Manny Pacqiuao a Top 25 all time great??
Collapse
-
Personally, I can't see Manny Pacqiuao beating Floyd Mayweather.
But if Manny were to prove me wrong and win, in impressive fashion. Man, it would be incredible and I agree I would be utterly shocked. Something I haven't been with Manny since he beat Barrera from pillar to post.
So yeah, beating Floyd would really enhance his legacy for me.
I agree it will be if he comes back and has a tune up and looks good or as good as he has then I can't see there being any room for excuses.Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbabyLOL what is ******ed is comparing a boxer from the 30s who you have probable only seen highlights of on youtube to a boxer from the year 2011.Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbabyLOL what is ******ed is comparing a boxer from the 30s who you have probable only seen highlights of on youtube to a boxer from the year 2011.Comment
-
Originally posted by SCtrojansbabyLOL what is ******ed is comparing a boxer from the 30s who you have probable only seen highlights of on youtube to a boxer from the year 2011.Comment
-
Well obviously its easy to rack up achievements 4-5x as many fightsComment
-
Robinson
Greb
Langford
Charles
Armstrong
Moore
Wilde
Monzon
Ali
Louis
Pep
Whitaker
Gans
B.Leonard
R.Leoanrd
Gavilan
Arguello
Fitzsimmons
Griffith
Walker
Jofre
Napoles
Ketchel
Tunney
Mclarnin
That was the first 25 that came to my head that I listed. Who I feel are all greater than Manny Pacqiuao as it stands.
That's without; Duran, Ross, Walcott, and many others.
So yeah, I just can't see it, personally.
but who did whitaker beat that gets him so high yet pacquiao has no chance ?
not to say i think pacquiao is that high on the atg list, i dont care about atg lists and i do think whitaker should be higher cuz he fought some other considered "atg's", but pacquiao has come a long way too, should'nt be that far behind whitaker should he?, just curiousLast edited by SplitSecond; 04-23-2011, 02:10 PM.Comment
-
It only takes common sense to realize comparing guys who fought anywhere from 6-12x a year to guys who fights 2 maybe 3 or 4x a year is dumb. if Pacquiao fought 8x a year like Barney Ross he probable would have unified a ton of belts who cares that isn't the sport of boxing and hasn't been for 40 years.
It only takes common sense to realize it was his choice not to fight as many times or unify any divisions. Picking money fights instead of trying to unify is his choice. If you want to be better than the next guy you have to surpass his feats. That is the bottom line. And fighting all the best comp is far more impressive than skipping around 17 divisions picking up paper titles.Comment
-
It only takes common sense to realize it was his choice not to fight as many times or unify any divisions. Picking money fights instead of trying to unify is his choice. If you want to be better than the next guy you have to surpass his feats. That is the bottom line. And fighting all the best comp is far more impressive than skipping around 17 divisions picking up paper titles.
lol got news for you that is modern boxing NOBODY fights 10x a year like Barney Ross or Sugar Ray Robinson. That is why if you had common sense you would realize that its dumb to compare them.Comment
-
Comment
Comment