Originally posted by poet682006
View Post
Hagler gave away many things in negotiationing the fight. Why on earth he would do the same mistake when older is clear only in your simple mind.
At the end of the fight Hagler was not hurt or particularly tired, Leonard was barely able to walk. Yet, according to you one year later Hagler could do nothing better.
Most important, Hagler threw away rounds by chasing Leonard from an orthodox stance trying to beat him at his own game. Since when do you need to be younger to have a better fight plan?
Finally, "Two old dudes mixing it up a second time: Why would anyone want to watch?" Considering there was plenty of people watching Leonard-Duran 3 and Leonard-Hearns 2, taking place 2 years later and Hagler-Leonard was a very close fights among two superstars, I think the answer is clear to everyone: "A lot of people".
This post shows again your inability of thinking logically, and your ridiculous position on many facts.
Comment