I often see certain fighters legacy take a hit because of their lack of punching power or low knockout ratio. Some lacked the big punching power, others were plagued with brittle hands that injured easily. Do you fighters such as Loughran, Rosenbloom, Maxim, Locche, Malignaggi, Bradley get knocked down a few points on the greatness scale for lack of a big punch?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Do you count punching power as a criteria for greatness?
Collapse
-
Tags: None
-
Yes of course they do.
Back to my same old same old argument . . .
You've got to entertain or people won't watch.
We had one of the greatest ATGs ever in Mayweather Jr. yet the fight game lost ground instead of becoming more popular. Why was that? Because Money for the casual fan was boring to watch.
No ****, no **** for your buck -- celebrities walked out on the boy because he wouldn't fight just box.
The NBA secretly/quietly added a half step to the traveling rule just so slam-dunks would be more excitng.
You got to entertain to be great. I didn't make the rule but it's always been a rule. Boxers don't get an exception.Rockin' likes this.
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostYes of course they do.
Back to my same old same old argument . . .
You've got to entertain or people won't watch.
We had one of the greatest ATGs ever in Mayweather Jr. yet the fight game lost ground instead of becoming more popular. Why was that? Because Money for the casual fan was boring to watch.
No ****, no **** for your buck -- celebrities walked out on the boy because he wouldn't fight just box.
The NBA secretly/quietly added a half step to the traveling rule just so slam-dunks would be more excitng.
You got to entertain to be great. I didn't make the rule but it's always been a rule. Boxers don't get an exception.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Willie Pep 229 View PostYes of course they do.
Back to my same old same old argument . . .
You've got to entertain or people won't watch.
We had one of the greatest ATGs ever in Mayweather Jr. yet the fight game lost ground instead of becoming more popular. Why was that? Because Money for the casual fan was boring to watch.
No ****, no **** for your buck -- celebrities walked out on the boy because he wouldn't fight just box.
The NBA secretly/quietly added a half step to the traveling rule just so slam-dunks would be more excitng.
You got to entertain to be great. I didn't make the rule but it's always been a rule. Boxers don't get an exception.
Maybe Rigondeaux? But actually he did have excellent power now that I remember.Last edited by travestyny; 08-07-2023, 12:07 PM.
Comment
-
I think it affects the gate more than the legacy. Fighters like Pep and Loughran still retain a high ranking in knowledgeable circles. But the big punch is probably more memorable and exciting than anything in boxing. It might extend the legacy a little longer in time, when a man is a legendary puncher. I mean, Jimmy Wilde must be the most well remembered fighter of his weight ever. Even a master boxer with a light punch can be popular, if he punches enough along with his defensive displays. That is why Pep is legendary and Locce is not. Both were peerless pure boxers, but of the two, only Pep punched enough.GhostofDempsey likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostI often see certain fighters legacy take a hit because of their lack of punching power or low knockout ratio. Some lacked the big punching power, others were plagued with brittle hands that injured easily. Do you fighters such as Loughran, Rosenbloom, Maxim, Locche, Malignaggi, Bradley get knocked down a few points on the greatness scale for lack of a big punch?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ivich View Post
That would depend on whom they knocked out with it.Curtess Shepard and Bob Satterfield were two of the most devastating punchers of their eras,but neither would be called great fighters. I like Malignaggi,I saw him fight on the de La Cuz v Frampton bill,but even with a punch he would not be a great fighter.RESUME!Slugfester likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View PostI often see certain fighters legacy take a hit because of their lack of punching power or low knockout ratio. Some lacked the big punching power, others were plagued with brittle hands that injured easily. Do you fighters such as Loughran, Rosenbloom, Maxim, Locche, Malignaggi, Bradley get knocked down a few points on the greatness scale for lack of a big punch?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by travestyny View Post
I don't know if the fighter who made the most money in the sport is a great example to use here. Someone must have been watching. Actually, a lot of people.
Maybe Rigondeaux? But actually he did have excellent power now that I remember.
But his biggest paydays, the record setters, involved, Canleo, Pacquiao, Hatton, Juda. McGregor, Del La Hoya, Gatti.
All known as fighters who would press the action.
While each brought with them enough of their own fans to set (together) record breaking $ numbers.
But did they buy for him or them?
On the other hand every great fighter needs his 'Joe Fraziers.' It always takes two to make the big bucks.
Last edited by Willie Pep 229; 08-07-2023, 02:52 PM.GhostofDempsey
Rockin' like this.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment