Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SBleeder's 100 All-time P4P List

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by SBleeder View Post
    Explain. Tell me which ones are in the wrong spots.
    Sergio Martinez?

    And the biggest joke of all, Lennox Lewis at 71 ahead of Spinks, Benitez, Holyfield?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by SBleeder View Post
      To recap my 51-100:

      51. Jose Napoles
      52. Maxie Rosenbloom
      53. Stanley Ketchel
      54. Jimmy Bivins
      55. Carmen Basilio
      56. Joe Frazier
      57. Chris John
      58. Fidel LaBarba
      59. Salvador Sanchez
      60. Jack Johnson
      61. Kid Gavilan
      62. Jersey Joe Walcott
      63. Bernard Hopkins
      64. Azumah Nelson
      65. Marcel Cedran
      66. Jung-Koo Chang
      67. Carlos Ortiz
      68. Kid Lewis
      69. Aaron Pryor
      70. Fighting Harada
      71. Lennox Lewis
      72. Michael Spinks
      73. Felix Trinidad
      74. Khaosai Galaxy
      75. Gene Fullmer
      76. Wilfredo Benitez
      77. Pancho Villa
      78. Jake LaMotta
      79. Evander Holyfield
      80. Ruben Olivares
      81. Harry Wills
      82. Terry McGovern
      83. Tommy Burns
      84. Mike Tyson
      85. Billy Conn
      86. Nigel Benn
      87. Pascual Perez
      88. Sergio Martinez
      89. Eusebio Pedroza
      90. Antonio Cervantes
      91. Marco Antonio Barrera
      92. Michael Carbajal
      93. Steve “Celtic Warrior” Collins
      94. Mike McCallum
      95. “Barbados Demon” Joe Walcott
      96. Ricky Hatton
      97. Bobo Olson
      98. Diego Corrales
      99. Oscar De la Hoya
      100. Manuel Ortiz


      Top 50 to come tomorrow.
      (1) Oscar Delahoya must be higher , the man held titles in 6 weight divisions , how many more examples for this do you have ? Felix Trinidad was a cheater , held titles in only 3 divisions , never really beat Delahoya , and yet you put him higher , Oscar must be ahead of Tito and Corrales for sure .
      (2) Tyson is too low in your list , couldn't find him a place at least in your top 30 ? the man was beating larger man on a regular basis .
      (3) Benn ahead of Collins ? Collins stopped him twice , Benn was also stopped by Watson whom was stopped by Eubanks and by Eubanks himself. Collins lasted the distance twice against Eubanks the records even say he outpointed him twice. Collins and Benn are the same age and Collins is older than Eubanks , he must be ahead of Benn.
      (4) I also believe Hopkins is too high , he is and was a mere foulist , never really obeyed the rules of boxing , and he beat either smaller men or a drained Tarver , this is all he ever done .

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by frankenfrank View Post
        (3) Benn ahead of Collins ? Collins stopped him twice , Benn was also stopped by Watson whom was stopped by Eubanks and by Eubanks himself. Collins lasted the distance twice against Eubanks the records even say he outpointed him twice. Collins and Benn are the same age and Collins is older than Eubanks , he must be ahead of Benn.
        Benn was practically a shot fighter after the McClellan fight, a fight in which he sustained a shadow on his brain. The shadow would further deteriote (due to Benn continuing to fight) into a brain legion by the time of the Collins fights. Which is the reason why Collins shouldn't get that much credit for beating him twice.

        As for Collins stopping Benn twice, both were by tko. The first fight ended because Benn sustained a ankle injury and couldn't fight, which is why a rematch was made. In that fight his team pulled him out because they felt he was no longer the fighter he used to be.

        Eubank was past prime at that point, but they are both still good wins for Collins

        The highlighted part I'm going to ignore
        Last edited by Toney616; 07-14-2010, 03:30 PM.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by SBleeder View Post
          This list was the product of hours of research and consideration as I was recuperating from back surgery. What follows is what I believe to be the top 100 pound-for-pound fighters of all time. It is, of course, my opinion only. At the very least, it should be a fun history thread for purposes of debate.

          100. Manuel Ortiz


          99. Oscar De La Hoya


          98. Diego Corrales


          97. Carl "Bobo" Olson
          what might your criteria be? i haven't even made it past 95 yet and i already see corrales and hatton ahead of de la hoya.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by CarlosG815 View Post
            Sergio Martinez?

            And the biggest joke of all, Lennox Lewis at 71 ahead of Spinks, Benitez, Holyfield?

            don't really see a problem with ranking lewis ahead of benitez. if the end of benitez's career wasn't riddled with losses, some to non-descript opponents, it might be a different story.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by SBleeder View Post
              Explain. Tell me which ones are in the wrong spots.
              What criteria are you using, to evaluate fighters?

              Comment


              • #27
                Of the 4 P4P lists that I've seen in the last week this is probably the best. I look forward to reading 1-50.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by considerthis View Post
                  what might your criteria be? i haven't even made it past 95 yet and i already see corrales and hatton ahead of de la hoya.
                  True , that's another knock , especially Diego MouthpieceSpitta HoBeata Corralles ahead of him , not that I agree Hatton should be higher than DLH.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by considerthis View Post
                    don't really see a problem with ranking lewis ahead of benitez. if the end of benitez's career wasn't riddled with losses, some to non-descript opponents, it might be a different story.
                    Originally posted by -IronMike- View Post
                    What criteria are you using, to evaluate fighters?
                    But hey , I bet yours would be worse.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by -IronMike- View Post
                      Benn was practically a shot fighter after the McClellan fight, a fight in which he sustained a shadow on his brain. The shadow would further deteriote (due to Benn continuing to fight) into a brain legion by the time of the Collins fights. Which is the reason why Collins shouldn't get that much credit for beating him twice.

                      As for Collins stopping Benn twice, both were by tko. The first fight ended because Benn sustained a ankle injury and couldn't fight, which is why a rematch was made. In that fight his team pulled him out because they felt he was no longer the fighter he used to be.

                      Eubank was past prime at that point, but they are both still good wins for Collins

                      The highlighted part I'm going to ignore
                      You can also ignore the fact Collins had brain damage too by that time , or do
                      you assume he had his brain damage after the Benn fights ?

                      And an ankle injury can be a result of a punch , you know ?

                      Both men , especially Eubanks were not more shot than Collins by the (respective) times they fought him. Remember Collins also fought Reggie Johnson , Mike McCallum and Sumbu Kalambay and Tony Thornton prior to facing them .

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP