Name me a fight where the fighter literally took the soul away from his opponent

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JAB5239
    Dallas Cowboys
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 27713
    • 5,034
    • 4,436
    • 73,018

    #51
    Originally posted by QueensburyRules

    - - Lewie ran away wif he tail between his legs wif U hanging on like a dingle...
    Ok let's say that's true. He won though. By your reasoning Vits ran from Byrd with his tail between his legs, and he lost. Why is this acceptable to you, but not Lewis winning and retiring?

    Comment

    • The plunger man
      the minge monster
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2014
      • 9139
      • 1,021
      • 263
      • 67,551

      #52
      Originally posted by QueensburyRules

      - - Spence's tumble with his wrecked Ferrari is what nixed Spence. While predictable to anyone cognizant of 101 physiology and psychology, we can also clearly see the evidence where he was off balance and very tentative against a light swatting journeyman stinker Ugas. Craw was his cash in fight...DUH!!!

      It's like U was born yesterday for the umpteenth time today.
      with your logic if vitali took Lewis’s soul then you can double it with Crawford taking bubba shrimp spence’s soul…but quess what weirdo lewis stopped klitchcko with only 6 rounds gone.
      Be quiet oddjob

      Comment

      • JAB5239
        Dallas Cowboys
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2007
        • 27713
        • 5,034
        • 4,436
        • 73,018

        #53
        Originally posted by QueensburyRules

        - - Spence's tumble with his wrecked Ferrari is what nixed Spence. While predictable to anyone cognizant of 101 physiology and psychology, we can also clearly see the evidence where he was off balance and very tentative against a light swatting journeyman stinker Ugas. Craw was his cash in fight...DUH!!!

        It's like U was born yesterday for the umpteenth time today.
        I thought Spence would be to big and beat Crawford. But the fact is any excuse you come up with is only the fault of Spence. He certainly hadn't been very active in 3 years....his own doing, but using an accident the happened nearly 3 years before is kind of ridiculous. Maybe Spence wasn't at his best, but I'd attribute that to inactivity. The fact the Crawford fought a brilliant fight is definitely another reason. Why can't you just give credit where it's due?

        Comment

        • QueensburyRules
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2018
          • 21793
          • 2,348
          • 17
          • 187,708

          #54
          Originally posted by JAB5239

          I thought Spence would be to big and beat Crawford. But the fact is any excuse you come up with is only the fault of Spence. He certainly hadn't been very active in 3 years....his own doing, but using an accident the happened nearly 3 years before is kind of ridiculous. Maybe Spence wasn't at his best, but I'd attribute that to inactivity. The fact the Crawford fought a brilliant fight is definitely another reason. Why can't you just give credit where it's due?
          - - Already indicated it’d be a Craw walkover…duh…

          Comment

          • JAB5239
            Dallas Cowboys
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 27713
            • 5,034
            • 4,436
            • 73,018

            #55
            Originally posted by QueensburyRules

            - - Already indicated it’d be a Craw walkover…duh…
            Because he was the better fighter.

            Comment

            Working...
            TOP