Mike McCallum Vs Donald Curry Full Fight VIDEO!

[Anthony342]

Is this McCallums best performance?

Maybe not his best performance, but one of his most exciting fights and one of his best punches and one of the best one punch knockouts I've ever seen. That was one of those where I think of that Chris Tucker line "you just got knocked the hell out" or is it "you just got knocked the **** out!"?

I just watched this on DVD actually, interested it gets posted now, if only to me.

[Snopkins]

Nobody said Lyle was unworthy. But the FACT is he was fighting tomato cans at that particular time and the time line simply doesn't fit. If you think it does be my guest and reconfigure it. And as I said, Bugner was a top 10 fighter. It also seems you have no problem with Lyle fighting rthat same "shot" Ellis just a year earlier, but want to hold it against Joe even though Jimmy's style was more suitable for getting ready for the Ali rematch.

Lyle was actually rated higher than bugner in the rankings,gabby.Lyle was a contender,a puncher with a reputation so fierce that Joe frazier avoided ever fighting him.


I have no problem with it as Lyle isn't regarded as an ATG while frazier is.frazier fought him as an easy tune up as he know Ellis wouldn't pose any trouble for him.He had already beaten a rusty Jimmy Ellis decisively some five years previous.

You're still ducking my questions and you're still lying. You most certainly called Louis an attempted murderer and everyone on this board knows it.

Do you ever get tired of me kicking your ass on these boards?

I never called Louis an attempted murderer.Unless you can qoute me making such a claim then stop lying.


It's difficult to get tired of something that isn't happening.

[JAB5239]

Lyle was actually rated higher than bugner in the rankings,gabby.

Whats your point, and how about addressing the time line issue?

Lyle was a contender,a puncher with a reputation so fierce that Joe frazier avoided ever fighting him.

Lol, this goes to show you what a troll you are or how prone you are to exaggeration. Neither are very redeeming qualities. Anyway, if the time line had been suitable to make the fight happen why would Frazier be threatened by a man (Im not knocking Lyle, just pointing out facts) that didn't ko any of the 3 fighters he fought during the time you said Frazier "ducked" him? Peralta was 38 and in his last fight. Both Newton and Bailey were tomato cans. Lyle barely sc****d by Newton with a SD, and in spite of having Bailey down 6 times he couldn't keep him there.

I have no problem with it as Lyle isn't regarded as an ATG while frazier is.frazier fought him as an easy tune up as he know Ellis wouldn't pose any trouble for him.He had already beaten a rusty Jimmy Ellis decisively some five years previous.

The Ellis fight was a unification fight. Hardly Joe's fault if Ellis wasn't as active as he could have been leading up to that bout. As far as the '75 fight goes, let me present you with a scenario.....Lets say both Lennox Lewis and Vitaly Klitschko were going to have a rematch after they fought but both were going to take a fight in between to stay sharp. Do you think either of those guys would be looking to fight a Chris Byrd type fighter or maybe a Jameel McCline or Derrick Jefferson who wouldn't be considered a huge risk, but was more representable of the other mans style?

I never called Louis an attempted murderer.Unless you can qoute me making such a claim then stop lying.

If you aren't willing to go back through all your banned accounts to find things, why should I? Everybody here knows what you said. Everyone here knows you're a troll and a liar. Nothing you can do or say can change that.

It's difficult to get tired of something that isn't happening.

You couldn't tell by this thread.

[Snopkins]

Whats your point, and how about addressing the time line issue?

My point was that Lyle was higher in the rankings.Is that difficult to understand?

frazier avoided Lyle from 1973-1976.

Lol, this goes to show you what a troll you are or how prone you are to exaggeration. Neither are very redeeming qualities. Anyway, if the time line had been suitable to make the fight happen why would Frazier be threatened by a man (Im not knocking Lyle, just pointing out facts) that didn't ko any of the 3 fighters he fought during the time you said Frazier "ducked" him? Peralta was 38 and in his last fight. Both Newton and Bailey were tomato cans. Lyle barely sc****d by Newton with a SD, and in spite of having Bailey down 6 times he couldn't keep him there.

Turned boxrec ranger have we? Lyle remained a top ranked contender for three to four years while frazier was still a top heavyweight and frazier wanted nothing to do with him.

The Ellis fight was a unification fight. Hardly Joe's fault if Ellis wasn't as active as he could have been leading up to that bout. As far as the '75 fight goes, let me present you with a scenario.....Lets say both Lennox Lewis and Vitaly Klitschko were going to have a rematch after they fought but both were going to take a fight in between to stay sharp. Do you think either of those guys would be looking to fight a Chris Byrd type fighter or maybe a Jameel McCline or Derrick Jefferson who wouldn't be considered a huge risk, but was more representable of the other mans style?

I would criticize them if they were cherry pickers and as inactive as frazier was.A lazy fighter afraid of taking a risk while taking the easy option of leeching off of another fighters legacy.

If you aren't willing to go back through all your banned accounts to find things, why should I? Everybody here knows what you said. Everyone here knows you're a troll and a liar. Nothing you can do or say can change that.

You couldn't tell by this thread





because you know that I never made such a claim and now it bothers you.I know that you're a troll and a liar.



Keep dreaming,gabby

[JAB5239]

My point was that Lyle was higher in the rankings.Is that difficult to understand?

frazier avoided Lyle from 1973-1976.

This is impossible if you look at the time frame of both fighters. When were they supposed to fight, when Lyle was fighting old men and tomato cans or wgen Frazier was fight Ali, Foreman or preparing for rematches that were much bigger than a Lyle fight? Please explain.

Turned boxrec ranger have we? Lyle remained a top ranked contender for three to four years while frazier was still a top heavyweight and frazier wanted nothing to do with him.

You have ZERO proof of this and the time line I laid out for you proves it.

I would criticize them if they were cherry pickers and as inactive as frazier was.A lazy fighter afraid of taking a risk while taking the easy option of leeching off of another fighters legacy.

Lol, your hate and bias are so easy to bring out and expose its funny!

because you know that I never made such a claim and now it bothers you.I know that you're a troll and a liar.

EVERYONE knows you made the claim. If Im such a troll and a liar why don't you go to the dome and make a poll on which of us is the reall troll and liar. You won't because you know how it will turn out. It will be another miserable failure just like every other time you try and lock horns with me.

[Snopkins]

This is impossible if you look at the time frame of both fighters. When were they supposed to fight, when Lyle was fighting old men and tomato cans or wgen Frazier was fight Ali, Foreman or preparing for rematches that were much bigger than a Lyle fight? Please explain..

Um.......anytime from 1973-1976? The time when Lyle was at his peak and a top contender?

You have ZERO proof of this and the time line I laid out for you proves it..

frazier tuned himself up against hand picked opponents that he and his managment deemed easy wins.

Lol, your hate and bias are so easy to bring out and expose its funny!.

Every thing I said about frazier was true.

EVERYONE knows you made the claim. If Im such a troll and a liar why don't you go to the dome and make a poll on which of us is the reall troll and liar. You won't because you know how it will turn out. It will be another miserable failure just like every other time you try and lock horns with me.

Keep your little E popularity contests to yourself,gabby.I don't need to beg others to go vote in a pointless thread that doesn't solve anything.


besides,you ran out on the last thread that you requested that I make.

I never made such a claim about Louis and you know I didn't.

[JAB5239]

Um.......anytime from 1973-1976? The time when Lyle was at his peak and a top contender?

You mean while Lyle was fighting tomato cans and losing to top contenders, Almost all the while Frazier is fighting the two best heavyweights on the world? Or do you mean when the time line doesn't fit at all and you refuse to acknowledge that? Which one?

frazier tuned himself up against hand picked opponents that he and his managment deemed easy wins.

Hand picked like rematching Ali twice and fighting Foreman twice? Yeah, right!

Every thing I said about frazier was true.

Hahahaha, another lie about the lies you keep telling. Hilarious!!

Keep your little E popularity contests to yourself,gabby.I don't need to beg others to go vote in a pointless thread that doesn't solve anything.

Don't post a poll than, just ask them to discuss who is the real troll. Its funny how you started a thread about Poet and got **** all over in it. You know why that happened? Everybody knows you're a troll. If it weren't true you'd man up and prove it.

besides,you ran out on the last thread that you requested that I make.

Did I run out or were you so thoroughly owned I didn't need to bother with you weak ass thread any longer?

I never made such a claim about Louis and you know I didn't.

I know that you're a troll and still lying, that is what I know.

[Snopkins]

You mean while Lyle was fighting tomato cans and losing to top contenders, Almost all the while Frazier is fighting the two best heavyweights on the world? Or do you mean when the time line doesn't fit at all and you refuse to acknowledge that? Which one?.

While Lyle was more relevant to the heavyweight division than a shot Jimmy Ellis.While frazier spent months upon months planning his next cherry pick while he could have een clearing the division of all contenders to actually earn a title shot.

Hand picked like rematching Ali twice and fighting Foreman twice? Yeah, right!.

Hand picking a pointless rematch against a shot Jimmy Ellis while ignoring virtually every puncher that entered the top ten rankings.

Hilarious!!.

Yes,your posts are.

Don't post a poll than, just ask them to discuss who is the real troll. Its funny how you started a thread about Poet and got **** all over in it. You know why that happened? Everybody knows you're a troll. If it weren't true you'd man up and prove it..

Why? I don't care what others think of me over the internet.Poet was exposed in that thread and it shocked most posters that he really was that much of a saddo.

Did I run out or were you so thoroughly owned I didn't need to bother with you weak ass thread any longer?.

No,you definately run out.

I know that you're a troll and still lying, that is what I know.

You speak the truth......about yourself.

[JAB5239]

While Lyle was more relevant to the heavyweight division than a shot Jimmy Ellis.

Yup, I'll agree with this. Unfortunately he wasn't more relevant to getting Frazier better prepared for the better fighter in Ali, was he?

While frazier spent months upon months planning his next cherry pick while he could have een clearing the division of all contenders to actually earn a title shot.

As I've already proven Frazier fought the best available opposition. Its why you haven'y refuted the time line....you can't.

Hand picking a pointless rematch against a shot Jimmy Ellis while ignoring virtually every puncher that entered the top ten rankings.

You say the same thing over and over while ignoring the facts and refusing to answer questions. Pathetic.

Yes,your posts are.

Lame. Whats next, 'Im rubber your glue'?

Why? I don't care what others think of me over the internet.Poet was exposed in that thread and it shocked most posters that he really was that much of a saddo.

No,you definately run out.

Its funny but I just went over both those threads and the overwhelming majority of posters were against you or accusing you of being a troll. You must have just forgotten that little point though, huh?

You speak the truth......about yourself.

Lol.....so unoriginal and weak.

By the way, I can see you want no part of my post on Lyle in the overrated punchers thread.

[Snopkins]

Yup, I'll agree with this. Unfortunately he wasn't more relevant to getting Frazier better prepared for the better fighter in Ali, was he?

frazier fought Ali in March of 1971,rematched in January of 1974 and completed the trilogy in fall of 1975.



Not enough time for frazier to have fought Lyle?

As I've already proven Frazier fought the best available opposition. Its why you haven'y refuted the time line....you can't.

He fought Ali and foreman and avoided every puncher that entered the top ten rankings.

Its funny but I just went over both those threads and the overwhelming majority of posters were against you or accusing you of being a troll. You must have just forgotten that little point though, huh?

Doesn't change the fact that you ran out on the thread that you requested that I make.


Doesn't bother me that others may dislike me on the internet.

By the way, I can see you want no part of my post on Lyle in the overrated punchers thread.

It's hardly surprising is it? You discrediting a fighter who I speak in favour of