It's a good question that tangentially attaches to what the thread has moved, to, and with humility I am certain that I can speak to it. Among my areas of personal interest are not only Boxing, but the broader spectrum of Hand to hand combat, Martial arts, Grappling, etc. I think the brief answer is still highly conditional. For all but the very newest martial arts, you will find avid traditionalists, who beleive that their art was fully formed many generations ago. You will also find aficionados espousing the Jack Dempsey > Bruce Lee > Gracie clan concepts of eclecticism (Take what is useful). But between Master adhered martial arts and fight sports, there is an ENORMOUS difference in developmental pace, because rather than the goal of proficiency being measured by replication of the Masters/schools techniques, in all combat sports the goal is to live inside the rules and do WHATEVER WORKS to WIN. Boxing has been practiced this way for centuries. Even before equipment updates and duration rounds or breaks. It reached full stylistical
maturity a very, very long time ago.
I have hung around the sport's foremost historian experts for decades talking shop, and there are few things in life that I am more sure of than that!
Some halfwit thinking he sees something better watching YouTube??? Well, maybe....but don't take too long about it cuz' those toilets aren't gonna clean themselves.
maturity a very, very long time ago.
I have hung around the sport's foremost historian experts for decades talking shop, and there are few things in life that I am more sure of than that!
Some halfwit thinking he sees something better watching YouTube??? Well, maybe....but don't take too long about it cuz' those toilets aren't gonna clean themselves.
Comment