Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who do you rank as the higher jimmy young or Jimmy Ellis?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by LeTombeur View Post
    I won't question your scorecard, but while I have Young winning without any doubt, I had it closer, maybe 9-6 in favor of Young, maybe I gave some close rounds to Ali
    I watched that fight live and thought that Young was a clear winner. Most likely his negative style turned off the judges who were already swooning over Ali. When it was over I definitely thought Young was robbed.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by LeTombeur View Post
      so you deny video evidence in which a disappointed Young responds positively when the commentator asks him if he thinks he has won the fight ?

      and what about Norton's refusal to say who he thinks has won between Ali-Young ? when you don't openly deny the obvious and the evidence I provide, you dodge my arguments, hence you expose yourself as a biased fraud

      you don't back anything you have said with anything credible, all you do is back your ''opinions'' with your bias

      unbelievable denial, you're a revisionist joke, period

      please someone ban this fool
      period

      please someone ban this fool you say?... are you having a ****in laugh?
      so what you are now trying to imply is that whenever you are called into question the person should be banned from the forum is that correct?..... you are a clown who has never watched the fights you are making false statements about... Did Jimmy Young engage Ali in a fight, Did Jimmy Young land or throw punches to be seen as the winner like you claim, Did Young repeatedly hold his head outside of the ropes so as to prevent Ali engaging him in a fight....which is why the judges scored it by landslide victory to Ali.

      You also claimed i have an AGENDA but never told what the agenda is

      i am going to have some fun with you in the coming weeks

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
        period

        please someone ban this fool you say?... are you having a ****in laugh?
        so what you are now trying to imply is that whenever you are called into question the person should be banned from the forum is that correct?..... you are a clown who has never watched the fights you are making false statements about... Did Jimmy Young engage Ali in a fight, Did Jimmy Young land or throw punches to be seen as the winner like you claim, Did Young repeatedly hold his head outside of the ropes so as to prevent Ali engaging him in a fight....which is why the judges scored it by landslide victory to Ali.

        You also claimed i have an AGENDA but never told what the agenda is

        i am going to have some fun with you in the coming weeks
        you should be banned for denying/ignoring the arguments backed up with evidence I have provided and for being a very biased poster

        you don't seem to realize 3 people in this thread alone say Young was robbed, but again, you ignore the fact that you're alone here thinking Ali won

        the judges scored the fight for the bigger name ($), not for the winner, and yes, Young did more than enough to win

        here, a sloppy Ali gets easily countered by Young



        as for your agenda, it is very simple : you defend the fighters you like, most of which are fighters of the past, and you distort the facts and the truth to nuthug them as much as you can

        your agenda is obvious in every thread you start

        I doubt you will have that much fun with me in the coming weeks if your arguments and opinions are always as poor as the ones I've read and destroyed here is this thread, in fact I could be the one having fun, but seriously, I don't find it all that fun to expose the bias of a mediocre poster such as you

        there is also a high possibility that I put you on ignore because as we can see here, it is impossible to reason with you, you come back again and again with arguments I have already destroyed

        therefore, I consider that you're not worth wasting time on
        Last edited by Tiozzo; 10-13-2010, 10:55 AM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
          I watched that fight live and thought that Young was a clear winner. Most likely his negative style turned off the judges who were already swooning over Ali. When it was over I definitely thought Young was robbed.
          definitely, but what some people like Sonnyboy don't realize is that a good, neutral judge won't give the fight to Ali because Young purposely sticks his head out of the ring if, for the rest of the contest, Ali is getting a whooping

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by LeTombeur View Post
            you should be banned for denying/ignoring the arguments backed up with evidence I have provided and for being a very biased poster

            you don't seem to realize 3 people in this thread alone say Young was robbed, but again, you ignore the fact that you're alone here thinking Ali won

            the judges scored the fight for the bigger name ($), not for the winner, and yes, Young did more than enough to win

            here, a sloppy Ali gets easily countered by Young



            as for your agenda, it is very simple : you defend the fighters you like, most of which are fighters of the past, and you distort the facts and the truth to nuthug them as much as you can

            your agenda is obvious in every thread you start

            I doubt you will have that much fun with me in the coming weeks if your arguments and opinions are always as poor as the ones I've read and destroyed here is this thread, in fact I could be the one having fun, but seriously, I don't find it all that fun to expose the bias of a mediocre poster such as you

            there is also a high possibility that I put you on ignore because as we can see here, it is impossible to reason with you, you come back again and again with arguments I have already destroyed

            therefore, I consider that you're not worth wasting time on
            Lets get it on ****sucker... ive forgot more about boxing than you will ever know, your a newbie to this sport and when you talk about boxing history its clear to me that you know nothing whatsoever about it, you have gone to the effort of putting up a clip of Jimmy Young throwing a slow right hand over Muhammad Ali's jab which you will use to back up your pathetic argument that Young beat Ali, ive seen that fight a couple of times and Young was beaten easily just like the judges marked it yet you claim they scored the fight for Ali coz he was the bigger name... talk about a laughable comment, why did the judges not score Ali the winner against Frazier (1) & Norton (1) both was close fights.. you live in a dream world mate... And i dont give a **** about how many posters think Young won against Ali as it is my opinion and the opinion of the judges that Ali was the clear winner... put up your scorecard of the fight and i will watch it again this evening laughing throughout at your lack of knowledge of the fight game.

            You claim i favor fighters from the past when the reality is that i talk about the fighters from the past because this is a boxing history section and the fighters from the past are vastly superior to any active fighters of the last 10yrs with the exception of Manny Pacquiao whom i rate as an ATG.. But the difference between myself and you is that i know what i am talking about when i talk about boxing from the past whereas you don't and if you think i am a mediocre poster then do yourself a favor and put me on your ignore list that way you wont have to read my posts

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by sonnyboyx2 View Post
              Lets get it on ****sucker... ive forgot more about boxing than you will ever know, your a newbie to this sport and when you talk about boxing history its clear to me that you know nothing whatsoever about it, you have gone to the effort of putting up a clip of Jimmy Young throwing a slow right hand over Muhammad Ali's jab which you will use to back up your pathetic argument that Young beat Ali, ive seen that fight a couple of times and Young was beaten easily just like the judges marked it yet you claim they scored the fight for Ali coz he was the bigger name... talk about a laughable comment, why did the judges not score Ali the winner against Frazier (1) & Norton (1) both was close fights.. you live in a dream world mate... And i dont give a **** about how many posters think Young won against Ali as it is my opinion and the opinion of the judges that Ali was the clear winner... put up your scorecard of the fight and i will watch it again this evening laughing throughout at your lack of knowledge of the fight game.

              You claim i favor fighters from the past when the reality is that i talk about the fighters from the past because this is a boxing history section and the fighters from the past are vastly superior to any active fighters of the last 10yrs with the exception of Manny Pacquiao whom i rate as an ATG.. But the difference between myself and you is that i know what i am talking about when i talk about boxing from the past whereas you don't and if you think i am a mediocre poster then do yourself a favor and put me on your ignore list that way you wont have to read my posts
              ****ty song, but the lyrics are perfect

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by LeTombeur View Post
                definitely, but what some people like Sonnyboy don't realize is that a good, neutral judge won't give the fight to Ali because Young purposely sticks his head out of the ring if, for the rest of the contest, Ali is getting a whooping

                As for the Young's head being out of the ring, a few years ago I asked a friend with a tape to count how many times it happened. He said about 12. My viewpoint is that it is the referee's job to warn Young if he was doing something illegal. He didn't so the judges should have scored the action (or lack thereof) in the ring. Same thing when Ali was allowed to flagrantly hold Frazier's head constantly during their second fight. The horrible ref did nothing about it, and the judges correctly gave Ali the decision since he basically rendered Frazier ineffective. The judges blew it in the Young fight though.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Scott9945 View Post
                  As for the Young's head being out of the ring, a few years ago I asked a friend with a tape to count how many times it happened. He said about 12. My viewpoint is that it is the referee's job to warn Young if he was doing something illegal. He didn't so the judges should have scored the action (or lack thereof) in the ring. Same thing when Ali was allowed to flagrantly hold Frazier's head constantly during their second fight. The horrible ref did nothing about it, and the judges correctly gave Ali the decision since he basically rendered Frazier ineffective. The judges blew it in the Young fight though.
                  I totally agree

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Joey Giardello View Post
                    I find both fighters hard to split
                    THAT'S EASY man........... It's JIMMY of course !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP