Cj Ross:Most corrupt judge in my lifetime.

[wpdougie2180]

ON the official cards unless all 3 judges are blind then her judging wasn't that terrible as everyone is making it out to be (and for the record I thought Mayweather won decisively) the only rounds that another judge didn't agree that Canelo won was rd 1 & 8 so what does that mean?????

[billeau2]

hahahaha you're a ******, I knew it.

If you can't watch a fight and see that May's activity dropped than you must be. Seriously, do you need some sort of visual enhancement to view fights? If you're semi-blind I understand.



I'm not saying the fight was a draw, do you know how to read? What language do you want me to type in?

I said Floyd won but he made it close enough for some people to see it closer than the so called virtuoso performance make it out to be. CJ Ross may well be corrupt, the evidence stacks up against her but there can be an argument for honest people scoring the fight a draw.

A friend of mine who used train guys at the Pea**** gym had Mayweather winning by 2-3 points max and he is the biggest Mayweather fan I know.

Small errors have a bad habit of compounding. In any situation where this can happen there is usually a fail safe of some sort or another. In real estate appraisal it was drummed into us that any small error by itself, nothing important, had the potential to screw up an appraisal when compounded by perhaps another small error along the way.

I am using this example because professional judges need to not ever let small errors in a close fight, compound and cause a wrong decision. If two judges decided that the fight was close, and either ommitted a point for Mayweather, or gave a point to Canelo that was not warranted, it has the potential to produce a really bad decision. And this happens a lot in boxing. On the other hand If one has the fight with Mayweather comfortably ahead and makes an error regarding a round (for example) it should not be a big deal.

I think it is an error to see this fight as close and that it perhaps caused this judge to compound a series of errors. Seeing it as close opens the door to compounding this error by giving a point, a round here or there and suddenly through a chain of events....the wrong guy gets his hand raised.

By the way "Maharishi" I want to make one thing clear....I don't care what your rep bar reads, I respect your point of view and every poster's point of view.

[Marcomolinero]

Make sure this humean dude never judges a fight lol

[_Rexy_]

Jesus there were people defending a draw.......people saying they gave Canelo FIVE rounds?


so this site has always been full of ******s then

[Willie Pep 229]

I took only a quick look at CJ Ross

1. That was her last fight and she retired/quit/removed right after.

2. When you look at her final 12 fights her scores are never an outlier, always in agreement with at least one other judge and often in the middle.

One fight with an outlier score shouldn't get one labeled corrupt - a rush to judgement literally based on one fight (IMHO)

[joseph5620]

Jesus there were people defending a draw.......people saying they gave Canelo FIVE rounds?


so this site has always been full of ******s then

it's funny because I forgot about this thread. Looking at it 8 years later and people giving Canelo 5 rounds is a reminder that some things never change

[markusmod]

it's funny because I forgot about this thread. Looking at it 8 years later and people giving Canelo 5 rounds is a reminder that some things never change

Throwback Tuesday?

[joseph5620]

Throwback Tuesday?

Yeah it feels like it

[_Rexy_]

it's funny because I forgot about this thread. Looking at it 8 years later and people giving Canelo 5 rounds is a reminder that some things never change

Pretty sure I gave Canelo one round, and it was in the same way a girl might throw some ***** at a dude for trying hard and making her laugh.