espn's top 50 fighters alltime as of 2007

[studentofthegam]

looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooooooooooooool

where is naseem hamed?????????????????????????????

l0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000l

I thought someone might get a kick out of that.

[Barn]

I thought someone might get a kick out of that.

I definitely did.

[IronDanHamza]

Oscar in the Top 50 fighters of all time

No Pacquaio?

Ohhhhhhhhh how times have changed in the casual world of Boxing.

[Big Op]

Oscar in the Top 50 fighters of all time

No Pacquaio?

Ohhhhhhhhh how times have changed in the casual world of Boxing.

too bad your opinion means **** lol

[IronDanHamza]

too bad your opinion means **** lol

Clearly, neither does ESPN's.

[JAB5239]

For all you guys getting ****** into this troll thread, this was the criteria used to compile this list.

In-ring Performance
Achievements
Dominance
Mainstream Appeal

Not resume
not longevity
Not quality of opponent

In other words its a joke!

[NChristo]

Mainstream appeal used to measure how great a boxer is but not their quality of opponent ?.

If that's the case then Naseem probably should be top 50, jus sayin.

[JAB5239]

Mainstream appeal used to measure how great a boxer is but not their quality of opponent ?.

If that's the case then Naseem probably should be top 50, jus sayin.

It's a messed up list that shows no consistency toward its own criteria. If it did Tyson would have to rank much, much higher than 50. The list is a joke!

[Big Op]

yes but this is the criteria they go for nowadays

In-ring Performance
Achievements
Dominance
Mainstream Appeal

[The Surgeon]

I cant get down with that list, not one bit. It sux.

Theres alot of great fighters in there but i argue their positioning, and ther are actually a few odd picks in the full stop.