Spinks has been significantly faster than all of his opponents I think he'll struggle going against Roy who's actually much faster than he is.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mike Spinks vs RJJ
Collapse
-
-
-
Originally posted by crold1 View PostI think Spinks range makes all the difference. He was 6'2/6'3. He'd have 4-5 inches on Jones.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MRBOOMER View PostI expected a much more in depth post from you kinda let me down there man. Now I'm just waiting for poet and iron Dan and the dude with the Emanuel steward avy
Poet
Comment
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostWhile I think the two are pretty close in talent (Jones obviously has an edge in physical gifts, Spinks having the edge in technical skills), I've always a sneaking su****ion Spinks would have Jones' number. Spinks had an odd quirky style that was a cast-iron b1tch to figure out (remember how much trouble Jones had with Montell Griffin? Griffin's style was similar to Spinks' while having half of Spinks' talent). You could physically overmatch Spinks like Tyson did but that's not how Jones fought.
Poet
Comment
-
Jones was a great athletic talent and had a smart brain for boxing,,,,
But i do think spinks was a better fighter, especially at lhw,,, Spinks dominated a lhw division that was stacked, while roy cleared out the division but it wasnt the strongest,,,
I think spinks would trouble roy with size, strength, deceptive speed, and most importantly his awkward style,,, I think spinks would cause roy alot of problems just like tarver did to jones,,,
This wouldnt be a blow out fight, but i think spinks gets a late ko,,,, He had underrated speed and timing that i think would bothered roy during the fight,,,, Much like how montell griffith bother roy in the first fight with that double jab,,,,
Roy had fundamental flaws that could be exposed, but he was such an amazing athlete that he could get away with alot of things other boxers couldnt... But i figure with another ATG lhw like spinks, jones' flaws would get exposed down the stretch run of the fight......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sugar Adam Ali View Posti consider spinks to be the best lhw of all time,, i can see where you put him top 5, maybe not 1...
Comment
-
Originally posted by young_robbed View Postreally, the best of all time? I find that VERY hard to agree with considering how deep that division is. you got Charles, Harold Johnson, Moore, Conn, Foster, Tunney, Langford, Greb, Bivins, etc. Spinks would be in my top 10 but barely, I don't think he has the resume for that.
I can see where others could rank higher, but me personally spinks was a beast at lhw,, i think he had 8 defenses all by ko.....
i think spinks ia better than bob foster,,,,
Spinks might not be #1 ever,,, he is to me, but i can see your point, no disagreement from me,,,, but he is def a top 10,,,
Where does roy rank in you lhw rankings
Comment
-
Originally posted by young_robbed View Postreally, the best of all time? I find that VERY hard to agree with considering how deep that division is. you got Charles, Harold Johnson, Moore, Conn, Foster, Tunney, Langford, Greb, Bivins, etc. Spinks would be in my top 10 but barely, I don't think he has the resume for that.
Some posters mention then Montell fight...thats a great piece of data, that and DeValle's flash knockdown. And what about Tarver? granted this came later but Tarver, who is a relatively orthodox light heavy was always competative with Jones (KO or not). Guys like Spinks and Foster were better than Tarver and probably going to catch Jones at some point.
Comment
Comment