Im Getting Pig Sick Of Arseholes Derailing My Threads with Agenda Driven BS

[travestyny]

I don't cherry pick and Travestny and I profoundly disagree about Dempsey . He feels the same way about Dempsey as you and Z feel about Johnson,but at least he provides primary sources to back his opinion!

Thank you for this. However, I don't agree that I feel the same way about Dempsey as Z and GhostofDummy feel about Johnson. They blatantly lie about him. As you said, I provide primary sources for everything I say about Dempsey to back up my stance.

By the way, did you want to see the source about the ref admitting that Dempsey hit Sharkey low? I can probably find it if I look hard enough. It's not hate. It's simple facts. If it were hate, I would have rode with Z right away when he claimed Dempsey ducked Greb. I only conceded that he had a point after he provided a fair argument about it

[Dr. Z]

Trying to stimulate discussion and rekindle some interest in what is starting to be an apathetic Forum is becoming a thankless task.I made a thread about Joe Jeannette and what would have happened if he had beaten Johnson in1912?

Dr Z jumps on it like a dog with a bone and commences to turn it into a hate fest against Johnson when the thread is about Jeannette! I'm heartily sick of this lunatic he is banned for life for just this sort of behaviour on another forum.

WTF is the point of making an effort when you have moronic haters like him waiting to turn threads into agenda driven sewage?

You sad old man, stop lying and obsessing over me. I bring forth information for the readers, most recently in the Jeannette thread. His words on Johnson. Did you read them? I was not banned for life regardless of what you say. You have been banned from another forum and had multiple poster names, that is a fact.

You refuse to accept facts, play double standards, prop up guys while ignoring their faults ad nauseam,, and fit the term YSAB. Now if you keep up your jihad against me, and I will report you. To make threads about other poster is weak and unaccpetbale. Go it?

You got one thing right, you are pig sick. Now as I said before, be gone. Or at least try the ignore featue.

[them_apples]

Trying to stimulate discussion and rekindle some interest in what is starting to be an apathetic Forum is becoming a thankless task.I made a thread about Joe Jeannette and what would have happened if he had beaten Johnson in1912?

Dr Z jumps on it like a dog with a bone and commences to turn it into a hate fest against Johnson when the thread is about Jeannette! I'm heartily sick of this lunatic he is banned for life for just this sort of behaviour on another forum.

WTF is the point of making an effort when you have moronic haters like him waiting to turn threads into agenda driven sewage?

Yeah he needs to learn a lot. Only reason he doesn’t come at me is because I made a thread about Vitali being really good one time.

[Ivich]

Yeah he needs to learn a lot. Only reason he doesnât come at me is because I made a thread about Vitali being really good one time.

That'll do it! LOL

[Ivich]

You sad old man, stop lying and obsessing over me. I bring forth information for the readers, most recently in the Jeannette thread. His words on Johnson. Did you read them? I was not banned for life regardless of what you say. You have been banned from another forum and had multiple poster names, that is a fact.

You refuse to accept facts, play double standards, prop up guys while ignoring their faults ad nauseam,, and fit the term YSAB. Now if you keep up your jihad against me, and I will report you. To make threads about other poster is weak and unaccpetbale. Go it?

You got one thing right, you are pig sick. Now as I said before, be gone. Or at least try the ignore featue.

Translation required for below
Nauseam.Unaccpetbale Go it. Featue.


Still denying you are banned for life? " I place no blame on Jack for our fight not happening" Joe Jeannette September 1912.
Old Friends?
"Jim Jeffries will beat Johnson easily" Jeannette
"I weighed but 165lbs for our last contest" Jeannette
I have already whipped Johnson easily three times and will do so again when I get the chance." Jeannette
My thread was entitled ARSEHOLES if you identify with that ,its your problem! lol

[BattlingNelson]

But it does not prevent your thread from being derailed by some arsehole.

Correct but you wont see the derailment thereby your enjoyment of reading your thread gets better.

[Ivich]

Correct but you wont see the derailment thereby your enjoyment of reading your thread gets better.

Are my threads being derailed ? Answer yes.
Will they continue to be ? Answer yes.
Will I continue to make threads? Answer no.

[BattlingNelson]

Are my threads being derailed ? Answer yes.
Will they continue to be ? Answer yes.
Will I continue to make threads? Answer no.

It's your call. It's not like you don't take part in the mudslinging though.

[Ivich]

It's your call. It's not like you don't take part in the mudslinging though.

I don't derail threads with a hate agenda.

[BattlingNelson]

I don't derail threads with a hate agenda.

Maybe not, but you keep fueling the feud instead of taking the high road. I honestly cannot say who of you has started. It's like the hen or the chicken or Israel and the ************.

I acknowledge and agree that it would be nice to return to the old forum feature where a poster on ignore couldn't post in a thread made by the one having him on ignore.