I just read the poster responding to. If you read a carefully? Surprise it makes no sense. It's like a double negative canceling out. Behaviors not found here versus behaviors otherwise.... otherwise found? No... Otherwise not found?
- - Leo was an exceptional cheat who cheated his own teammates.
The art of cheating is not being caught, and Leo was caught out many x, and like most cheats had very few redeeming qualities save mentoring the struggling rookie Mays who benefitted hugely by Leo's centerfield telescope.
You and Leo would make a great pair of buddies for sure.
Your lack of knowledge is "otherwise not found" in your posts? . You want to explain how this statement works?
Comment