i am not a boxer since being a kid so i cannot discuss too much about technique as some of you here will be able. i talk on what i know about the sport in terms of boxing's history and sociology.
the d3vil said in another thread about how brits and yanks predominate the history of boxing because they are western english speaking so easy to promote so a heck of a lot of our perceptions about rankings are based on how we perceive the opponents and the era.
someone earlier i think it were willow talked about how tough boxing was 60 odd years ago as men from all walks of life had little chance of wealth unless they became a classy boxer or athlete.
there were little else chances. so willie pep must have had some damn hard fights to be a key player during his era of hungry hungry men all desperate for that bit glory on offer.
the d3vil said in another thread about how brits and yanks predominate the history of boxing because they are western english speaking so easy to promote so a heck of a lot of our perceptions about rankings are based on how we perceive the opponents and the era.
someone earlier i think it were willow talked about how tough boxing was 60 odd years ago as men from all walks of life had little chance of wealth unless they became a classy boxer or athlete.
there were little else chances. so willie pep must have had some damn hard fights to be a key player during his era of hungry hungry men all desperate for that bit glory on offer.
Comment