Roberto Duran

[DarkTerror88]

Roberto Duran

i see you are trying to get back on topic. allow me to assist you.

I think that if Duran didnt party and was a gym rat, along with taking every fight seriously (ala vs Leonard I) he would have beaten most of those that he lost to. Maybe not Hearns or Hagler, might have still quit against leonard II, but as he fought in the late 80s and 90s he would have won more often had he gained better habits early on in his career.

He also KOd a horse and had pet lions, thats always a win.

[joseph5620]

Trolling? Lol.

I suppose you think Morrison was inferior to the 70's fighters as well?

How would you explain him beating Foreman then?

I'll save us both some time and play out the conversation.

YOU: He was old.

ME: He was a better boxer at that time than in the 70's.

YOU: He was old.

ME: He had just had a great fight with Evander Holyfield and was right in it.

YOU: He was old.

ME: He went on right after and knocked out unbeaten 35-0 Michael Moorer in his next fight.

YOU: He was old, and won on a lucky punch.ME: He went on to win his next fight against a prime Axel Schulz.

YOU: Whatever, Morrison ******, you're ******. You fall under that catagory.........

I'm done. Those who won't get it is because they don't want to. I have no more time for this.

You: Morrison would knock Ali's opponents out cold

Me: Morrison couldn't even knock out an over 40 version of George Foreman

You: Morrison was a white version of Joe Frazier


Me. Really? I never saw Frazier getting knocked out and barely surviving against fighters on the level of Ray Mercer, Ross Puritty and Michael Bentt.

You: You're a racist and don't like white fighters


Me: Keep trolling....

[Vadrigar.]

I'll start by saying how fun this has been talking to a brick wall..........

An all too familiar statement by stubborn trolls, like yourself.

Next, saying there's nothing wrong with with what you say, being your opinion is so ridiculous I just don't quite know how to get through to you so I won't try. And moderators don't ban for opinions smart guy.

Moderators ban for trolling so I suggest you stop fool.

The 70's may be considered to be the 'golden age' of hvywt boxing but that doesn't neccesarily mean it was the most talented.

Please tell me what's so talented about the fatties and juicers of today?

Can you sit here and honestly say you think Gerry Quarry would be a competitive fighter today?

The fact that you've asked this question shows your ignorance of that era.

Or Chuvalo? How about Karl Mildenberger? Come on man, show you have some common sense or even sanity.

That's what I should be telling you.

I understand the need to glorify legends and all but enough is enough, the fighters of the 70's don't compare to todays fighters.

I know you like glorifying fatties, but you are right in that statement. They're not fit to carry the 70's jockstrap.

The only advantage they had was activity.

Lastly, I didn't compare boxing to golf.

Yes you did genius.

Maybe you got lost in that thinking about typing and eating and when the next cartoon was coming on.

There's no need to tell me your activities.

But if you A) Think Wladimir was at his best in that fight or B) Feel like Sanders was a bum, I have to say you are pretty much an idiot.

I've already told you what Sanders was, but anyway I was using YOUR own logic against you.

I'm done taking you to school.

Why aren't you in school?

[StarshipTrooper]

You are on my ignore list but I had a feeling that you were responding to me so I'll write back one last time. You have honestly got to be the most narrow minded hating fool this forum has ever produced and If I never see another post from you again it will be too soon. Hope you enjoyed talking blind ignorance to me so often because those were the last words of yours that will ever be read by me. Enjoy.

Well gee it must be your lucky day cuz you get the bonus plan.....here's another post for you to read :geek9:

[StarshipTrooper]

It's called an opinion but apparently you are also too dense to understand that. F off.

Opinions are like azzholes: The wrong people have them and they're all full of ****.....especially yours so you better wipe your hole REAL good :geek9:

Poet

[JAB5239]

Ok, you are ****** for being a Cowboy fan.............

Thats ok it doesn't hurt my feelings. I've been a Cowboys fan for 35 years and proud of it. 8 Super Bowl appearances, 5 wins.

See how ignorant that sounds? Grow up.

What sounds ignorant is calling Tommy Morrison a "white" Joe Frazier. Morrison was an offensive beast, but he couldn't take a punch, lacked great stamina and never succeeded any where near the level of Frazier. I think its you who needs to grow up son.

[Mr. Invincible]

If you honesty believe that 45 year old Foreman is better than his 70s version, I feel pity for you.

Morrison was a good fighter, but had a major failing in his chin. you cant honestly think that he would have beaten Ali like Frazier did, do you?

Maybe you and others have confused what I've said. Maybe that's why I'm so hated here. I'll repeat what I said. Once.

Morrison would have KO'd most of Ali's competition. When one looks closely into Tommy's record, you can find that he was only truly dominated by a legend in Lennox Lewis. The Bentt fight was a fluke while the Mercer fight Tommy had clearly under control until getting caught. It's boxing, it happens.

What this all means is that I think the 90's crop of heavyweights were a better bunch than the 70's and that the crop today are only looking so bad because of Klitschko dominance.

[Mr. Invincible]

You: Morrison would knock Ali's opponents out cold

Me: Morrison couldn't even knock out an over 40 version of George Foreman

You: Morrison was a white version of Joe Frazier


Me. Really? I never saw Frazier getting knocked out and barely surviving against fighters on the level of Ray Mercer, Ross Puritty and Michael Bentt.

You: You're a racist and don't like white fighters


Me: Keep trolling....

Hmm, where do I start?

I won't. Have fun in delusion.

[Steak]

Maybe you and others have confused what I've said. Maybe that's why I'm so hated here. I'll repeat what I said. Once.

Morrison would have KO'd most of Ali's competition. When one looks closely into Tommy's record, you can find that he was only truly dominated by a legend in Lennox Lewis. The Bentt fight was a fluke while the Mercer fight Tommy had clearly under control until getting caught. It's boxing, it happens.

What this all means is that I think the 90's crop of heavyweights were a better bunch than the 70's and that the crop today are only looking so bad because of Klitschko dominance.

so you think Morrison would have KOed Foreman, Frazier, Liston, Patterson, Norton, etc...?

do I have to remind you that two 70s Heavyweights, Holmes and Foreman, both had success in the 90s even though they over 40 and obviously way past it?

how about the fact that 45 year old Holmes beat Mercer one sidedly, when Morrison got KOed by him and Lewis struggled with him?

[Mr. Invincible]

An all too familiar statement by stubborn trolls, like yourself.




Moderators ban for trolling so I suggest you stop fool.



Please tell me what's so talented about the fatties and juicers of today?



The fact that you've asked this question shows your ignorance of that era.



That's what I should be telling you.



I know you like glorifying fatties, but you are right in that statement. They're not fit to carry the 70's jockstrap.







Yes you did genius.



There's no need to tell me your activities.



I've already told you what Sanders was, but anyway I was using YOUR own logic against you.



Why aren't you in school?

I seriously stopped reading when you made mention that you think Quarry would be competitive against a Klitschko. I realize now that this discussion is pointless.

Maybe I should move to another topic on nsb where people aren't lost in time. (aka: delusion)