Originally posted by Willie Pep 229
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dempsey V Marciano's Challengers?
Collapse
-
Bronson66
Willie Pep 229 like this.
- Likes 2
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
First off I'd like to say this is a well thought out and sensible post. I just can't see how Greb want a big enough name when he was beating the men Dempsey fought before Jack did. Maybe my view is hindsight, and maybe I do get caught up in the "fairness" thing. But for the life of me I'll never understand it.
It is easy to get angry at prize fighting.
They give so much in body and soul only to be denied or cheated by monied interests.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dr Z View Post
Well let's examine who they fought in title defense first. For the purpose of the tread only wins will be discussed, but the ages, activity levels and performances of the winner are key.
First up JD opponets..
Title defense wins over.
1. Miske who was dying of bright's disease. It was really a no decision fight. " During the fight, I began to feel that Billy wasn't giving me as tough a battle as I had expected. He did not seem like his old self.'" - Jack Dempsey. So he beat a dying man.
2. Brennan. Brennan was a good challager in fine working condition, but he had Dempsey hurt and JD had to come back to win in 12. There is some controversy as Brennan may have beaten the count. This one is one film to see.
3. Carpentier, The 172 pound challenger injured his hand and quickly faded Ko'd in four, but the Frenchman was doing well pre-injury. On film to see.
4. Gibbons. Shelby’s residents walked away disappointed and angry. Dempsey lacked his usual sharpness and power while Gibbons, who managed to cut Dempsey’s eye in round two, slapped on repeated clinches and generally tried to neutralize the champion.
After 15 nondescript rounds, referee Jim Dougherty – who was handpicked by Kearns – raised Dempsey’s hand with no argument from Gibbons. Because Kearns had dibs on the first $300,000 of income – and because only $72,000 of the third installment was paid to Team Dempsey – Gibbons ended up fighting for free. A lackluster affair and one that was poorly filmed by the statadard of the time.
5. Fripo. Demsey was down twice and hurt. Luckily he had the defensively inpet Fripo
After the fight Dempsey said "He is game and the hardest puncher I ever faced. It was the first time I was knocked down since I became champion and I'll never forget it. I saw eight million stars when I got that punch on the chin that knocked me out of the ring. ... I didn't even know he had knocked me out of the ring until I came to on my stool between rounds. I thought I had been knocked out."
And there is controversy of course as there is in many if Dempey fights.
It was a violation of the Rules of Boxing for the newspapermen to push Dempsey back into the ring. The rules state: "If a boxer is knocked out of the ring, he gets a count of 20 to get back in and on his feet. He cannot be assisted." Some people question to this day whether Dempsey would have been able to “beat the count” if not for this push back into the ring. In addition, the film is edited and JD may have been out of the ring for more than 20 seconds. And Dempsey did not obeythe rules.
Dempsey stood directly over Fripo in violation of the rules while Referee Gallagher began the count. Firpo attempted to rise and Dempsey lunged right at him, the blow grazing Firpo’s head just as he was getting off the canvas. The referee overlooked this unintentional violation of the rules.
At the very least Fripo deserved a re-match. That did not happen. Long Island City promoter Simon Flaherty offered Dempsey a huge purse to defend the title against African-American contender Harry Wills at the event. That did not happen either.
That is a wrap on Dempsey's successful title defenses.
He beat a dying man, beat the shimpy Carpentier who injured his hand, won a hard fought battle vs. Brennan and had to come back to stop him, won a lackluster fight over Gibbons, and beat Fripo with fouls and aid from the crowd.
His best opponents in Wills and Greb were avoided. Somehow I think Marciano's title opponets were a bit better.
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View Post
There was no coast to coast rioting. There was White on Black violence, mostly in the South and West.
Whites tried to shut down the film presentations and silence the celebration.
"Riots" was a White euphemism; same BS, as T-rump trying to claim there is violence on both sides.
Nah! Those were not riots. You read about the violence in detail and what you find is Whites attacking Blacks and movie theaters being set on fire. All one side.
The Blacks just wanted to dance in the street. Whites weren't having it.
Had the boy been mature, they'd have beat him up. But since he was a boy servicing their community, they let him go.
I've always read coast to coast rioting, but the news biz was, is, and forever shall be dubious much of the time with rare exception.Willie Pep 229 likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by JAB5239 View Post
First off I'd like to say this is a well thought out and sensible post. I just can't see how Greb want a big enough name when he was beating the men Dempsey fought before Jack did. Maybe my view is hindsight, and maybe I do get caught up in the "fairness" thing. But for the life of me I'll never understand it.
Comment
Comment