Did Ray Robinson and his Managment avoid all these fighters?

[sonnyboyx2]

I respect Mike Casey...I will let your low IQ figure out the rest. What you doesn't matter...lots of miser have lots of gold...doesn't do them any good. Besides you haven't read what you should read.

you now respect Mike Casey yet in your previous post you claim him to be wrong and you to be right..its also not a case of lots of miser have lots of gold which doesn't do them any good, in my case it has done me lots of good and is and has been a very enjoyable hobby... you stick to your couple of books and youtube footage maybe it will build your IQ

[Greatest1942]

you now respect Mike Casey yet in your previous post you claim him to be wrong and you to be right..its also not a case of lots of miser have lots of gold which doesn't do them any good, in my case it has done me lots of good and is and has been a very enjoyable hobby... you stick to your couple of books and youtube footage maybe it will build your IQ

I don't beleive neither should you , that I have to take every word of Mike Casey as gospel. There is much I don't agree with him. That doesn't mean I don't respect him. he is a very good writer on boxing history. Read all his articles.

Never mind you can stick to his articles, I will stick to my other sources.
(books, newspapers etc)

[sonnyboyx2]

I don't beleive neither should you , that I have to take every word of Mike Casey as gospel. There is much I don't agree with him. That doesn't mean I don't respect him. he is a very good writer on boxing history. Read all his articles.

Never mind you can stick to his articles, I will stick to my other sources.
(books, newspapers etc)

Mike Casey is a trusted boxing historian yet you want me to rubbish what he say's and take the world of Harry Otty a young guy who has nowhere near the experience of Casey

[sonnyboyx2]

I don't beleive neither should you , that I have to take every word of Mike Casey as gospel. There is much I don't agree with him. That doesn't mean I don't respect him. he is a very good writer on boxing history. Read all his articles.

Never mind you can stick to his articles, I will stick to my other sources.
(books, newspapers etc)

you say your sources are books & newspapers etc yet not once in all your disagreements with me have you ever put up a link from a newspaper article or any other source of information, infact you have never ever supplied any links to back-up your feeble argument yet expect everyone to accept your word on all matters as being "Carved in Stone"

[JAB5239]

you say your sources are books & newspapers etc yet not once in all your disagreements with me have you ever put up a link from a newspaper article or any other source of information, infact you have never ever supplied any links to back-up your feeble argument yet expect everyone to accept your word on all matters as being "Carved in Stone"

Archie Moore claimed Burley was the best he ever fought. Thats pretty high praise.

[Greatest1942]

you say your sources are books & newspapers etc yet not once in all your disagreements with me have you ever put up a link from a newspaper article or any other source of information, infact you have never ever supplied any links to back-up your feeble argument yet expect everyone to accept your word on all matters as being "Carved in Stone"

In our disagreements about Sam Langford I did provide you with a host of information and quotes. You couldn't swallow it not my fault. As for as Burley, it is common knowledge.

And One more thing Otty never said Burley would beat Sugar easily or stuff like that. Where in the world you got that idea from? Otty is a great historian, his contributions to boxing are well known. Sorry about Mike Casey, he is good, but I can't take all his views. He says Jack Dempsey is the greatest I don't agree. Leave it its useless to argue with you Sonny. You are welcome your views,just don't try to barge into mine, as you know I have read more than u ever will.

Adieu

[sonnyboyx2]

In our disagreements about Sam Langford I did provide you with a host of information and quotes. You couldn't swallow it not my fault. As for as Burley, it is common knowledge.

And One more thing Otty never said Burley would beat Sugar easily or stuff like that. Where in the world you got that idea from? Otty is a great historian, his contributions to boxing are well known. Sorry about Mike Casey, he is good, but I can't take all his views. He says Jack Dempsey is the greatest I don't agree. Leave it its useless to argue with you Sonny. You are welcome your views,just don't try to barge into mine, as you know I have read more than u ever will.

Adieu

your joking.. i have read thousands and own thousands of books & magazines...

Greatest1942... how old are you?

[Greatest1942]

your joking.. i have read thousands and own thousands of books & magazines...

Greatest1942... how old are you?

A bit older than you...

[sonnyboyx2]

A bit older than you...

c`mon boy spit it out....i know what age group you are and i also know who your last alias was on this forum before your last ban... c`mon then lets here what age you are or have i hit the nail on the head

[Greatest1942]

c`mon boy spit it out....i know what age group you are and i also know who your last alias was on this forum before your last ban... c`mon then lets here what age you are or have i hit the nail on the head

You are a bit of a politician Sonny, your allegations of Aliases are annoying. Strange whenever you get owned you come up with these alias theory. Its speaks of a strange hyperbole in your mind. Never mind I am not obliged to give you any details about my personal life.
As for you if you are a hundred the only thing you have learnt is make false accusations and tell lies. This thread is not meant to be our battle ground, so lets leave it.as for I am concerned I don't care what you say...90% of what you say is bull**** anyways.