mrgreb

I think it all depends on which Khan we're talking about. If it's the on point Khan who brings his A game then yes he's top 5 and most guys would struggle against him. If it's not A game Khan then a lot of guys can trouble him.

I asked the same question in a twitter poll. I got 242 votes. Pac vs Khan got 91% of the vote Pac vs Crawford got 9% of the vote

The end of Ring as a credible, believable boxing magazine ended when Oscar the promoter purchased the magazine so he could use it as a tool to do his bidding. Todays more savvy promoter buys social media accounts with large audiences and uses them to do their bidding

If Khan can stay focused for 12 rounds, then he can win. However, he struggles to do that against orthodox fighters. The fight will likely be at a catchweight too, so that will benefit Brook more than it does Khan.

Remeber when his dad flipped on Villegas, talking about losses being clear cut. Someone remind this fool.

Khan needs to be bullied by Brook for Brook to win. If Brook does his usual 1-2, Khan will win. Will be interesting to see if Brook changes up. Always fun to see a boxer having to work out of his usual style to get the W. This fight si a 50-50 like Hatton says, anybody claiming anything else is nut riding. Plenty of nut riders when it comes to Khan - Brook. Very few impartial opinions.

Can somebody get me some of what Horn is smoking?

140 is a dangerous division domestically, forget worldwide. Flanagan will be lucky to make it out of there alive.

The IBF are tight with Hearn these days, it’s almost like the WBO with Warren. The IBF do what Hearn tells them to do.

I want to see Prograis vs Taylor this year