Salvador Sanchez Vs Manny Pacquiao

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Anthony342
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2010
    • 11801
    • 1,461
    • 355
    • 102,713

    #21
    Originally posted by billeau2
    Lets look at pac against other great Mexican fighters and lets look at the difference. Pac fought plenty of great Mexican fighters, and he was competative. But Sanchez had more... he was a natural talent, as technically accomplished as Marquez, with the power of Morales, and the tenacity of Barrera.

    Pac might do well with his speed for at least a while, but he comes in strictly off one line. In fact Pac fights a lot like a Thai Fighter in the sense that he does not use angels. Marquez Ko'ed him stepping off Pac's attack line. Not a good look considering that Sanchez had more power, in both hands. I don't see him beating Sanchez.
    Well nobody uses angels. That would be cheating and he'd lose by DQ. That would be outside interference, like you see in pro wrestling. Unless they're invisible, like in Angels in the Outfield. Is it true they called Salvador "Clean Sanchez"?

    Comment

    • billeau2
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2012
      • 27644
      • 6,396
      • 14,933
      • 339,839

      #22
      Originally posted by Anthony342
      Well nobody uses angels. That would be cheating and he'd lose by DQ. That would be outside interference, like you see in pro wrestling. Unless they're invisible, like in Angels in the Outfield. Is it true they called Salvador "Clean Sanchez"?
      lol... sorry meant "angles."

      Comment

      • Anthony342
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2010
        • 11801
        • 1,461
        • 355
        • 102,713

        #23
        Originally posted by billeau2
        lol... sorry meant "angles."
        I know, I was just being a silly goose.

        Comment

        • QueensburyRules
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2018
          • 21830
          • 2,354
          • 17
          • 187,708

          #24
          Originally posted by billeau2
          Idiocy? Like the generalizations you claim? What does it mean the best fighter ever fought? why? what qualities, what technical means? And now you become the resident size queen? Who knew?

          ****** post, unless you can specifically tell us why size would benefit one man, and what qualities (the best) make the fight a certain way.

          I will say it again: Manny is truly great. his footspeed is incredible. But he comes in direct... His point of entry is a line, it is right out in front. From a technical stand point we see proof of how this creates problems for him, when we see how well Marquez has done. Proof right?

          Marquez is a great, technically accomplished fighter, maybe even someone to consider as a great fighter... But he is no Sanchez. Sanchez was faster, stronger, as technically accomplished.
          - -Never signed on to BALCO Juan who ducked Manny twice when it counted the most because he didn't like getting beatup.

          Quit conflating him to Sal, a false analogy.

          Comment

          • billeau2
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Jun 2012
            • 27644
            • 6,396
            • 14,933
            • 339,839

            #25
            Originally posted by QueensburyRules
            - -Never signed on to BALCO Juan who ducked Manny twice when it counted the most because he didn't like getting beatup.

            Quit conflating him to Sal, a false analogy.
            How silly you are. they fought how many times?
            Didn't like getting beat up, yet got up from a beating most guys would never get up from and gave it right back to pac... think things through.

            Conflating Saul lol. whatever you are referring to? which I know not...based on the rest of this post that is probably a good thing.

            Comment

            • QueensburyRules
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • May 2018
              • 21830
              • 2,354
              • 17
              • 187,708

              #26
              Originally posted by billeau2
              How silly you are. they fought how many times? :

              Conflating Saul lol. whatever you are referring to? which I know not...based on the rest of this post that is probably a good thing.
              - -U organic prob needs looking into.

              Conflating Sal with BALCO Juan is libelous if not worse.

              U certified casual now?

              La dos...Sal at 23 had a formidable rep and record at the peak of his prime that favor him...Manny just starting his prime where he hops 3 divisions where he no longer is held to 3rd world starvation abuse and can properly showcase his speed out of would soon become the southpaw domination of boxing that favors him.

              Simples...

              Comment

              • billeau2
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jun 2012
                • 27644
                • 6,396
                • 14,933
                • 339,839

                #27
                Originally posted by QueensburyRules
                - -U organic prob needs looking into.

                Conflating Sal with BALCO Juan is libelous if not worse.

                U certified casual now?

                La dos...Sal at 23 had a formidable rep and record at the peak of his prime that favor him...Manny just starting his prime where he hops 3 divisions where he no longer is held to 3rd world starvation abuse and can properly showcase his speed out of would soon become the southpaw domination of boxing that favors him.

                Simples...
                You don't really read posts do you? You kind of look at a post and decide if you want to dribble drabble, or not.

                I used Marquez as one aspect to highlight Sanchez technical ability, not as a total package equivelent to Sanchez... READ POSTS BEFORE YOU TAKE A S H I T ON THE THREAD.

                and Ive told you this before... you don't know squat about BALCO, I happen to have info on Victor from people who knew him and what he was doing. It is way more complicted than a single celled peon like you could envision...

                U toopid? Yes you are!

                Man... come on... Your own narrative... poor starving pac, once fed becomes a juggenaught. Pac is an ATG but has shown weakness and was a lot less invincible than Sanchez. And whether you try to explain it away, or not *which woulld be prefarable, Marquez is a great fighter who has beat Pac. Deal with it...

                Comment

                • billeau2
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jun 2012
                  • 27644
                  • 6,396
                  • 14,933
                  • 339,839

                  #28
                  Originally posted by Anthony342
                  Well nobody uses angels. That would be cheating and he'd lose by DQ. That would be outside interference, like you see in pro wrestling. Unless they're invisible, like in Angels in the Outfield. Is it true they called Salvador "Clean Sanchez"?
                  Thats not true! Queenie uses angels, they come down and rest on his pin head and whisper things in his ears... Things like "Pac lost to Marquez because of Balco related roids..."

                  Comment

                  • QueensburyRules
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • May 2018
                    • 21830
                    • 2,354
                    • 17
                    • 187,708

                    #29
                    Originally posted by billeau2
                    You don't really read posts do you? You kind of look at a post and decide if you want to dribble drabble, or not.

                    I used Marquez as one aspect to highlight Sanchez technical ability, not as a total package equivelent to Sanchez... READ POSTS BEFORE YOU TAKE A S H I T ON THE THREAD.

                    and Ive told you this before... you don't know squat about BALCO, I happen to have info on Victor from people who knew him and what he was doing. It is way more complicted than a single celled peon like you could envision...

                    U toopid? Yes you are!

                    Man... come on... Your own narrative... poor starving pac, once fed becomes a juggenaught. Pac is an ATG but has shown weakness and was a lot less invincible than Sanchez. And whether you try to explain it away, or not *which woulld be prefarable, Marquez is a great fighter who has beat Pac. Deal with it...
                    - -U seriously need to have that organic prob looked into.

                    Prob barely follow boxing and clearly lost at sea anytime U try to follow a timeline signature that every fighter has.

                    Comment

                    • billeau2
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Jun 2012
                      • 27644
                      • 6,396
                      • 14,933
                      • 339,839

                      #30
                      Originally posted by QueensburyRules
                      - -U seriously need to have that organic prob looked into.

                      Prob barely follow boxing and clearly lost at sea anytime U try to follow a timeline signature that every fighter has.
                      ? Engrish!!!! Pwease!!

                      Didn't mean to get you flustered... The gerital is on the table where it always is.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP