Michael Moorer dominates 6 ft 10 275 lb Mike White

[QueensburyRules]

no he was about 20 lbs thicker (fatter, lets use the right words) if we are simply going by size. he hit 230+ in his first run a few times. Its just chub of course, even at 250, I question if he was any bigger and not just fatter. Against Qawi he got down to 236 or something, and he looked smaller than his 70's days.

Not aimless at all Queensbot. just a different angle that you aren't used to. you can easily make connections if you use your brain a bit, I promise you the extra chub Foreman put on did not allow him to take out Moorer. He would have murdered Moorer in a few rounds in his first run.


Perhaps in this case, the 218 lb version of Joe Louis that fought Charles might have a fighting chance of taking out Deontay Wilder at 212 lbs! now we are getting somewhere!

- - George would murder Ali in his first run if he hadn't been deliberately cut that delayed the fight that killed George training, and then deliberately drugged by Sadler the first fight and given a quick count with no rematch.

The Moorer that fought George was infinitely bigger, stronger, and just as lefty as Mildy who gave Ali all kinds of trouble. He'd have easily KOed the Clay that fought Jones, then Cooper, then Liston when he tried to quit their first fight.

Maybe need a brainbot assistant for you...

[them_apples]

How may decisions did Bowe. Klitschko, Klitschko, and Lewis lose? Just one and it was razor thin out of how many fights? Needless to say Mike White does not rate with them at all or even tier two big guys. Not even tier three guys. He is 26-13 ( ko'd 6 times ) and drew once. That a journeyman. He was also old and past his best ( 35 ) for Moorer. In fact he lost his last two fights. Why do you list him again? Why?

Again why? I never listed him along anywhere. Hes a big ass dude getting schooled by a smaller dude. Many on this forum think because a fighter is so big that this is a deciding factor.

Bot sure about your points about those you listed, nothing special about them losing very few decisions. All depends on who they fought, when and also the fact that 2 of them got slept in their primes multiple times, Wlad never avenged his.

yes they are all “good fighters” but def not some category on their own called “superheavies” as if they would beat anyone else under 6 ft 5. Last year alone we saw some mediocre giants tumble.

[them_apples]

Bump cause people forgot

[them_apples]

He came on here with a very pompous tone and dismisses anyone who contradicts him or challenges him. Even when proven wrong he will either deflect or just go quiet. He is a knowledgeable poster but very defensive when you disagree with him. And yes, he is better than the trolls who are here just for their own amusement.

He is a good poster for the most part but you are right this guy will argue like that monty python scene where the dude gets all his limbs chopped off. I don’t understand how this isn’t a perfect example of what I am saying.

he says 220 is the magic number here, for one Moore probably isn’t that heavy and if he is its all food and water. But that being said, the size different is MASSIVE we don’t need numbers ffs!!!!

[QueensburyRules]

Again why? I never listed him along anywhere. Hes a big ass dude getting schooled by a smaller dude. Many on this forum think because a fighter is so big that this is a deciding factor.

Bot sure about your points about those you listed, nothing special about them losing very few decisions. All depends on who they fought, when and also the fact that 2 of them got slept in their primes multiple times, Wlad never avenged his.

yes they are all �good fighters� but def not some category on their own called �superheavies� as if they would beat anyone else under 6 ft 5. Last year alone we saw some mediocre giants tumble.

- - Size matters, the whole reason for weight classes.

Nobody but morons would ever say size is the only factor…duh…

[them_apples]

- - Size matters, the whole reason for weight classes.

Nobody but morons would ever say size is the only factor…duh…

there are a lot of Morons on this forum then. They explicitly say the reason Marciano or Louis can’t win is because they don’t weight enough.

[Ivich]

there are a lot of Morons on this forum then. They explicitly say the reason Marciano or Louis can�t win is because they don�t weight enough.

I say a man 200lbs plus can beat any man IF he is good enough. I stated that quite clearly putting caps in the important places
Why do you repeatedly misrepresent what I said?

I also said Marciano could beat much bigger third raters,and he did.
I never said Louis could not beat bigger men, we know he beat much larger ranked heavyweights

You are deliberately misrepresenting my opinion to try and prove your point.

Your post is dishonest and dissapointingly, so are you.

[Willie Pep 229]

As anyone noticed that both Fury and Usyk look like they're too old to still be prize fighting?

I look at their faces and think these are the two oldest looking HW Champions I have seen.

Fury has crows' feet around his eyes. Although white skin has never aged as well as people of color.

[them_apples]

As anyone noticed that both Fury and Usyk look like they're too old to still be prize fighting?

I look at their faces and think these are the two oldest looking HW Champions I have seen.

Fury has crows' feet around his eyes. Although white skin has never aged as well as people of color.

Fury was 6 ft 8 w a ******* habit and he’s obese. There is no way the guy is healthy. Being that big alone gives you health problems.

[Ivich]

Fury was 6 ft 8 w a ******* habit and he�s obese. There is no way the guy is healthy. Being that big alone gives you health problems.

He is healthy enough not to have ever lost a professional fight!