Originally posted by Dr. Z
View Post
I agree Dempsey's resume is shallow for a man who is consistently ranked top ten all time, quite often top five.
Jack Sharkey coming off wins over the black HWs Dempsey ducked certainly helps Dempsey's stance in that debate. Especially since a decade later Sharkman Jack would still be good enough to get title shots.
That said, Vitali's resume is pretty lacking. Soslowski and such rabble. I guess Nipple and Dereck, never wins any important fights but somehow is always ranked nicely Chisora are good enough wins given they're still viable contenders ... when they're active. I don't know why Nips put on such a match against Ruiz and then stopped fighting again. I thought he won that fight.
Between them I think Gibbons, Sharkey, and Gunboat are better wins than anything V's gotten.
But, I also think focus on wins and names doesn't really address hows. When you are absolutely destroying fodder while other guys struggle with them, you may not have a great resume but you still have a good argument for those who do. Vitali was always a good show, dominant, and even his loss against Lewis shows he was a great HW.
Comment