Why Didn't Lennox Lewis and old George Foreman Square Off?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Knighte
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 224
    • 14
    • 0
    • 6,388

    #1

    Why Didn't Lennox Lewis and old George Foreman Square Off?

    And what would've happened if they did?


    I see Lewis, who was lighter on his feet - and old enough to be George's son -outboxing the older, slower Foreman.. that is, when he wasn't hugging him or dancing around him. But I wonder if Lewis' thunderous rights would've so much as dented Foreman's chin? This has lopsided decision written all over it, if you ask me. In favor of Lennox, of course.

    I think this fight could theoretically have happened if Shannon Briggs wasn't awarded a gift decision over Foreman.. He went on to fight Lewis for the title and lost, although he gave a good accounting of himself
  • JAB5239
    Dallas Cowboys
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 27721
    • 5,036
    • 4,436
    • 73,018

    #2
    Originally posted by Knighte
    And what would've happened if they did?


    I see Lewis, who was lighter on his feet - and old enough to be George's son -outboxing the older, slower Foreman.. that is, when he wasn't hugging him or dancing around him. But I wonder if Lewis' thunderous rights would've so much as dented Foreman's chin? This has lopsided decision written all over it, if you ask me. In favor of Lennox, of course.

    I think this fight could theoretically have happened if Shannon Briggs wasn't awarded a gift decision over Foreman.. He went on to fight Lewis for the title and lost, although he gave a good accounting of himself
    I think Foreman would of gotten tko'd. He just didn't have the speed to stop Lewis from landing. If Morrison and Alex Stewart could lump him up, and Moorer could easily outbox him till getting caught, I would expect Lennox to really be able to lay it on him. If it had happened, it may have been almost as sad to see as Ali-Holmes. Well, maybe not that bad, but ba just the same.

    Comment

    • jollystomper
      Amateur
      Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
      • Feb 2009
      • 27
      • 12
      • 14
      • 6,302

      #3
      lennox wouldve killed old george!

      Comment

      • res
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2006
        • 4219
        • 150
        • 4
        • 12,056

        #4
        I don't think Foreman would have done as bad as people think, he outboxed Briggs pretty convincingly. It was a prime example of what I always say, people overemphasize speed and underemphasize cleverness far too often.

        Watch lewis in the first two rounds of his fight with Briggs lol.

        I say Lewis by UD
        Last edited by res; 03-10-2009, 08:00 PM.

        Comment

        • them_apples
          Lord
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2007
          • 9764
          • 1,180
          • 900
          • 41,722

          #5
          Lewis wasn't really that quick, and if he got hit hard he would often fight on the backfoot for the rest of the fight using his jab. It would have been a good fight, with George having his moment's and losing a UD. George often looked frustrated because he was unable to land on quicker fighters, but when he did....

          Comment

          • Kid McCoy
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 1029
            • 86
            • 155
            • 7,583

            #6
            In his 40s Foreman fought Holyfield and Moorer, and chased Tyson for a few years, but tbh I don't think Lewis was ever on his radar. As for who would win, George would always have his ace, but I'd fancy Lewis to stay cautious and out-box him as Morrison did.

            Comment

            • MANGLER
              Sex Tape Flop Artist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 30142
              • 1,705
              • 2,355
              • 46,598

              #7
              Lewis woulda won a UD. Foreman woulda had a chance for a KO, but likely woulda lost wide on points.

              Comment

              • KnockoutTheFat
                Beer Spokesman
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • May 2006
                • 5130
                • 220
                • 221
                • 12,177

                #8
                It didn't happen because Briggs "won" over him which enabled him to become the WBC's #1 contender. But if the fight did happen Lewis would win a wide unanimous decision

                Comment

                • joe strong
                  Average Joe
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 17786
                  • 1,758
                  • 832
                  • 58,015

                  #9
                  I saw a great interview with foreman.he said had he won the Briggs fight he would NOT have fought lewis.he said he fought in 4 decades & against the best.he said lewis was the greatest heavyweight of all time!he said when he beat michael moorer he said he ducked lewis & had no intentions of fighting him.he said he ducked him in his comeback & would have ducked him in his prime.he said a motivated lewis in his prime was unstoppable,& he only needed his power jab to beat most of the heavyweights ever.he said lewis' only weekness was his arrogance(think mccall & Rahman)...that says alot about lewis when you get those kind of accolades from an alltime great like foreman.he actually thought lewis could beat most guys 1 handed.I think that's a little far fetched but a great statement from a great champion

                  Comment

                  • Thread Stealer
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2007
                    • 9657
                    • 439
                    • 102
                    • 17,804

                    #10
                    Originally posted by joe strong
                    I saw a great interview with foreman.he said had he won the Briggs fight he would NOT have fought lewis.he said he fought in 4 decades & against the best.he said lewis was the greatest heavyweight of all time!he said when he beat michael moorer he said he ducked lewis & had no intentions of fighting him.he said he ducked him in his comeback & would have ducked him in his prime.he said a motivated lewis in his prime was unstoppable,& he only needed his power jab to beat most of the heavyweights ever.he said lewis' only weekness was his arrogance(think mccall & Rahman)...that says alot about lewis when you get those kind of accolades from an alltime great like foreman.he actually thought lewis could beat most guys 1 handed.I think that's a little far fetched but a great statement from a great champion
                    Foreman says a lot of strange things. I remember a Sports Illustrated article right before Lewis-Tyson where Foreman is asked how long Lewis would last with Foreman in Foreman's prime, and Foreman says "2 rounds".

                    Then Lewis beats Tyson and Foreman says "Lewis is the greatest heavyweight ever". I think he said it in the UK, so maybe he wanted to endear himself to the public in the UK and hope they buy his new book.

                    Foreman also claimed that he lost to Ali because he was distracted by seeing a friend in the audience betray him by rooting for Ali.

                    Lewis most likely would have beaten 90s Foreman in ugly fashion. Foreman was careful about whom he fought. Unless it was for the title (and Moorer was a vulnerable champ), he wasn't going to take any big risks like a Lewis fight.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP