Dwight Muhamed Qawi called Marvin Hagler out

[JAB5239]

so by your logic cause spinks wasnt able to ko a guy who has only been ko'd by holyfield and foreman,both of whom would ko hagler,it means you like marvins chances against spinks lol.riiight

Don't you think you're reaching by saying ANYBODY would ko Hagler? I mean its possible, but its an assumption that holds no water, thrown out there to support an opinion.

those fighters are past belt holders being that your trying so desperately to give hearns a noteworthy k.o other than duran above 147.i thought id pick some random champs to show idiotic your argument is.being a champ in the age of multiple belts doesnt mean crap as your always quick to point out.hearns kod nobody of note lol.even hearns said that cruiser belt is junk.give it up.

Shuler, Roldan, Maynard?

my replies get short cause this has gotten silly.and your really reaching for anything.mark medal a noteworthy fighter lol

He was a contender (i believe) who got ko'd by Tommy above 147, right?

im rambling on about mugabe cause you said the smaller fighters who fought hearns went on to beat bigger guys.mugabe is a smaller fighter who fought hearns. is he not?

Mugabi fought Hearns?

dont get me wrong,he's a great fighter,but his accomplishments at mw were nothing special so why should he be high on a lb for lb atg list?he ranks 3rd o my list cause i think he kicks the crap outta fictional characters like greb.no video means you dont crack my top 5

Lol, that is funny! They must suck if you never saw them. Comical.

ray robinson is #2 behind ali.2nd greatest boxer to ever lace em up.

Robinson beat better fighters than Ali and did it more decisively.

[r.burgundy]

so by your logic cause spinks wasnt able to ko a guy who has only been ko'd by holyfield and foreman,both of whom would ko hagler,it means you like marvins chances against spinks lol.riiight

At what point have I suggested Hagler would beat Spinks?

those fighters are past belt holders being that your trying so desperately to give hearns a noteworthy k.o other than duran above 147.i thought id pick some random champs to show idiotic your argument is.being a champ in the age of multiple belts doesnt mean crap as your always quick to point out.hearns kod nobody of note lol.even hearns said that cruiser belt is junk.give it up.

I'm quick to point out fighters who go cherry picking for multiple belts, but not so quick to discredit a fighter who has won and lost the same title while fighting the best in one division which means the guy whose name you struggle with, Dennis Andries, is imo someboby of note.. Duran is an ATG, where as, Medal, Schuler, Hutchins and Roldan are all fighters of note who were ko'd by Hearns above 147, which in turn ko's your whole argument..

my replies get short cause this has gotten silly.and your really reaching for anything.mark medal a noteworthy fighter lol

As i've just said, you don't have to be an ATG to achieve notability.. The fact that Medal was a heavy puncher who held an IBF belt at 154 puts him in the record books as a world class fighter.. Hutchins and Roldan are both noted as multiple world title challengers.. Jeff McCracken who i mentioned in an earlier post, is the one I shouldn't have mentioned, as he was just a very good club-fighter so you should have pulled me up when you had the chance..

im rambling on about mugabe cause you said the smaller fighters who fought hearns went on to beat bigger guys.mugabe is a smaller fighter who fought hearns. is he not?

There goes your credibility again.. It's difficult not to laugh, but if you had the slightest clue what you were on about, you'd be well aware that Mugabe and Hearns have never even been in the same ring together..

dont get me wrong,he's a great fighter,but his accomplishments at mw were nothing special so why should he be high on a lb for lb atg list?he ranks 3rd o my list cause i think he kicks the crap outta fictional characters like greb.no video means you dont crack my top 5

Moronic answer!... So Greb's in the Marvel comics is he?.. If your one of those who thinks he has to buy out the video store inorder to know about boxing, then I can see exactly where your coming from.. The only thing you've somehow got about right, is ranking Hagler no3 at MW..
Not at any point have I said that Hagler should be high on an ATG list, but I will dispute with anyone who says that he is not an ATG period.. Just for the record, i'd put him at around no28 on a P4P ATG list..

ray robinson is #2 behind ali.2nd greatest boxer to ever lace em up.

Where do you rank him at 160?

you suggested hagler would beat spinks by suggesting that hagler had the tools to make it a great fight because spinks couldnt ko qawi.

is demarcus corley somebody of note?what about cerifi who won a few belts?you know good and well winning a belt doesnt make you noteworthy,nor does constantly fighting for 1.keith holmes isnt a notable win on hopkins resume for a good reason.he had a belt but he wasnt very good.your entitled to your opinon but i strongly disagree.i feel the only note worthy fights hearns had at the higher weights were barkley,and hill

i clearly mixed up hearns name with haglers lol.nice try.this is about my 8th post and i mention several times about hagler and mugabe,so stop reaching.especially being that you still dint answer the ? of who did mugabe beat beat bigger than hagler

yes,greb is a fictional character.people believe in jesus and he has books about him also.that means everything he did was real also huh?like the great ali said"t.v is exposing these bums"

i rank ray rob as the best ww ever.if i ranked him as a mw i would put him #2 behind hopkins.i think he beats anybody hopkins fought but i cant see him beating the bernard that beat tito,plus sugar was abit past his best at mw.i would rank hagler atg status in the 30 range.i just dont think he should be higher than multi division champs

[r.burgundy]

Robinson beat better fighters than Ali and did it more decisively.

foreman trumps anybody on ray's resume

[JAB5239]

foreman trumps anybody on ray's resume

Lol, Foreman trumps Armstrong, huh?

[r.burgundy]

Lol, Foreman trumps Armstrong, huh?

uh yea lol.thats a fight ray rob is supposed to win and it was a freakish size mismatch and it was towards the end of homicide hanks career.

[JAB5239]

uh yea lol.thats a fight ray rob is supposed to win and it was a freakish size mismatch and it was towards the end of homicide hanks career.

Lol, Robinson had freakish size, but Hearns didn't? Lmao!!

Kid Gavilan is another fighter who ranks higher than George p4p.

I like how you change the parameters of your own post. First it was Foreman trumps anyone on Robby's resume. Now it comes down to when they fought. Whats next, George is better because he would have beaten any of Robinsons opponents?

[r.burgundy]

Lol, Robinson had freakish size, but Hearns didn't? Lmao!!

Kid Gavilan is another fighter who ranks higher than George p4p.

I like how you change the parameters of your own post. First it was Foreman trumps anyone on Robby's resume. Now it comes down to when they fought. Whats next, George is better because he would have beaten any of Robinsons opponents?

i didnt say robinson had freakish size lol.dude,seriously,your always in a such a rush to come at my posts that you just make yourself look ******.i said that fight was a freakish size mismatch being that ray was 5'11 and hank was 5'5 with short arms

[JAB5239]

i didnt say robinson had freakish size lol.dude,seriously,your always in a such a rush to come at my posts that you just make yourself look ******.i said that fight was a freakish size mismatch being that ray was 5'11 and hank was 5'5 with short arms

Im not the one who said Foreman was better than anyone on Robinsons resume.

[r.burgundy]

Im not the one who said Foreman was better than anyone on Robinsons resume.

dude just give up.foreman is better than anybody on ray's resume,especially the version of hank ray fought.and no kid gavilan aint better either being as how he's not better than armstrong.better size matchup and jab is about all he brought to the table against ray

[JAB5239]

dude just give up.foreman is better than anybody on ray's resume,especially the version of hank ray fought.and no kid gavilan aint better either being as how he's not better than armstrong.better size matchup and jab is about all he brought to the table against ray

Dude, believe what you want, but the facts speak for themselves. Foreman never beat a p4p fighter better than Gavilan or Armstrong. Make your own poll and we'll see. All my points say you're wrong and Im right. You game?