Nonsense. Every year is full of upsets. I already shut down this claim of 2008 being the year of the upset by bringing up 2001, when a lot of BIG fights ended in upsets. Undefeated p4p fighters, or heavyweight champions losing to 20-1 underdogs. Not fights when a prospect loses to an undefeated prospect.
People bring up Cotto-Margarito. Wow. Cotto was a 2-1 favorite. That rarely happens. :rofl:
Let's look at 2006:
Zab Judah loses the welterweight title to Carlos Baldomir. Baldomir was such a big underdog that some casinos didn't even carry the fight.
Bernard Hopkins, 3-1 underdog and coming off two straight losses, dominates Antonio Tarver for the light-heavyweight title.
Sergie Liakhovich beats Lamon Brewster, a -365 favorite, for the WBO HW belt.
Chris John upsets p4p fighter Juan Manuel Marquez. Don't know the betting odds.
Joel Casamayor, a 2-1 underdog, beats Diego Corrales for the lightweight title.
Oleg Maskaev, a 3-1 underdog, knocks out Hasim Rahman again for the WBC HW title.
O'Neil Bell, a 3 1/2 to 1 underdog, knocks out Jean Mormeck for the cruiserweight title.
Or let's look at 2004:
Erik Morales loses to Marco Antonio Barrera, who some consider shot after the Pacquiao massacre, and a 2-1 underdog. This was for supremacy at 130 and two belts.
Antonio Tarver, 4-1 underdog, knocks out light heavyweight and p4p champ Roy Jones.
Glen Johnson, 6-1 underdog, knocks out Roy Jones.
Danny Williams, 9-1 underdog, stops Mike Tyson.
Winky Wright (I have no idea why he was the underdog, but he was officially the underdog) beating Shane Mosley for the junior middleweight title.
Almost all of these were BIG fights which ended in upsets. Fights when champions, p4p fighters, were defeated by underdogs.
This is nothing new, but people get their dicks hard and think something exceptional is happening at the moment, when usually, it is not unique.
2:1 and 3:1 favorites losing are not big upsets...You can erase 75% that list.