This ongoing feud between 2 of our posters....

[Coverdale]

Isn't Jab vs Queeny getting to be on the same level?(I like both posters) lol I mean really.

Queeny is on ignore.

[IronDanHamza]

The fact posters complain about this kind of shit just speaks for itself as to how pathetic some of the posters are on here.

Who cares? It's a forum. Let them bicker if that's what they want to do.

Bronson's one of the best posters on the site.

[max baer]

The fact posters complain about this kind of shit just speaks for itself as to how pathetic some of the posters are on here.

Who cares? It's a forum. Let them bicker if that's what they want to do.

Bronson's one of the best posters on the site.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYN41wGmP8U this is bronson dealing with aggro!

[solidman]

We are all boxing fans and that is the main thing. It is normal for some people to have arguments as long as it don't get too nasty.

[Willie Pep 229]

The fact posters complain about this kind of shit just speaks for itself as to how pathetic some of the posters are on here.

Who cares? It's a forum. Let them bicker if that's what they want to do.

Bronson's one of the best posters on the site.

If you happened to see my post above you know I agree with you 100%.

I think (my conjecture) this got out of hand when Bat and the cheif moderator were being assaulted with PMs, while the two guys were trying to get each other banned. I think Bat just got exhausted by it all.

Just my guess.

[MarbleFallsMauler]

These two smucks used to argue and insult each other incessantly on another boxing site. Vert tedious as they take over good threads.

[Coverdale]

The fact posters complain about this kind of shit just speaks for itself as to how pathetic some of the posters are on here.

Who cares? It's a forum. Let them bicker if that's what they want to do.

Bronson's one of the best posters on the site.

You enjoy having protracted arguments yourself though, so you have to allow for your personal bias in the situation.

In general you are correct though, I don't report people I just put them on ignore. I have managed to cull the main NSB May-Pac obsessives which should enhance the reading experience.

You have to allow for particular situations where two people's arguing is detrimental to others though. I can't help but feel it's performative/attention seeking a lot of the time because it could easily be taken to personal message out of view of others.

[QueensburyRules]

Queeny is on ignore.

- - Ignore for Ignorants...sweet!!!

[Marchegiano]

**** me, you guys. Jesus Christ. Poet over here claiming some kind virtue lost Woe is me baby bull**** from the principles


How about the **** who openly admits their motivations are not historical accuracy stops getting his **** licked solely because the propaganda posted agrees with your own opinion?



How about a crew whose reaction to no uncertain terms toward intellectual dishonesty is distrust?



Is the problem Z? Z and I hardly have extra rows beyond the normal. Z and I throw barn burners how often? Oh. I see. Z gets it about as often as any ****ing one of you AND that infraction will be left in that thread. Z is perfectly capable of calling me a dumb **** in one thread then laughing and agreeing some other jabroni is a dumb **** in another.

Can Bronson? Has he got it in him? Will Bronson be a butthurt **** over taking an ass whooping on basic human physiology and use that as motivation to detract from well researched history



Here's the goddamn truth. You lot are lazy ****s whose knowledge is given. As in you researched **** all nothing you talk about and are used to the safety of consensus. Must be true if everyone says it. Bronson posts support and source and you lose your ****. Do you check his source? **** no you don't. Know how I know? Because I've only read the ****ing thing and know for sure ****er is skipping around to form a narrative not found in the source!


You draw lines based on agreement and give praise to the man who best backs your predetermined opinion while doing your absolute best to ignore anything inconvenient to said narrative.



Best posters?

Nil is agam. Sullivan would do pretty well in the 1890-1910 period IMO. His opposition in the early years was weakish but he dominated. Jack Burke, who seems to be ignored by most, is a good indicator of his ability. Jack boxed on even terms with Slavin, Mitchel, Cleary, Kilrain and many more but was outclassed by Sullivan. People are citing Fitz, Sullivan was retired by the time Fitz arrived as a contender, Goddard, Slavin, Jackson only arrived on the scene by the time Sullivan was virtually retired, Gus Lambert got a mention, he would have one in a hundred chance of defeating John L, the Sullivan of 1881-85 was a serious heavyweight, fast, vicious, strong, big puncher, fit... after that, yeah drink etc but that early animal crushes the Ruhlin, Sharkey, Choynski, probably Maher, Corbett too and I suspect Fitz.

Okay, I'll go direct to the famed historian then.

What fights did John L fight strictly under LPR, QB, or a consistent mix of the two?


Just saying but he beat the names though doesn't change the fact his fights were made-to-order, rules that favor him.


Does an MMA record play in boxing? BKFC plays in boxing? Can I put together a record you will recognize because I beat the champions of the sports without ever participating in the sport?


You can act like this is a difficult to understand issue all you like. It isn't. I'm being very direct and writing in plain English. John L only ever lost when he fought QB. Simple. John L never beat anyone under LPR, simple. John L never beat anyone under QB, simple. John L's fights are a mix of rules tailored per fight. Simple.

Where are youse lost?

Oh but names and how impressively he won changes, effects, addresses any of that does it?


Love you bro, but that's a ****ty stepping to the side and talking about nonpoints response.

​


What happened? STFU and walk? Yup. The single most praised historian I give shine to? Yup. The man I say wrote the single best book in boxing history? Yup. Stepped right to the ****er didn't I? Response? Nope. I won't be given any kind of praise for having brought up a subject, stepped through the fire of nuh-huhs from the ignorant who didn't even bother to look, and found myself making my stance so clear to the authority who chose to speak on it he either stfu and walks or does something unheard of across 7 forums and corrects me.




Because that's what a hunt for truth looks like you dumb ***** bait **** bubbles. Your gay friendships just make you a bunch of ****** not anything like a good poster who knows TF they are talking about.






Just in case you're confused or want to act confused; Bronson is not a good poster. He is in fact a disruptive, childish, poster who is motivated to show lies are truths.







Are both of these kunts more than willing to cut up selections of sources to present an untrue historical record to a lazy fanbase unwilling to check for themselves and happy to repeat the garbage their grandfather's told them? **** yes they are!


Trav is a good poster. Shoulder is a good poster. Dempsey is a good poster. This new class, and the comforts the old heads find in it, are not worth a ****. If anything I've watched while Pep, Bill, and Willow, formerly great posters, slide into hogwash bull**** solely because now they can give their balls a tug and argue with me through their new butt boy. Like as if I an unaware of the proxy.


Neither ****ing one a good poster, but, Z's not a little ***** who has to start fifty threads all about the same GD thing to control a narrative. As in, his propaganda is limited to the subject and not about control Bronson enjoys manipulating you ****** ****s.





But, I call you ****** ****s and he kisses your ass doe





Advice? Point it TF out. Get into the debates and don't let me sit alone pointing out the lack of integrity while trying to control narrative across the entire forum.





Now that, that slut, has been called out properly let's see how quiet she remains.

[Biledriver]

**** me, you guys. Jesus Christ. Poet over here claiming some kind virtue lost Woe is me baby bull**** from the principles


How about the **** who openly admits their motivations are not historical accuracy stops getting his **** licked solely because the propaganda posted agrees with your own opinion?



How about a crew whose reaction to no uncertain terms toward intellectual dishonesty is distrust?



Is the problem Z? Z and I hardly have extra rows beyond the normal. Z and I throw barn burners how often? Oh. I see. Z gets it about as often as any ****ing one of you AND that infraction will be left in that thread. Z is perfectly capable of calling me a dumb **** in one thread then laughing and agreeing some other jabroni is a dumb **** in another.

Can Bronson? Has he got it in him? Will Bronson be a butthurt **** over taking an ass whooping on basic human physiology and use that as motivation to detract from well researched history



Here's the goddamn truth. You lot are lazy ****s whose knowledge is given. As in you researched **** all nothing you talk about and are used to the safety of consensus. Must be true if everyone says it. Bronson posts support and source and you lose your ****. Do you check his source? **** no you don't. Know how I know? Because I've only read the ****ing thing and know for sure ****er is skipping around to form a narrative not found in the source!


You draw lines based on agreement and give praise to the man who best backs your predetermined opinion while doing your absolute best to ignore anything inconvenient to said narrative.



Best posters?





â


What happened? STFU and walk? Yup. The single most praised historian I give shine to? Yup. The man I say wrote the single best book in boxing history? Yup. Stepped right to the ****er didn't I? Response? Nope. I won't be given any kind of praise for having brought up a subject, stepped through the fire of nuh-huhs from the ignorant who didn't even bother to look, and found myself making my stance so clear to the authority who chose to speak on it he either stfu and walks or does something unheard of across 7 forums and corrects me.




Because that's what a hunt for truth looks like you dumb ***** bait **** bubbles. Your gay friendships just make you a bunch of ****** not anything like a good poster who knows TF they are talking about.






Just in case you're confused or want to act confused; Bronson is not a good poster. He is in fact a disruptive, childish, poster who is motivated to show lies are truths.







Are both of these kunts more than willing to cut up selections of sources to present an untrue historical record to a lazy fanbase unwilling to check for themselves and happy to repeat the garbage their grandfather's told them? **** yes they are!


Trav is a good poster. Shoulder is a good poster. Dempsey is a good poster. This new class, and the comforts the old heads find in it, are not worth a ****. If anything I've watched while Pep, Bill, and Willow, formerly great posters, slide into hogwash bull**** solely because now they can give their balls a tug and argue with me through their new butt boy. Like as if I an unaware of the proxy.


Neither ****ing one a good poster, but, Z's not a little ***** who has to start fifty threads all about the same GD thing to control a narrative. As in, his propaganda is limited to the subject and not about control Bronson enjoys manipulating you ****** ****s.





But, I call you ****** ****s and he kisses your ass doe





Advice? Point it TF out. Get into the debates and don't let me sit alone pointing out the lack of integrity while trying to control narrative across the entire forum.





Now that, that slut, has been called out properly let's see how quiet she remains.

Hey now, I stayed out of your and Bronson's e-beef: Don't sh it on me for not taking sides. We've had a good rapport for a long time so it's kind of mind blowing you're taking shots at me now. But, whatever. I have neither the time nor energy for that ish and I'm not going to square off with you: I'll save my energy for someone I can generate some real disdain for. Have a nice day!