Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Carmen Basilio v Jose Napoles?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by Ivich View Post
    I think the beating that Paret got from Fullmer was responsible for his demise ,I've never been a fan of Ruby Goldstein as a referee.He stopped the SRR vTurpin fight a tad to early imo Turpin was slipping a lot of those shots.Ruby then went to the other extreme and allowed Griffith to tee off on Paret.Goldstein's handling of the Ingo v Floyd1st fight was farcical too and potentially very dangerous.Shall we say the TV era?
    with the way he carried on it even could have happened in camp. He didn't care about punishment at all, nobody even thought about brain damage really. they lived so fast.

    The reason he let it go is because paret had such a knack for coming back from punishment. Like gatti. He would look finished then come on strong the next round. its a slippery slope.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by them_apples View Post

      with the way he carried on it even could have happened in camp. He didn't care about punishment at all, nobody even thought about brain damage really. they lived so fast.

      The reason he let it go is because paret had such a knack for coming back from punishment. Like gatti. He would look finished then come on strong the next round. its a slippery slope.
      Fullmer thought he was responsible for Paret's death.
      I'm not a fan of Goldstein at all he was honest but inconsistent imo.

      Comment


      • #13
        I do think Turpin/Robinson II was stopped early. Like the man said, Turpin was slipping a lot of that wild barrage. If Robby had landed a couple more clean ones, then I could have said yes, stop it. He would have been tired after all that missing.

        * * * * *

        Napoles, Basilio?

        Napoles is the only one with much choice in how he fights. Onion man must do what he always does.

        Bring lots of towels and sponges for the blood. I thought about this match up before, and had nowhere to go. I don't like picking a winner when I am flipping a coin to get there. Being lost then, I will employ Bilbo's favorite theory, the mighty Triangular theory, with extension. If Carmen beat Robinson once, he will most likely beat Napoles twice.

        I didn't know if there was a deductive chain or not. Now we know, Carmen wins.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by The Old LefHook View Post
          I do think Turpin/Robinson II was stopped early. Like the man said, Turpin was slipping a lot of that wild barrage. If Robby had landed a couple more clean ones, then I could have said yes, stop it. He would have been tired after all that missing.

          * * * * *

          Napoles, Basilio?

          Napoles is the only one with much choice in how he fights. Onion man must do what he always does.

          Bring lots of towels and sponges for the blood. I thought about this match up before, and had nowhere to go. I don't like picking a winner when I am flipping a coin to get there. Being lost then, I will employ Bilbo's favorite theory, the mighty Triangular theory, with extension. If Carmen beat Robinson once, he will most likely beat Napoles twice.

          I didn't know if there was a deductive chain or not. Now we know, Carmen wins.
          Its a pickem fight imo.Napoles had the talent, Basilio the heart and desire.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by them_apples View Post

            Tough cause napoles is so skillful but had a drinking problem and not enough star competition. Napoles is superior in most ways except the most important one, heart and probably chin.

            Really tough call. Ill prob edge it to Basilio with the late round rally and the glimpses of Napoles fading late
            Its nothing to not understand you crazy idiot its video comparing how they fought from then and compare like it's a video comparing ali and louis era anybody with good vision can see Ali's era used more angles and were way smoother in their upper and lower body movement

            none of the other stuff you said matters cause they would have to have the advances before the other stuff comes into play so your slow ontop of being crazy

            You can come in a gym and say you wanna fight like a louis conn max or a Robinson/dempsey liston ali Frazier they wont teach you those old styles as they were you will be taught similar to those styles but way more advanced at it

            So if the people in gym see that that crap wouldn't work that means they know you could be injured fast trying to use it or die trying to use those outdated crap techniques with a way more advanced one you idiot

            causes if you crazies were right why is it its nobody who fought as stiff and simple as they did in the dempsey/conn era its nobody who made it to mid card let alone high level who fought like thats nobody ever since those era's that's not a coincidence you idiot so your trolling me does you no good but expose you like I always have even before I talked to you by talking to other crazy idiots like you

            So stop the bull you crazy person your the one who cant see and plays act like your blind and make a fighter fight different then he is on video your idiot

            You crazy people pick old fighters cause your crazy or have bad vision or acting like you have bad vision or its a combo of all

            none of the people you pick have any advances that can be shown on video its all made up in your mind i know its madeup cause I asked you crazy people since last year to prove me wrong by video you refuse to cause it doesn't exist

            And yea if you did talk to a coach which you didn't it would make sense him saying people would be scared to get hit figting like that as I explained anybody fighting with those trash outdated style would be injured or die using that with a more advanced fighter to many times but since you didn't cause he would tell you exactly what I told you in a nicer way your lies don't matter

            Or if you did talk to him you told him your a fan of those outdated era's so he told you some crap to not hurt your feelings

            Those people in louis/dempsey/ eras in-between would all be destroyed by any mid-high 70s-90s fighter they wouldnt even allow it to save the health of those fighters

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by moneytheman View Post

              Its nothing to not understand you crazy idiot its video comparing how they fought from then and compare like it's a video comparing ali and louis era anybody with good vision can see Ali's era used more angles and were way smoother in their upper and lower body movement

              none of the other stuff you said matters cause they would have to have the advances before the other stuff comes into play so your slow ontop of being crazy

              You can come in a gym and say you wanna fight like a louis conn max or a Robinson/dempsey liston ali Frazier they wont teach you those old styles as they were you will be taught similar to those styles but way more advanced at it

              So if the people in gym see that that crap wouldn't work that means they know you could be injured fast trying to use it or die trying to use those outdated crap techniques with a way more advanced one you idiot

              causes if you crazies were right why is it its nobody who fought as stiff and simple as they did in the dempsey/conn era its nobody who made it to mid card let alone high level who fought like thats nobody ever since those era's that's not a coincidence you idiot so your trolling me does you no good but expose you like I always have even before I talked to you by talking to other crazy idiots like you

              So stop the bull you crazy person your the one who cant see and plays act like your blind and make a fighter fight different then he is on video your idiot

              You crazy people pick old fighters cause your crazy or have bad vision or acting like you have bad vision or its a combo of all

              none of the people you pick have any advances that can be shown on video its all made up in your mind i know its madeup cause I asked you crazy people since last year to prove me wrong by video you refuse to cause it doesn't exist

              And yea if you did talk to a coach which you didn't it would make sense him saying people would be scared to get hit figting like that as I explained anybody fighting with those trash outdated style would be injured or die using that with a more advanced fighter to many times but since you didn't cause he would tell you exactly what I told you in a nicer way your lies don't matter

              Or if you did talk to him you told him your a fan of those outdated era's so he told you some crap to not hurt your feelings

              Those people in louis/dempsey/ eras in-between would all be destroyed by any mid-high 70s-90s fighter they wouldnt even allow it to save the health of those fighters
              "Outdated eras" - I'm not sure what it is, but there is something wrong with that phrase.

              RE Bold: Does "lower body" means legs? - As in 'footwork.'?

              Because outside of belly dancers I'm not sure any one can move their chest and gut in different directions. At least any fighter I've seen. Maybe that's the angles I'm not seeing.

              Conclusion: If you fight in the ring like Jack Dempsey, you'll die! --> Really?

              Comment


              • #17
                Tell me honestly, Mon, do you think a guy like Sugar Ray Robinson would stand much chance against a contemporary middleweight like, for instance, Jermall Charlo?

                Comment

                Working...
                X
                TOP