How does Dempsey match up against the 90's giant heavyweights?

[JAB5239]

No it is a fiction joe remember I told you the joe you talk of who has advanced movement i talk of and wasnt slow and stiff and I said those quotes all are true for this version and no you can't prove the advances and not being slow or stiff for this ver cause its no vid of this person he never existed only in your mind and other crazy people

My joe On video has mutiple missing advances and was slow and stiff why your still trying to make me put the real joe and fiction joe as the same fighter is beyond me im not doing that i told you more then once to no quotes can go over vid for this version of him

I said and will always argee to all those thing sfor the fiction joe only now we can move on from that you have to find somebody else to try to force the stuff I said for the fiction joe to be placed on my joe on video

My list is coming still you know im here every week I wont forget

You're the only person I ever heard say he was "slow and stiff". And you have never provided any proof of these so called advances. On top of that....we're all waiting for you list of (at least) 20 better heavyweights than Louis. More than two weeks and you've still shown nothing.

[Ascended]

You're the only person I ever heard say he was "slow and stiff". And you have never provided any proof of these so called advances. On top of that....we're all waiting for you list of (at least) 20 better heavyweights than Louis. More than two weeks and you've still shown nothing.

Youtube and other people have said the real joe on video is slow and stiff and I have proved mutiple times he was on video you cant see remember

Why do you keep trying to get me to say the real joe is like the fiction joe I already argeed the fiction joe was the best skilled its as much as I can do

if you or anybody could prove me wrong with the real joe yea I would agree but nobody will and can't do that

[JAB5239]

Youtube and other people have said the real joe on video is slow and stiff and I have proved mutiple times he was on video you cant see remember

Why do you keep trying to get me to say the real joe is like the fiction joe I already argeed the fiction joe was the best skilled its as much as I can do

if you or anybody could prove me wrong with the real joe yea I would agree but nobody will and can't do that

You haven't proven a thing. You seem to forget your opinion has been laughed at and rebuked by several posters including myself. You say Louis is slow and stiff but you have been proven wrong time and again. Not only by myself and others here, but by the words of boxing trainers and fighters.

You're boring me now son. I knew you wouldn't provide that list, because you can't. You see, the real Joe Louis is very difficult to rate anyone in history above him, let alone the 20 heavyweights you promised us. Get back to me when you post that list.

[QueensburyRules]

Well if you could read good I said my list isnt based on resumes can you find anywhere you ever seen me say who beat who or who lost?

And leon was skilled i wont give you the breakdown for him yet but he might be on that list joe might be there to you will see

- - And so I await with baited breath...

[Ascended]

You haven't proven a thing. You seem to forget your opinion has been laughed at and rebuked by several posters including myself. You say Louis is slow and stiff but you have been proven wrong time and again. Not only by myself and others here, but by the words of boxing trainers and fighters.

You're boring me now son. I knew you wouldn't provide that list, because you can't. You see, the real Joe Louis is very difficult to rate anyone in history above him, let alone the 20 heavyweights you promised us. Get back to me when you post that list.

I haven't proved the fiction joe wasnt slow and stiff cause he wasnt the real joe was though

no words or footage you haven't proved me wrong you cant prove the real joe is like you said I asked you before to show me video you wont like others who cant cause I have said mutiple times i only care about visual so nothing else matters so why your still saying quotes for the fiction. Joe is odd

you cant for a fact prove me wrong by video of joe using advances in movement they had in 70s-90s if you could you would had been done it weeks agweekly The list is coming still im not mad why are you still trying to force me to say the real joe is like the fiction I dont know

Its lots of people 70s-90s that have way more skill and way more advanced movement then the real ioe on video and if you could see which I know you cant you would be able to see that its easy to see

I'll say agian so you know I want visual proof only nothing else matters visual only visual man thats it

[P to the J]

You haven't proven a thing. You seem to forget your opinion has been laughed at and rebuked by several posters including myself. You say Louis is slow and stiff but you have been proven wrong time and again. Not only by myself and others here, but by the words of boxing trainers and fighters.

You're boring me now son. I knew you wouldn't provide that list, because you can't. You see, the real Joe Louis is very difficult to rate anyone in history above him, let alone the 20 heavyweights you promised us. Get back to me when you post that list.

LOL. This site is way better, and way more aggro than any social media platform, and bluntness like this is exactly why.

[Willie Pep 229]

LOL. This site is way better, and way more aggro than any social media platform, and bluntness like this is exactly why.

That's because on most forums the moderators are two-bit tyrants who take themselves way too serious. The guys here are steep in 'fighting' and don't mind if things get a little rough.

I personally lasted two days on a history forum before being threatened with being banned. I wasn't allowed to make any historical comparisons to current politics. The moderators said it upset other posters.

I was literally not allowed to use the words Trump or *****.

[Willie Pep 229]

- - And so I await with baited breath...

What's the point you can't 'read good' anyway how could you possibly hope to keep up with such a superior intellect.

[P to the J]

That's because on most forums the moderators are two-bit tyrants who take themselves way too serious. The guys here are steep in 'fighting' and don't mind if things get a little rough.

I personally lasted two days on a history forum before being threatened with being banned. I wasn't allowed to make any historical comparisons to current politics. The moderators said it upset other posters.

I was literally not allowed to use the words Trump or *****.

‘History forum’? Where was that, then?

Where social media are concerned, the major shareholders are just trying to keep their platforms commercially valuable, not so much that they’re really serious about good manners.
Serious about making a **** load of money and sticking to the rules of ‘corporate niceness’ to that end, and that’s it.

Which reminds me, the no-swearing rule round here’s ******. Actual swear words are not offensive in any way. It’s just normal speech that middle class, religious people have traditionally been appalled by because it was the language of the so-called lower orders.

[Willie Pep 229]

‘History forum’? Where was that, then?

Where social media are concerned, the major shareholders are just trying to keep their platforms commercially valuable, not so much that they’re really serious about good manners.
Serious about making a **** load of money and sticking to the rules of ‘corporate niceness’ to that end, and that’s it.

Which reminds me, the no-swearing rule round here’s ******. Actual swear words are not offensive in any way. It’s just normal speech that middle class, religious people have traditionally been appalled by because it was the language of the so-called lower orders.

About two years ago. I have no clue where. Found it by searching 'history forums.' -- Watch out for a moderator named CareBear - a Calfornia chick who screams WOKE. IMHO.