Originally posted by BigStereotype
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Roberto Duran
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostHere's a hint: It AIN'T you :geek9:
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Invincible View PostIt's called an opinion but apparently you are also too dense to understand that. F off.
Yeah everybody is entitled to their opinion no matter how ****** it is. Guess what category you fall under?
Nobody takes you seriously. Either stop posting or keep trolling. The choice is yours.
Comment
-
Originally posted by -D33Pwaters- View PostYeah, suuuuure.........
No one calls me out because there's nothing wrong with what I say. I would be banned by the moderator of this section if that was the case.
Well they may be better at munching down burgers, but nothing much else. The 70's is considered as the golden era of HW's and you're ******ed to say otherwise.
Boxing is a totally different sport to golf, go back to the shed.
Wladimir didn't even see the 3rd round against Corrie Sanders, an out of shape professional golfer. Oh yes, I guess golf does come in here
You're blind then.
This statement shows you don't really know much about Frazier and Norton.
Next, saying there's nothing wrong with with what you say, being your opinion is so ridiculous I just don't quite know how to get through to you so I won't try. And moderators don't ban for opinions smart guy.
The 70's may be considered to be the 'golden age' of hvywt boxing but that doesn't neccesarily mean it was the most talented. Can you sit here and honestly say you think Gerry Quarry would be a competitive fighter today? Or Chuvalo? How about Karl Mildenberger? Come on man, show you have some common sense or even sanity.
I understand the need to glorify legends and all but enough is enough, the fighters of the 70's don't compare to todays fighters. The only advantage they had was activity.
Lastly, I didn't compare boxing to golf. Maybe you got lost in that thinking about typing and eating and when the next cartoon was coming on. But if you A) Think Wladimir was at his best in that fight or B) Feel like Sanders was a bum, I have to say you are pretty much an idiot.
I'm done taking you to school. I would normally ask for a daily wage for this type of lesson.
Comment
-
Originally posted by joseph5620 View PostYeah everybody is entitled to their opinion no matter how ****** it is. Guess what category you fall under?
Nobody takes you seriously. Either stop posting or keep trolling. The choice is yours.
I suppose you think Morrison was inferior to the 70's fighters as well?
How would you explain him beating Foreman then?
I'll save us both some time and play out the conversation.
YOU: He was old.
ME: He was a better boxer at that time than in the 70's.
YOU: He was old.
ME: He had just had a great fight with Evander Holyfield and was right in it.
YOU: He was old.
ME: He went on right after and knocked out unbeaten 35-0 Michael Moorer in his next fight.
YOU: He was old, and won on a lucky punch.
ME: He went on to win his next fight against a prime Axel Schulz.
YOU: Whatever, Morrison ******, you're ******. You fall under that catagory.........
I'm done. Those who won't get it is because they don't want to. I have no more time for this.Last edited by Mr. Invincible; 04-24-2011, 03:36 PM.
Comment
-
If you honesty believe that 45 year old Foreman is better than his 70s version, I feel pity for you.
Morrison was a good fighter, but had a major failing in his chin. you cant honestly think that he would have beaten Ali like Frazier did, do you?
Comment
Comment