Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Pacquiao really a 7 weight champ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is Pacquiao really a 7 weight champ?

    Great fighter, but i've got him down for 5 bonafide titles, with an arguable 6th..

    He won the WBC flyweight title in 1998, the IBF super-bantamweight in 2001, the WBC super-featherweight title in 2008, and the WBC lightweight title shortly afterwards in 2008.. He also won the WBO welterweight title in 2009..

    He beat Hatton at light-welter, but that was for the IBO belt..
    In 2004, he fought Juan Manuel Marquez in a fight that was billed for both the IBF featherweight, and the WBA super-featherweight belts, but the fight ended a draw..

    I'd say his most dominant weight was super-bantam, where he stayed for nearly 4 years and Stopped Barrera, but I am i missing something with this
    7th weight?

  • #2
    he won the ring and lineal featherweight titles which you are forgetting

    light welter- he still wont a title at the end of the day so he did become the division champ. also he won the ring and linael light welter titles

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by lfc19titles View Post
      he won the ring and lineal featherweight titles which you are forgetting

      light welter- he still wont a title at the end of the day so he did become the division champ. also he won the ring and linael light welter titles
      you're not missing nothing son......Pac is a 5 division champ

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Rolling Stone View Post
        you're not missing nothing son......Pac is a 5 division champ
        you are a Hater... which is why you are starting these `Hate-Threads`in this section instead of going back to the NSB section where you get owned on a daily basis

        Comment


        • #5
          At face value, Ring belts are more meaningful than alphabet belts. I don't get how anybody would count say, Diaz at 135 for a WBC belt higher than MAB for a Ring belt at 126.

          But of course, the man makes the belt, not vice versa. Any title is only as worthy as the man who holds it.

          In any case, Pac is a 4 time world (lineal) champion, and overall he is indeed a 7 division titlist.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by MANGLER View Post
            At face value, Ring belts are more meaningful than alphabet belts. I don't get how anybody would count say, Diaz at 135 for a WBC belt higher than MAB for a Ring belt at 126.

            But of course, the man makes the belt, not vice versa. Any title is only as worthy as the man who holds it.

            In any case, Pac is a 4 time world (lineal) champion, and overall he is indeed a 7 division titlist.
            that's very clear 4 division lineal champion (record) and 7 division belthoder/titlist (record)...

            Comment


            • #7
              whilst the ring title is the best, it isnt a world championship. fact is that only the 4 main belts (wbo, wba, wbc and ibf) count towards calling yourself a champion of the wieght. so in other words, whilst we all knew hatton was the main man at 140, he didnt hold any of the major world titles. so pacquiao wasnt a world champion at 140 after beating hatton. IBO is only a minor title and not counted towards calling yourself a champion of the weight.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by shade darkar View Post
                whilst the ring title is the best, it isnt a world championship. fact is that only the 4 main belts (wbo, wba, wbc and ibf) count towards calling yourself a champion of the wieght. so in other words, whilst we all knew hatton was the main man at 140, he didnt hold any of the major world titles. so pacquiao wasnt a world champion at 140 after beating hatton. IBO is only a minor title and not counted towards calling yourself a champion of the weight.
                This is open to interpretation.

                But goin back to my other comment, do you feel that Pac beating David Diaz at 135 is a more authentic title victory than Pac beating Barrera at 126, simply because Diaz held a WBC belt while Marco only held a Ring belt?

                Comment


                • #9
                  yes he is a 7 weight champion also the only fighter in boxing history to be 4 division lineal champion

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by mickey malone View Post
                    Great fighter, but i've got him down for 5 bonafide titles, with an arguable 6th..

                    He won the WBC flyweight title in 1998, the IBF super-bantamweight in 2001, the WBC super-featherweight title in 2008, and the WBC lightweight title shortly afterwards in 2008.. He also won the WBO welterweight title in 2009..

                    He beat Hatton at light-welter, but that was for the IBO belt..
                    In 2004, he fought Juan Manuel Marquez in a fight that was billed for both the IBF featherweight, and the WBA super-featherweight belts, but the fight ended a draw..

                    I'd say his most dominant weight was super-bantam, where he stayed for nearly 4 years and Stopped Barrera, but I am i missing something with this
                    7th weight?
                    He stopped Barrera at featherweight for the lineal title, not at super bantamweight. And piss on the IBO, Hatton was the lineal champion at 140 when Pac beat him.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP