be rated higher than the other?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who should rank higher p4p?
Collapse
-
I would say Barney Ross would most likely rank higher for me. Even though Tunney was a pioneer for heavyweight boxing with his style, and beat Dempsey twice, I think Barney Ross had wins that were equal, better than or comparable to those wins, such as his victories over McLarnin and Canzoneri.
Smart boxer, as was Tunney - I think he also showed a tremendous amount of heart vs a true great in Henry Armstrong.
Overall, I would have Ross slightly higher than Tunney.
Then again, Tunney is one of the best LHWs of all times in my opinion, probably top 3 and definitely top 5.
Damn, it's a tough one.Last edited by LacedUp; 01-13-2014, 06:39 PM.
-
Originally posted by mickey maloneGuess you meant, Harry Greb?
But yes, very tough to decide, prefer Tunney, but only because Ross was a light puncher.. Skillswise, it's a dead heat and both have excellent resumes.
Comment
-
Resume wise I give the nod to Ross... I think he gets overrated a lot but his resume is better than Tunney.
H2h I think Tunney beats him on points and skill wise is slightly better..
Very close caliber of fighters and on an atg list I would probably have them very close to each other
Comment
-
Originally posted by LacedUp View PostNo I was referring to Barney Ross's fight against Armstrong.
Comment
-
Comment