This ongoing feud between 2 of our posters....

[GhostofJuliusStreicher]

Fair enough, if that fart flower Bronson wants to reveal all his alts I’ll post mine. Don’t count on it though, he will deny having alts even though his Ivich and Bronson accounts ran parallel. I can hook with the best of them so if he wants to tussle back and forth I’m not going anywhere. To think a veteran member defended him and insisted he had no alts when he was Ivich, and then along came Bronson and more.

.....

[Coverdale]

Would not your words mean more if you said who you are (were)?

Each of these men share the characteristics of a severe lack of self-awareness, borderline hysteria over their long running feuds and large but fragile egos.

Part of the reason I enjoy derailing their repetitive and superficial bickering into introspection is that it quickly reveals their limitations. The arguments themselves are asinine but the psychological cause of them is fascinating to me. I've been observing this behaviour on the English speaking internet for more than two decades now.

[Mr Mitts]

Their can be little doubt of Coverdale's motives in reincarnating this contentious thread. He has been a troublemaker from day one. His main purpose apparently in joining the forum was to suggest who should be banned. His first post that I know of, does just that.

I am not surprised however, given that me software confirmed my suspicions months ago that he represented someone I already knew. He wants to be a good boy, but finds that very difficult to stick with.

[Coverdale]

Their can be little doubt of Coverdale's motives in reincarnating this contentious thread. He has been a troublemaker from day one. His main purpose apparently in joining the forum was to suggest who should be banned. His first post that I know of, does just that.

I am not surprised however, given that me software confirmed my suspicions months ago that he represented someone I already knew. He wants to be a good boy, but finds that very difficult to stick with.

You're gravely mistaken but your insistence is also of interest to me. Do you have much insight into why you do this?

If I was a troublemaker I would have written the response I had mentally constructed to your thread here. I didn't because I knew you would interpret it as unkindness and get on the defensive, thus furthering your animosity towards me.

I am genuinely interested why male dominated online spaces invariably descend into farce, irrespective of the subject matter. I would much prefer to discuss Bivol's supreme boxing talent (for example) but it's virtually impossible here, due to the amount of misplaced anger, cynicism and conspiracism.

[Mr Mitts]

You're gravely mistaken but your insistence is also of interest to me. Do you have much insight into why you do this?

If I was a troublemaker I would have written the response I had mentally constructed to your thread here. I didn't because I knew you would interpret it as unkindness and get on the defensive, thus furthering your animosity towards me.

I am genuinely interested why male dominated online spaces invariably descend into farce, irrespective of the subject matter. I would much prefer to discuss Bivol's supreme boxing talent (for example) but it's virtually impossible here, due to the amount of misplaced anger, cynicism and conspiracism.

You are obviously way more familiar with male dominated online spaces than me. You cruise them. What are you hoping to find?

[Coverdale]

You are obviously way more familiar with male dominated online spaces than me. You cruise them. What are you hoping to find?

You've made this boring insinuation before. Can you not be a little more imaginative?

[Mr Mitts]

You've made this boring insinuation before. Can you not be a little more imaginative?

By choosing to keep responding you are "going Bronson" on me, son

[Coverdale]

By choosing to keep responding you are "going Bronson" on me, son

Last time, you're now also on ignore. Goodbye.