Michael Moorer dominates 6 ft 10 275 lb Mike White

[Ivich]

starting to name call, sign of a losing fighter lol

Im not name calling I'm giving my sincere opinion of your boxing knowledge.
You couldnt win a debate if you were arguing with yourself! lol

[Ivich]

- - Need to word it better.

Need to read it better.

[QueensburyRules]

Need to read it better.

- - Read it like U wrote it.

[Ivich]

- - Read it like U wrote it.

Nobody else was confused.now that's enough time spent on you.

[Nash out]

I do believe Valuev was 7-foot - unlike Andre The Giant, who was actually 6'10

I read somewhere that Andre was measured at 6 ft 11 and a half at the peak of his height. Listed at 7 ft 4 I think, though in wrestling, very common to exaggerate height. Kane and Undertaker were often called 7 ft monsters. I'm not sure what they were, maybe 6 ft 8? Nash out.

[Willow The Wisp]

I read somewhere that Andre was measured at 6 ft 11 and a half at the peak of his height. Listed at 7 ft 4 I think, though in wrestling, very common to exaggerate height. Kane and Undertaker were often called 7 ft monsters. I'm not sure what they were, maybe 6 ft 8? Nash out.

Big mother though.

[GhostofDempsey]

I literally put that in the title, obviously I can see that. I question the validity of the numbers though. Moorer seems so much smaller.

Either or, since weight is everything, he's got 50 lbs on him and still got washed, almost KOed.

So that at least gives 205 lb Louis a fighting chance, up to 255. Any heavier and no chance right?

Rocky could only beat someone 235-240 by this game.

THE FACT IS:

Moore was a former LHW
and he just beat the **** out of a 6 ft 10 275 lb heavyweight, and you are on here making threads about Joe Joyce (who's a total bum by the way, absolute bum). as a reminder Mike white is considerably bigger than Tyson Fury, because on top of his greater height, he's not nearly as fat and scales to 275 - more of his weight is muscle and bone. Fury if he was lean might only be 225-230 lbs, he's very slim.

So how is this a pointless thread? it's a perfect example and you just throw it in the trash like it means nothing. It's showing a much much smaller man beat a much larger man and shows it's possible, and not even difficult if the level gap is big.

Anyone who disagrees with him is accused of being a casual or starting a pointless thread. He loves to split hairs and never admits when he's wrong. The take-away here is that Moorer was in fact the much smaller man, but he was more skilled and that skill is what prevailed. Usyk just showed what a smaller, more skilled boxer can do to a much larger mediocre fighter...and he did it twice! It's not a rule without exceptions. Sometimes the smaller, more skilled fighter can't overcome the size disadvantages, but various factors come into play...prime of the fighter, wear and tear, if the bigger man is a clincher/runner, etc.

[markusmod]

I read somewhere that Andre was measured at 6 ft 11 and a half at the peak of his height. Listed at 7 ft 4 I think, though in wrestling, very common to exaggerate height. Kane and Undertaker were often called 7 ft monsters. I'm not sure what they were, maybe 6 ft 8? Nash out.

Andre wore lifts to give him a few inches

[Ivich]

Anyone who disagrees with him is accused of being a casual or starting a pointless thread. He loves to split hairs and never admits when he's wrong. The take-away here is that Moorer was in fact the much smaller man, but he was more skilled and that skill is what prevailed. Usyk just showed what a smaller, more skilled boxer can do to a much larger mediocre fighter...and he did it twice! It's not a rule without exceptions. Sometimes the smaller, more skilled fighter can't overcome the size disadvantages, but various factors come into play...prime of the fighter, wear and tear, if the bigger man is a clincher/runner, etc.

In your haste to stab me from the sidelines you totally missed it!

He said because Moorer beat White it proved that;

And this is his statement;
"A lhw can destroy a dude bigger than Fury if the lhw is more skillful"

And it proves nothing of the sort because at 225 lbs Moorer was a heavyweight ,had been one for 2 years and was having his
6th fight as one!
I've stated on here several times that a man 220lb can beat anyone regardless of size IF he is good enough.
I'll admit when I am wrong ,I did so on my own thread about Joe Louis' ranked challengers,admitted it .and thanked the poster for the correction.
.But so far neither Apples or you have proven me to be so!

[markusmod]

In your haste to stab me from the sidelines you totally missed it!

He said because Moorer beat White it proved that;

And this is his statement;
"A lhw can destroy a dude bigger than Fury if the lhw is more skillful"

And it proves nothing of the sort because at 225 lbs Moorer was a heavyweight ,had been one for 2 years and was having his
6th fight as one!
I've stated on here several times that a man 220lb can beat anyone regardless of size IF he is good enough.
I'll admit when I am wrong ,I did so on my own thread about Joe Louis' ranked challengers,admitted it .and thanked the poster for the correction.
.But so far neither Apples or you have proven me to be so!

Moorer's biggest problem was the chin. He was nearly killed by Tua