He edited that in later. He originally had it 91-2011 which the is the last 21 years which the thread title still states. And a win over Nelson put him in the top 10 but definitely in the lower half.
If we are giving fantasy wins then he still wouldn't be over Barrera who has fantasy wins over Morales(1st fight) Marquez and Junior Jones
Morales x3 Hamed Marquez Jones Mckinney Tapia Ayala
are far greater then
Nelson McGirt x2 Chavez(above 140) Vasquez Pineda Wilfredo Rivera x2
If you claim other wise then you simply do not know **** about boxing
You genuinely dont think Pea belongs in the top 10 of the last twenty years?
Do you ever wonder why your the laughing stock of the history section? Im sorry but insulting IronDanHamza who happens too be a very good poster wont help you understand the sport of boxing at all,listening would help,but you clearly arent able too do that
You genuinely dont think Pea belongs in the top 10 of the last twenty years?
Do you ever wonder why your the laughing stock of the history section? Im sorry but insulting IronDanHamza who happens too be a very good poster wont help you understand the sport of boxing at all,listening would help,but you clearly arent able too do that
From 91-present NO His resume simply does not stand up. 90-present he is somewhere from 10-8 clearly below guys like Barrera
And yes I realize that opinions have been formed here and everybody takes them as fact and anybody who has a different opinion is a laughing stock.
Why? He beat Nelson at a weight he never won a fight at. He fantasy beat Chavez at a weight Chavez accomplished nothing at.
Yeah, but I don't think the weight was much of a factor in either fight. It's just not the same across the board. I don't think the weight was a factor for Nelson, he was strong throughout and may have even finished the stronger fighter. He was simply outmatched by a young, fleet-footed defensive genius in his prime. I still think Nelson knocked him down at least once that wasn't counted .
The more I think about it, the more I wanna move Pea higher.
Sick list and I enjoyed the explanations, but I think Whitaker has to be number one or 2 the very least, he has by far the best secondary wins out of everyone, he beat better contenders through that time period to compliment those "glossy wins". Though he looked **** against Rivera and Hurtado he still holds legitimate wins over them and it still counts to his resume. I also think its pretty clear that he has the least embarrassing losses of the 3 mentioned, though I don't put too much stock into them, it counts for something. in addition, he probably has the single best win (I don't give a **** about the judges Trojan), it has to be Pea for me.
All props to you for making the list, I don't think I could commit to a top 10.
Sick list and I enjoyed the explanations, but I think Whitaker has to be number one or 2 the very least, he has by far the best secondary wins out of everyone, he beat better contenders through that time period to compliment those "glossy wins". Though he looked **** against Rivera and Hurtado he still holds legitimate wins over them and it still counts to his resume. I also think its pretty clear that he has the least embarrassing losses of the 3 mentioned, though I don't put too much stock into them, it counts for something. in addition, he probably has the single best win (I don't give a **** about the judges Trojan), it has to be Pea for me.
All props to you for making the list, I don't think I could commit to a top 10.
Barely five minutes passed and I changed it lol. Took out Lennox and inserted Evander before Lopez. Yeah, the more I think about it, the more I want to place Pea #1. I don't know, man.
Comment