JCC - Camacho - JLR - Rosario

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SCtrojansbaby
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 5951
    • 136
    • 72
    • 12,653

    #1

    JCC - Camacho - JLR - Rosario

    Rank there fights against each other in terms of excitement.

    And no one mentions it but they actually produced much better fights then Hearns Hagler Duran and Leonard
    Last edited by SCtrojansbaby; 05-16-2011, 11:00 PM.
  • SCtrojansbaby
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 5951
    • 136
    • 72
    • 12,653

    #2
    bump .

    Comment

    • Boxing Bob
      Mexico = GOAT :mexico1:
      • Apr 2011
      • 1644
      • 72
      • 0
      • 7,899

      #3
      give us your opinoin first so we can pick it apart with no facts instead of the other way around

      Comment

      • jabsRstiff
        ! ! ! !
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2004
        • 8964
        • 498
        • 136
        • 16,167

        #4
        Chavez destroyed Camacho and Rosario...and his fight with Ramirez was a glorified sparring session (literally) in which Julio clearly carried his buddy.

        Camacho easily outboxed JLR. His fight with Rosario was not exactly one with sustained action. It was very dramatic in that Camacho was in danger throughout the bout.

        Chapo vs. JLR I was a pretty evenly fought match that could have gone either way. It was a very good fight, but not what I would consider great. The rematch was truly a great fight, and it's the only one of the bunch (of this group in the thread title) that can match up to Hagler-Hearns for excellence.
        Last edited by jabsRstiff; 05-17-2011, 12:16 PM.

        Comment

        • Pastrano
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Feb 2011
          • 2155
          • 65
          • 35
          • 8,983

          #5
          I always thought JLR was underrated. He not only koed Rosario, he also beat (wether you consider it legit or not) Whitaker, the first one to do so. Also stopped the tough Boza Edwards in 5 rounds. And he deserved to get the decision against Arguello too, who he decked. One of the greatest ko records also, 82 out of 102!

          Comment

          • IronDanHamza
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2009
            • 48371
            • 4,778
            • 266
            • 104,043

            #6
            Originally posted by Pastrano
            I always thought JLR was underrated. He not only koed Rosario, he also beat (wether you consider it legit or not) Whitaker, the first one to do so. Also stopped the tough Boza Edwards in 5 rounds. And he deserved to get the decision against Arguello too, who he decked. One of the greatest ko records also, 82 out of 102!
            If your going to give him credit for beating Whitaker than you can't give him credit for losing to Arguello. Can't work both ways.

            Plus, the Arguello-Ramirez fight was much closer than the Whitaker-Ramirez fight which was one of the worst robberies in the history of Boxing.

            For the record I had Ramirez beating Arguello by a point, the KD being the difference.

            Ramirez is an underrated fighter, though.

            Comment

            • jabsRstiff
              ! ! ! !
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2004
              • 8964
              • 498
              • 136
              • 16,167

              #7
              I really liked JLR, and do believe he is underappreciated, but.....

              He not only was easily handled by Camacho,Chavez, and Whitaker....but, let's not forget that a very young Ray Mancini bullied him and beat him quite easily, and that was just a few months after JLR had given Arguello such a tough time.

              He had some great wins and some really close, tough losses, but he also had some clear defeats....and that does hold him back.

              Comment

              • Pastrano
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Feb 2011
                • 2155
                • 65
                • 35
                • 8,983

                #8
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                If your going to give him credit for beating Whitaker than you can't give him credit for losing to Arguello. Can't work both ways.

                Plus, the Arguello-Ramirez fight was much closer than the Whitaker-Ramirez fight which was one of the worst robberies in the history of Boxing.

                For the record I had Ramirez beating Arguello by a point, the KD being the difference.

                Ramirez is an underrated fighter, though.
                GTFOH! If THAT was one of the worst robberies in history, then what was DLH-Trinidad or Zarate-Pintor?! Come on...you people with your blind worship of Whitaker...he faking RAN entire fight, I SEEN that fight man! He ran! You seriously telling me he DESERVED that fight?! Bs!

                Comment

                • IronDanHamza
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 48371
                  • 4,778
                  • 266
                  • 104,043

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Pastrano
                  GTFOH! If THAT was one of the worst robberies in history, then what was DLH-Trinidad or Zarate-Pintor?! Come on...you people with your blind worship of Whitaker...he faking RAN entire fight, I SEEN that fight man! He ran! You seriously telling me he DESERVED that fight?! Bs!
                  Blind worship of Whitaker? How's that?

                  Saying he was robbed against Ramirez isn't "Blind worship" it's simple vision. Whitaker not only clearly won the fight but he pretty much dominated the fight.

                  It is on the same level of those robberies, definitely.

                  Yes, he definitely deserved to beat Ramirez, no doubt at all.

                  IMO, The Ramirez fight was the clearest win of Whitakers controverisal descions.

                  Comment

                  • joseph5620
                    undisputed
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 15564
                    • 3,040
                    • 5,610
                    • 71,615

                    #10
                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza
                    Blind worship of Whitaker? How's that?

                    Saying he was robbed against Ramirez isn't "Blind worship" it's simple vision. Whitaker not only clearly won the fight but he pretty much dominated the fight.

                    It is on the same level of those robberies, definitely.

                    Yes, he definitely deserved to beat Ramirez, no doubt at all.

                    IMO, The Ramirez fight was the clearest win of Whitakers controverisal descions.






                    Anybody who disagrees with that clearly has an agenda.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP